FEATURE: Training Season: The Public Perceptions Versus Critical Regarding Female Headliners

FEATURE:

 

 

Training Season

IN THIS PHOTO: Dua Lipa performing on the Pyramid Stage at Glastonbury on 29th June, 2024/PHOTO CREDIT: PA

 

The Public Perceptions Versus Critical Regarding Female Headliners

_________

THIS may seem like a generalisation…

and, I know, opinion is subjective, but there does seem to be a divide in opinion when it comes to female headliners at festivals. For instance, Dua Lipa headlined Glastonbury on Friday (28th). The general reaction from critics was one of positivity. Whilst her set did not garner five-star reviews, she was getting solid four-star acclaim across the board. People noting how accomplished and hook-laden (the set) was. I will get to a review of her set soon. Maybe it afflicts male artists too but, when it comes to women headlining festivals, there is still an attitude and negativity. They always say: “Don’t read beneath the line”. That is, when you get a review of opinion piece, it is generally not a good idea to read the comments. You will get some positivity and support but, for the most part, there will be criticism and some awful feedback. It is the way of people. Among those who are nice are also plenty who are only too happy to be nasty. Reading, for instance, the comments of The Guardian’s review of Dua Lipa’s Glastonbury set, you can see that there are people who hark back to when Glastonbury was more Rock-based and male. many people accused Lipa of miming during her set. Others stating that she (Dua Lipa) was not as epic as she should have been. There is this gap between what critics write and what the public think. There were incredible reviews for SZA’s headline set on Sunday, but also some mixed reviews too. Many questioning whether she was headline-worthy or the right person to close Glastonbury.. Even so, once more, a divide between critical and public opinion. I am not saying that critics know best and they have greater musical knowledge. This is the first time Glastonbury has had more than one female headliner on the Pyramid Stage. I think that both artists delivered incredible sets. Sure, not the absolute greatest ever, though ample proof and demonstration that we need more women headlining. Long overdue.

Compared to Coldplay and their set, we saw that fresher and first-time headliners were a lot better and exciting than the more tired and over-familiar acts. I wonder whether there is this persistent prejudice when it comes to women as headliners. One could say that there is this discrimination against Pop music. People still not willing to accept that festivals have moved on and are not just for Rock and Alternative acts. I hope that there is now this realisation things are changing for the best. I saw criticism of Lana Del Rey when she performed at Glastonbury last year. Many who were against Billie Eilish when she headlined Glastonbury in 2022. Looking through some past year and the way female headliners are perceived, there does seem to be this division. One might say it is about genre and not gender. I don’t feel that is the case. Certainly, for those reviewing Dua Lipa, there was this sense that she delivered an amazing set. This is what Independent wrote in their review:

Dua Lipa saw it coming. The fireworks and flags and pulsing purple lights, the teenagers on tiptoes scowling at strange adults as they fling their arms in the air like money. When she was a girl, the 28-year-old born to Albanian-Kosovan parents, tells us midway into her debut Glastonbury headline show, she wrote it down – “I will headline Glastonbury” – manifesting the sleeper hits and critical acclaim and now routine awards and No 1s that made this moment inevitable.

“I was really specific,” she adds after a shy laugh. “I said I wanted to headline the Pyramid Stage on a Friday night, because then I knew I could party for the next two days.” Her voice cracks as she describes the magic – “the power” – of commanding this seemingly infinite crowd. “Little me would just be beside herself right now.”

The growing Dua Lipa empire – now encompassing an acting career, a book club, a burgeoning media platform and a podcast featuring giants of high and low culture – shows no signs of slowing, particularly now she has bought back the rights to her music catalogue. Yet behind the cultural dominance, Dua Lipa is as enigmatic as she is ubiquitous. Her arrestingly vague persona (along, perhaps, with her admirable support for geopolitical causes) has stopped her transcending bankable fame to become a true nation’s sweetheart.

Which may be just how she likes it. More than a straight pop spectacle, Lipa intersperses tonight’s set with nods to underground culture. As a martial drum solo opens the show, leather-clad dancers fling themselves across a pair of metal bridges, like a Swat team sent undercover into a Seventies New York meatpacking district. In a chain-lined leather dress of her own, Lipa zips to centre stage as if propelled by the roller-skates favoured on her last arena tour, barrelling into a party-starting “Training Season”.

Though the performance is tightly drilled – even the confetti deployment seems studied – passion rings through in moments of cheeky theatricality. Midway into the second verse, she flings back her head with revulsion at the inept exes she has made her muse.

It is no contradiction that many such boyfriends are no doubt in this field screaming along: the gospel of Dua holds that, while guys often suck, that is often fine, and kind of funny. Her mastery is in pairing these tales of woe and self-redemption with music that sounds like accidentally having the best night of your life at the worst club in your hometown.

Her celebration of alternative culture is most readily apparent on “One Kiss” – given a house breakdown worthy of Glastonbury’s wonderfully lurid queer nightlife haunt, NYC Downlow – and “Pretty Please”, revitalised with deliciously dirty funk swing and a breakdancing interlude that squeezes homages to her house, disco and rave roots into two breathtaking minutes of helter-shelter beat switches.

Between all this she finds time to introduce a comically low-key guest appearance: not one of her celeb buddies but an unassuming Kevin Parker – better known as the Australian psych-rock darling Tame Impala – who looks every bit the slacker boyfriend brought home to disappointed parents after their beloved daughter’s gap year. In honour of his contributions to her latest album, Radical Optimism, Parker mooches out in a T-shirt and jeans for an endearingly clumsy duet of his song “The Less I Know the Better”.

Aside from the electrifying opener, new album cuts such as “These Walls“ and “Falling Forever” feel like stodgy, almost defensive inclusions – even closer “Houdini” can’t help but feel anticlimactic after a sensational one-two of “Physical” and “Don’t Start Now”. I can believe, even hope, that Dua Lipa will endure to headline Glastonbury again, but it is harder to imagine these songs surviving as setlist musts.

“Guys, you’re making my dreams come true,” she declares during “Be the One”, a cliche that, despite the dips in momentum, makes clear that Lipa understood the assignment: Glastonbury is not just another show, just another festival – it is the moment we have been waiting for, all day, all year, perhaps all our lives. The best headline sets turn this into a reality, even among the sceptical. Dua Lipa does something almost as special: by bearing out her childhood premonition, she makes us witnesses to her own sweetest fantasy”.

As Glastonbury is now finished for another year, there is a lot to reflect on. Another triumphant year. It is not only about Glastonbury. It applies to all festivals. The tide is turning. Women, through slowly, being booked as headliners. Not just tokenism anymore: organisers including them on their merit. I do feel that there is slow progress. We need to be further along than we are. One would hope that all the public would be on board with how festivals are evolving and improving. I know comments left after reviews represent a distinctly small pool. Though, when you look online, there is a lot more of it. A sense that female headliners are less important and authoritative. Dua Lipa, SZA on the Pyramid Stage. Shania Twain on the legends slot. They all showed that women are on top. It is saddening and angering to see rather muted and over-critical reaction to their sets. It is important that women are embraced. This year’s Glastonbury was a sign of the future: that women are here to stay. They will – Let’s hope anyway – be headline fixtures going forward. I hope that there is more of an awareness of their brilliance and value. Critics seem to be on the page for the most part. I feel this wider sense of old values remaining. People not quite willing to bend and accept change. The more that women are booked as headliners, the better things will become. I know that people are entitled to their opinions and music is definitely subjective. I have no issue with that. There does appear to be this gender-based bias. Maybe not misogyny as such. Sexism certainly. Disappointing when these amazing women produce affirmative and stunning sets. There is a lot to reflect on and discuss further. Not least how we are in a year where there is progress. It needs to keep happening – and at a faster rate. Think about Glastonbury and how Sugababes got a huge crowd. They could have been headliners. You can see there is demand for wonderful women in music. When they are at that headline level, there is this barrier in complete acceptance and embrace. A feeling that the highest level should be for male artists. I hope that this changes. People reacting harshly or flatly to an artist like SZA or Dua Lipa. This year’s Glastonbury should be viewed as…

THEIR training season.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: The Beatles’ A Hard Day’s Night at Sixty: A 1964 Mix

FEATURE:

 

The Digital Mixtape

IN THIS PHOTO: The Beatles (Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and John Lennon) in 1964’s A Hard Day’s Night

 

The Beatles’ A Hard Day’s Night at Sixty: A 1964 Mix

_________

ON 7th July, 1964…

The Beatles’ A Hard Day’s Night film was released in cinemas. Their first feature film, it was at the time of Beatlemania. Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr on the big screen. Directed by Richard Lester, it is a magnificent film. Capturing the band at the first peak of their powers, A Hard Day’s Night is a sort of part-fictional insight into their lives and relationships with one another. Showing different sides to each band member, is it a hugely entertaining and charming film. One that was a critical and commercial success. An Academy Award-nominated film no less. Perhaps the finest film The Beatles appeared in. A few days after the cinematic release, on 10th July, 1964, the album of the same name came out. A Hard Day’s Night features songs from the film and other original compositions. An incredible album, and the first with all original songs from Lennon and McCartney, it is amazing that it still sounds so potent and evocative sixty years later. Surely one of the greatest albums of the 1960s. I am interested what was happening around The Beatles’ music in 1964. Other acts that were there. Even if it was a year very much about them conquering America and the globe, their music and fame grew in a year that boasted some other fantastic music. Those acts that they were almost in competition with. Some fellow legends and bands sort of coming through. To mark sixty years of A Hard Day’s Night film and album, I have compiled a mixtape of cuts from 1964. A wonderful and varied year for music, I think a lot of people overlook it. In celebration of a milestone anniversary for a tremendous Beatles film and album, here are some fellow artists who were releasing brilliant music…

IN 1964.

FEATURE: Paradise in Trouble: Checking in on a Wonderful and Inspiring Club

FEATURE:

 

Paradise in Trouble

IN THIS PHOTO: Rosie Holt will be hosted by The Trouble Club on 22nd July at The Groucho Club, London

 

Checking in on a Wonderful and Inspiring Club

_________

THE last time I published…

IN THIS PHOTO: Elizabeth Uviebinené spoke at Darmouth House for The Trouble Club on 17th June

a feature about The Trouble Club, it was back on 23rd March. I have a bit to catch up on now. I am going to take us as far as 22nd July. I am writing this on 30th June. Regardless, before I get to the events from 23rd March through to 22nd July, I wanted to do some housekeeping. You can follow The Trouble Club on Twitter and Instagram. Since the last feature, the club has now expanded. It holds events in Manchester in addition to London. Whereas Director Ellie Newton usually hosts (with Francesca Edmondson, Marketing & Events Coordinator, also hosting), we also have journalist Lara Olszowska. I am going to discuss the events I have attended and what I am going to between now and a few weeks from now. You can check out the schedule here. On 24th March, I attended Monarchs, Mistresses & More. A Guided Her-story Tour of Mayfair. A tour through Mayfair, it is led by the brilliant Mandy Morrow. Few tour guides offer up history with this perspective. She discusses the amazing and overlooked women who lived, worked and died in Mayfair. From the trailblazers to the rebels! It was an a stunning and illuminating tour. Not only did we get to learn about some important and fascinating women. It was also an opportunity to discover sites, alleys and corners of Mayfair I had never visited! If you are interested, you can book to go on one of these walks/tours here.

Moving into 26th March. This was a Neurodiversity Discussion with Jess & Mia. As The Trouble Club wrote: “Dynamic neurodivergent duo, Jess and Mia are the founders of the fast-growing Instagram platform I Am Paying Attention and they are on a mission to make work more neurodivergent-friendly”. As someone – like most who were on that Zoom event – who is neurodivergent, it was really helpful, and almost de-stigmatising hearing from Charlotte Mia and Jess Joy. Sharing their experiences of autism and ADHD,  their book, How Not to Fit In: An Unapologetic Guide to Navigating Autism and ADHD is essential reading. I want to come to an interview from March, where they talked about the book and subjects it addresses:

After meeting at university ten years ago and being each other’s rock for so many years, How Not to Fit In by best-friends Charlotte Mia and Jess Joy is the vital accompaniment for anyone trying to navigate their neurodivergence or simply anyone interested in these experiences. This book takes readers through all aspects of autism and ADHD and is hugely affirming, inspiring, and encouraging in what life can be like for people and how much society still needs to change. The debut gives real hope for a better understanding of neurodivergence.

Mia and Jess’s engaging, warm nature shines through in their book and upon meeting them. Their desire for change is palpable and they really stand out as people with inclusion and equality at the very heart of how they think and everything they do.

Is there anything that other ADHD and autistic resources sometimes don’t get quite right that you’ve tried to do differently in your book?

Mia: We’re very visual people and lots of the resources felt overly simplified or childlike or just used massive blocks of inaccessible text.

Jess: Lots of online resources are also information for parents about parenting their young children, but obviously as a woman in my late twenties how can I relate to this? Neurodivergence shows up in so many ways. In the book we’ve tried to break off text with bold writing, big quotes and have notes acknowledging the often-heavy nature of discussion. We want people to take breaks and process.

IN THIS PHOTO: Jess Joy and Charlotte Mia/PHOTO CREDIT: Tom Jackson for The Times Magazine

Has writing this book been transformative for you in any different ways than your social media platform?

Jess: I think the way we have navigated social media has been more aligned with where we currently have been on our journey, sharing quite in the moment experiences. But the book has had more in-depth reflection and looking at things like trauma and how that can play into our experiences.

Mia: We weren’t ready for the trauma that the book was going to bring up, were we?

Jess: Definitely not! We had to think about what is going to serve the person reading this? How do we encapsulate everything we’ve learned?

Mia: We had to drag up things that we haven’t spoken about on social media. It’s been tough in that way but also healing. I think people who read the book will get a more well-rounded view of us as people compared to the snippets of social media.

Your inclusion of stories from other people really made it feel like a community driven book. How did you come to the decision to do this and choosing what stories to include?

Jess: While our conversation needs to take place about being neurodivergent in adulthood, we also have a level of privilege. Emmanuel Fru is a young Black autistic man from Sweden who was detained for having an autistic meltdown. We’re very aware that unmasking isn’t always possible or safe, especially when you are already being discriminated against in various ways. We never want to only centre our experience.

Mia: It was probably one of the biggest tasks of the book. Not only figuring out who to include but also how to do it in an ethical way, as we were restrained by our publishers in terms of navigating paying people for their time and stories. If we’re going to hear from minorities, we can’t and don’t expect free labour. I think both us and our publishers have learnt a lot from that process of questioning how things work.

You note in the book that autism referrals have tripled since 2019! What would you say to narratives that “suddenly everyone is autistic or has ADHD” ?

Jess: I honestly don’t see how it could possibly be a negative thing that more people are in tune with what they might be struggling with and what they need. I think whatever label or lack of label people use, everyone deserves to navigate their existence with peace. So what if everyone is autistic and ADHD? Why don’t we just create an environment that works for everyone a little better?”.

Moving to 9th April, that is when I attended AllBright to see How Men Came to Rule with Angela Saini. The Patriarchs: How Men Came to Rule by Angela Saini is another book I would urge people to check out. I learned so much from the talk. How patriarchy and male dominance has been imbedded in culture and society from as far back as we can remember. Here are some more details:

SHORTLISTED FOR THE ORWELL PRIZE FOR POLITICAL WRITING 2023

A WATERSTONES BOOK OF YEAR FOR POLITICS 2023

‘I learned something new on every page of this totally essential book’ Sathnam Sanghera

‘By thinking about gendered inequality as rooted in something unalterable within us, we fail to see it for what it is: something more fragile that has had to be constantly remade and reasserted.’

In this bold and radical book, award-winning science journalist Angela Saini goes in search of the true roots of gendered oppression, uncovering a complex history of how male domination became embedded in societies and spread across the globe from prehistory into the present.

Travelling to the world’s earliest known human settlements, analysing the latest research findings in science and archaeology, and tracing cultural and political histories from the Americas to Asia, she overturns simplistic universal theories to show that what patriarchy is and how far it goes back really depends on where you are.

Despite the push back against sexism and exploitation in our own time, even revolutionary efforts to bring about equality have often ended in failure and backlash. Saini ends by asking what part we all play – women included – in keeping patriarchal structures alive, and why we need to look beyond the old narratives to understand why it persists in the present”.

Good Girls with Hadley Freeman happened on 12th April at Century Club. She was talking about Good Girls: A Story and Study of Anorexia. It was a very honest and raw talk from the journalist. I think everyone who was there at the talk went away moved and informed. For those who do not know about her book, here are some more details:

A searing memoir from Hadley Freeman, bestselling author of House of Glass, about one of the most misunderstood mental illnesses.

From the ages of fourteen to seventeen, Freeman lived in psychiatric wards after developing anorexia nervosa. For the next twenty years, she grappled with various forms of self-destructive behaviour as the anorexia mutated and persisted. Combining personal experience with deep reporting, this profoundly honest and hopeful story details Freeman's long journey to recovery”.

The Price of Life with Jenny Kleeman was one of the most interesting talks for The Trouble Club. At Home Grown, it was really intriguing. A book that explores the value of a human life in many different situations and forms, I would urge people to check it out. It was a really funny and brilliant evening on 17th April. The reviews for The Price of Life have been positive. Here is what The Guardian noted about a thought-provoking book:

Kleeman shows how prices are contingent on social status, where you live, market conditions and pure chance. While some of the variations reveal injustice, others are less meaningful and harder to compare. As Kleeman acknowledges, £200 to hire a killer or the $500 paid for a child bride in Afghanistan are really measures of desperation. It is when we get to the more abstract top-down allocation of resources, the necessary weighing of one life against another, that this book provides the most satisfying answers to the philosophical questions posed with such thoughtful clarity at the start.

Followers of the philanthropic movement known as effective altruism believe charitable donations should be determined by cool-headed quantification of the benefits, rather than a leaflet through the letterbox with a picture of an injured puppy. Effective altruists will prioritise helping a stranger on the other side of the world over a homeless person on your street if it represents more bang for your buck. They will tell you how to save a life for just $4,500 – as long as it’s a life in Africa, because those are deemed the least expensive. One advocate ruminates on the optimum age to save a person’s life. “I think my peak value is the death of an eight-year-old,” he says.

England and Wales’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) must also be dispassionate, but in the service of a cash-strapped NHS rather than billionaires’ consciences. Its deliberations are fascinating, and take place largely out of public view. Nice uses a measure called a Qaly: a quality-adjusted life year. One Qaly means one year in good health, and is worth £20,000-30,000. If a drug costs that much or less for each additional year of good health it provides for a patient, then Nice will approve it.

Kleeman meets the mother of a child with a rare genetic disease who was just over the age limit for access to the world’s most expensive medicine. She appealed to Nice through the media and it relented, showing its human face. The organisation has to reconcile the competing interests of the individual and the collective – as the mother put it, “I appreciate that there isn’t a never-ending supply of money, but when it’s your child … ” This tension is vastly exacerbated by market capitalism. “As long as pharmaceutical companies are run for profit,” Kleeman notes, “there will be a price on life.”

Her book is a mind-bending exploration of intrinsic and fungible value, recalling Shylock’s pound of flesh and his muddling of ducats and daughters. First you deplore the imposition of rigid metrics on tender human beings, then you remember that monetary worth is itself elastic. Kleeman has picked an illuminating lens through which to explore the quantification of everything in a data-driven society, and the pros and cons of cost-benefit analysis. Surprisingly, Nice’s Qaly figure was pretty much plucked from the air: it’s a relative measure, an arbitrary tool for comparison. “The danger comes,” Kleeman observes, “when people treat tokens as if they truly represent the real price of a human life.”

Having mooted a cost-benefit analysis for lockdowns, Cuomo bottled it. “To me, I say, the cost of  a human life … is priceless, period,” he declared. The then chancellor Rishi Sunak promised, likewise, to “do whatever it takes”. But “whatever it takes” has a price tag. Divide the cost of lockdown by the number of life years it saved, and you get £300,000: 10 times the Qaly threshold. If you piously dismiss these sums as cold calculation, Kleeman points out, more people might die, now or in the future. Putting a price on life can amount to exploitation, but sometimes it’s a way of being fair”.

Before heading into May’s Trouble Club event, there was one on 25th April, at The Hearth. The Trouble Club x Intact Creatives STORY SLAM! Was extraordinary. A chance for people to take the mic and share their stories, poems, notes or whatever they want to say, it is always a very emotive and connective experience. Story Slam, hosted by Ciara Charteris, was magnificent. I hope that they collaborate with The Trouble Club more in the future. There are a few May events I want to get to. The first, An Evening With Lucy Worsley, took place on 7th May at The Conduit in Covent Garden. She was discussing her book, Agatha Christie, and her history with and love of the famed author. A fascinating book that is worth ordering, I did not know about Worsley’s love and passion for Agatha Christie:

Why did Agatha Christie spend her career pretending that she was 'just' an ordinary housewife, when clearly she wasn't? As Lucy Worsley says, 'She was thrillingly, scintillatingly modern'. She went surfing in Hawaii, she loved fast cars, and she was intrigued by the new science of psychology, which helped her through devastating mental illness.

So why - despite all the evidence to the contrary - did Agatha present herself as a retiring Edwardian lady of leisure?

She was born in 1890 into a world which had its own rules about what women could and couldn't do. Lucy Worsley's biography is not just of an internationally renowned bestselling writer. It's also the story of a person who, despite the obstacles of class and gender, became an astonishingly successful working woman.

With access to personal letters and papers that have rarely been seen, Lucy Worsley's biography is both authoritative and entertaining and makes us realise what an extraordinary pioneer Agatha Christie was - truly a woman who wrote the twentieth century”.

There are a couple of other events from May I will not expand on. One is An Evening with MP Claire Coutinho, Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero. That happened on 21st May at Century Club. Also, the brilliant Breaking Free From Old Patterns with Dr Annie Zimmerman. Hosted by Lara Olszowska, it was a wonderful talk. The History Lessons with Shalina Patel took place on 22nd May at The Hearth. As a history graduate, it was engrossing hearing Patel talk so passionately about teaching history and bringing different times and events to life. Discussing what history curriculum is taught to students now – one more expansive and deeper than years before -, it was a wonderful and illuminating evening. Her book is definitely one people should think about getting:

Taking the reader on a tour through history, from the Romans to the Second World War via Tudor courts, medieval castles and more, this hugely entertaining debut from an award-winning history teacher explores a variety of historical topics in a thoughtful and engaging way. Written in an approachable and accessible style, Shalina Patel will be your guide on an eye-opening and jaw-dropping journey back in time.

The History Lessons invites readers to reclaim our history education, and is a treat for curious minds keen to look beyond the usual narratives. This is a book that celebrates stories and people that may be less familiar - but no less remarkable or fascinating”.

There are four past events and five future ones I will highlight before wrapping things up. Exhausted with Anna Katharina Schaffner was really moving and resonated. Burnout is something that we all experience at some point. Scaffner investigated and explored why we feel burnout. On 5th June at AllBright, we witnessed a really interesting talk. Schaffner is an exhaustion coach. Her book provides a lot of answers and reasons why we go through burnout. Ways we can identify and manage it:

Burnout is said to be the defining feeling of the post-pandemic world - but why are we all so exhausted? Some of us struggle with perfectionism, while others are simply overwhelmed by the demands of modern life. But whatever you're feeling, you are not alone - and this liberating, enlightening guide to exhaustion in all its forms will help you find the energy to beat burnout and weariness. From confronting our inner critics to how our desire to be productive stops us from being free, I bring together science, medicine, literature and philosophy to explore the causes and history of exhaustion and burnout, revealing new ways to combat stress and negativity. Inventive and freewheeling, full of comfort, solace and practical advice, Exhausted is an inspiring guide to getting control of your own exhaustion - and rediscovering happiness along the way”.

The View From Down Here with Lucy Webster was extremely powerful. The View from Down Here is a memoir about sexism, ableism and disabled womanhood. Talking at The Hearth on 6th June, hearing Webster speak about her experiences and daily life. The ignorance and prejudice she faces. It was shocking to hear. She is resilient and defiant in the face of such discrimination. If you don’t know about the book, then it is well worth a read. The talk was extremely important and affecting:

Women's lives are shaped by sexism and expectations. Disabled people's lives are shaped by ableism and a complete lack of expectations. But what happens when you're subjected to both sets of rules?

This powerful, honest, hilarious and furious memoir from journalist and advocate Lucy Webster looks at life at the intersection; the struggles, the joys and the unseen realities of being a disabled woman. From navigating the worlds of education and work, dating and friendship; to managing care; contemplating motherhood; and learning to accept your body against a pervasive narrative that it is somehow broken and in need of fixing, The View From Down Here shines a light on what it really means to move through the world as a disabled woman”.

Two more June events before moving into this month. How to Find Your Inner Voice with Elizabeth Uviebinené was very helpful to me. As a journalist, hearing about her app, Storia, was inspiring. Elizabeth Uviebinené is the award-winning author of five books, including the phenomenon, Slay In Your Lane. She was at Dartmouth House on 17th June. You can find out more about Storia here:

Our minds have never been so active, processing everything from content to conversations, the mundane to cherished memories, aspirations, and worries. Basically, we’re overstimulated and living on autopilot.

Consequently, the modern world is now a feedback device; it seeks to tell us who we are, what we should be, and what we should dream about. And it is loud. So loud, in fact, most of us have lost sight of our true, authentic selves.

But our inner voice is the engine room of our lives. It requires nurturing. So I'm building Storia to help you separate the signal from the noise. Welcome”.

One of the funniest and most entertaining events I have been in attendance for The Trouble Club was The Revenge Club with Kathy Lette on 19th June at The Hearth. The amazing Australian travel writer, author and T.V. presenter discussed her must-read book, The Revenge Club. A book that focused on middle-aged woman as leads is rare. It is rare on screen and beyond. A very necessary book, it is currently being discussed as a T.V. series. Lette was in superb form as she talked about the book and her profile career. I am very interested in The Revenge Club:

Matilda, Jo, Penny and Cressy are all women at the top of their game; so imagine their surprise when they start to be personally overlooked and professionally pushed aside by less-qualified men.

Only they’re not going down without a fight.

Society might think the women have passed their amuse-by dates but the Revenge Club have other plans.

After all, why go to bed angry when you could stay up and plot diabolical retribution? Let the games begin…”.

On 4th July, there is a very important Trouble event. Trouble's Election Night Special featuring Coco Khan! Happening at Kindred in Hammersmith, Trouble members will congreagate to see the Election results come in. It is shaping up to be a big event:

It’s happening! Britain is going to the polls on the 4th of July and we want you to join us for a drinks, talks and networking evening to watch the results as they roll in.

We’ll have a large screen showing coverage, speakers throughout the evening such as Pod Save the UK host, Coco Khan and political commentator Marina Purkiss (tbc). There will also be drinks and grazing boards.

We’ll watch the exit poll come through at 10pm and see the first official results trickle in. Join us for the biggest political night of the year!”.

I am really looking forward to A Truly, Madly, Funny Evening with the sensational Helen Lederer at AllBright on 18th July. I think this is the next live event I am going to. The legendary comedian, I know, will talk about her new memoir, Not That I’m Bitter. She will also reflect on her amazing career:

What was it like as one of a handful of women at the heart of the right-on alternative comedy scene in the 1980s? Piece of cake? Bit of a laugh? Well, yes, and no. It had its ups - but also its downs. Helen Lederer was a regular on the stand-up circuit and new-wave sketch shows in the decade that launched the careers of today's comedy household names and national treasures.

She shared stages with comedy pioneers like Ben Elton and John Hegley, and TV screens with Dawn French, Jennifer Saunders, Harry Enfield, and many others. From the iconic Absolutely Fabulous, to Bottom, Happy Families, Naked Video, French and Saunders and Girls on Top, it is difficult to think of a comedy show that Helen wasn't a part of. So, plain sailing then? Well, not really. Even in those ground-breaking, anti-Thatcher days, there was only room at top for so many women. For the rest, it was as much a struggle to be seen and heard in the world of comedy as in any boardroom or workplace, and just as difficult to avoid the predators.

Helen will join us to talk about her phenomenal, rollercoaster of a career as well as the Comedy Women in Print Prize which Helen founded in 2018 in response to the low number of women awarded the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize. Three women in 18 years. Come along to learn more and hear from one of the greatest comedy legends in Britain”.

Happening at The Groucho Club on 22nd July, Why We Were Right with Rosie Holt MP(ish) is going to be quite the event! Her political spoofs and videos might take on a new angle and relevance after the General Election. Her new book, Why We Were Right makes for brilliant reading. I would suggest you try and get a ticket for the upcoming Trouble Club event:

This event could not have come at a better time. Rosie Holt is an MP....sort of.....well not at all actually but she does do an incredible job of taking the mickey out of our elected representatives, especially the ones in blue.

Rosie is best known to her >300k followers for her viral internet ‘interviews’ on Twitter in character as a hapless, desperately loyal Conservative MP. Her MP alter ego often creates chaos and conversation online, as she reacts to the news agenda and proudly defends the last 14 years of Conservative government.

To accompany her viral interviews, Rosie's written and entire book from the perspective of Rosie Holt MP, taking us through the triumphs of the last decade - from getting Brexit done and bending the Ministerial Code, to rowing back on climate change policies and voting in Liz Truss as leader. Why We Were Right explains why the so called ‘scandals’ or ‘controversial’ decisions of the government that have been derided by the Left and the ‘woke’ media were completely right – and intentional – all along.

Join us for a night of laughter and tears as we look back at many years of Tory leadership with their greatest troll”.

IN THIS PHOTO: Olivia Petter/PHOTO CREDIT: Alexandra Cameron

The final event I want to throw ahead to is The Power of Celebrity with Olivia Petter. Taking place on 24th July at AllBright, I am really excited about this talk. It sounds like it is going to be a must-attend evening. Her debut novel is available from 18th July:

We give celebrities a power they don’t deserve. Power they haven’t earned. What happens when they exploit it?

Imagine you’ve just spent the night with the most famous man on the planet. Except you don’t quite remember it. That is what happens to Rose, a twenty-something woman in Olivia Petter's new book, Gold Rush.

Gold Rush is a story about consent, celebrity culture, and trying to figure out where women fit in a world that consistently devalues and disrespects their bodies.

Join us as we meet Olivia to discuss the book, her phenomenal articles (which cover everything from Bridgerton sex scenes to Paul Mescal's shorts) and the celebrities that we love to loathe.

As a journalist, Olivia specialises in violence against women, pop culture, relationships, mental health, sexual health, travel, fashion, and beauty. Her writing has been published in The Sunday Times, British Vogue, British GQ, Grazia, Stylist, Refinery29, The Independent, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The Sun, and The Huffington Post”.

Check out all the wonderful events upcoming for The Trouble Club. The fact that the club has expanded to Manchester and is growing is testament to its reputation and popularity. I am looking forward to attending some incredible talks. I have been a member of The Trouble Club for over a year and have got so much from it. Some amazing people, a welcoming and inspiring community together at some beautiful, unique and incredible spaces across London. Hosting some empowering and wonderful women. I would advise anyone who is even slightly interested in The Trouble Club to join. In addition to talks, there are members dinners, coffee mornings, social events, book clubs and much more. It is a very varied and rewarding experience. I have been so fulfilled being immersed in…

PARADISE in Trouble.

FEATURE: Groovelines: Ricky Martin - Livin' la Vida Loca

FEATURE:

 

Groovelines

 

Ricky Martin - Livin' la Vida Loca

_________

THERE is a starting point and inspiration…

behind me writing about Ricky Martin’s Livin’ la Vida Loca. Apparently, on 11th July, 1999, the song hit number one in the U.K. It may be a throwaway song for many people. Quite odd for people young now who never heard it in the 1990s. There is no doubting how important it is in pushing Latin artists to the forefront. The likes of Jennifer Lopez (her debut album, On the 6, was released in June 1999) swiftly followed and broke through. On 11th July, 1999, Ricky Martin became the first Puerto Rican artist to top the U.K. chart with this Pop classic. Livin’ la Vida Loca reached number one in twenty nations, including the U.S. One of the biggest songs of the 1990s, Livin’ la Vida Loca was also crucial in helping Latin music cross over to the mainstream. There are a couple of features I want to bring in that take us inside the song. What it means and the impact it had on the wider music culture. I will end with an interview with Ricky Martin from 2011 where he discussed the impact and importance of his best-known song. First, American Songwriter wrote about Livin’ la Vida Loca for a feature earlier this year:

When the Latin pop music explosion took hold in America starting in 1999, former Menudo singer Ricky Martin was at the forefront of the movement. He had released four Spanish language albums prior and had sold out stadiums throughout Mexico and South America. His Grammy Awards performance of “La Copa De La Vida” (“The Cup Of Life”) in February 1999 was this country’s introduction to a man who would soon crossover into the English language market and become a superstar in his own right.

Finding The Right Hit

Sony Music executives already knew they had a star on their hands, and this was a well-planned Grammy introduction to Martin as the debut single from his first English language album was arriving a month later in March 1999. Draco “Robi” Rosa (who had worked with Ricky Martin before and sung with Menudo) and Desmond Child (hit writer for Bon Jovi and KISS) were brought in to craft “Livin’ La Vida Loca” which featured big brass sounds and a twangy guitar melody. The duo wanted to come up with “The Millennium Party Song from Hell,” and they helped create an international sensation that kicked off the 2000s Latin pop craze. (They co-wrote other songs for the album as well.)

“The mandate was, you know, I had [to write] pop with some authenticity,” Rosa told NPR in 2021. “Push to be honest, push to be as real as possible. But make sure it’s pop. That it’s, you know, commercially — that there’s a potential. … I was channeling [Jim] Morrison. I mean, there’s elements of big band [and] a little bit of surf guitar.”]

In 2012, Child, who is half-Cuban, told Songfacts, “His [Martin’s] manager, Angelo Medina, thought there was a market in radio stations that were doing songs that were going back and forth between English and Spanish. He said, ‘Well, what if you do one song that’s kind of both?’ If you look at ‘Livin’ La Vida Loca,’ there really is very little Spanish in it. But when we presented it to the record company, one of the top executives came back to me and said, ‘Could you write that song in English now?’ I said, ‘It is in English.’ And in fact, when the first ads came out, he insisted that underneath ‘Livin’ La Vida Loca,’ in parentheses, it said, ‘Livin’ the Crazy Life.’ We were scratching our heads, like, Come on now, anyone who has ever gone to Pollo Loco knows what the word ‘loco’ is.

“That particular song had parts that sound like Spanish but aren’t. Like, ‘skin the color of mocha.’ ‘Mocha’ is an American term – we don’t say that in Spanish. But it sounded like Spanish. It took three days to work out the right combination of sounds and words. That’s pretty much the longest I had ever worked on a song before. That was before I started working in theater. These days it takes me three or four days to write a proper song.” 

A Global Smash and Lasting Impact

“Livin’ La Vida Loca” broke big across all borders. It went No. 1 in America, Canada, the UK, Mexico, and 13 other countries, and it went Top 10 in over 15 more. Global sales of the single surpassed 4 million units. Ricky Martin’s self-titled, English language debut, which also featured two songs written by Diane Warren, would spawn two more hits and go on to sell 7 million copies by January 2000. Martin had arrived in a big way.

In the wake of Martin’s success, other artists like Shakira, Enrique Iglesias, Marc Antony, and Jennifer Lopez also joined the chart-topping party. It was something new and refreshing, and it was a boost to Latin pop music worldwide. Since the 1980s the two big Latin crossovers had been Gloria Estefan and the Miami Sound Machine as well as Selena, but now the market had expanded considerably. There are those who would contend that the Latin pop trend then was nothing more than a marketing gimmick, but it did expose mainstream listeners to artists they might not have paid attention to before.

Today, “Livin’ La Vida Loca” has racked up a half billion views on YouTube and nearly 400 million plays on Spotify. The video features a ballroom full of sexy Latin dancers and an exuberant, hip-swiveling performance from Martin. It’s easy to see why his star rose so quickly”.

I am going to move to a large feature. One that dives into Livin’ la Vida Loca. A real framing of its creation. What was happening to Rickly Martin at the time. The impact of his smash hit. We have just past through Pride Month. Ricky Martin, as a gay man, was writing about heterosexual relations through most of his career. It must have been quite strange and tough for him to project this image that was seen as more acceptable and commercial. Not really able to come out in the 1990s and write more honestly. Rather than tainting Livin’ la Vida Loca, it is an observation. The song is not really about his lust and attraction. It is more about this entrancing and slightly ominous woman who lures you in and then leaves you reeling. A situation that many men might have been led into. Anyway, for their The Number Ones feature, Stereogum gave Livin’ la Vida Loca an 8/10 score:

The Latin pop explosion of 1999 was a fake thing that became real. It was a marketing strategy that worked well enough to evolve into a cultural phenomenon. To even talk about it, you need to get a few things out of the way right out front, like the fact that “Latin music” is not a genre. It’s a web of different sounds — some connected to one another, some not — that really only have a language in common. The Latinx artists who blew up and made hits in 1999 came from vastly different places and circumstances. Most of them were just making straight-up English-language pop music with occasional nods to the performers’ different heritages. But a lot of those stars did have one big thing in common: They were signed to the various different subsidiaries of Sony Music.

Tommy Mottola, a man who’s appeared in a bunch of these columns because of his marriage to Mariah Carey, is an Italian baby boomer from the Bronx, but if there’s any one figure most responsible for that boom, it’s him. Mottola found ways to push his artists, using their ethnicities as a marketing hook. A few years after the big boom year, Mottola admitted as much to Billboard: “There never really was a Latin explosion, but we used it to take gigantic advantage of it, and lots of our stars benefited from that.” (In 2000, while that whole boom was still happening, Mottola, by then divorced from Mariah, married another one of the artists he’d signed, the Mexican singer Thalía. Thalía’s only Hot 100 hit, the 2003 Fat Joe collab “I Want You,” peaked at #22.)

For Mottola’s strategy to pay off, he needed to open things up with the right performer and the right song. He had both. Ricky Martin had everything a record-label exec could possibly want. He had an intriguing backstory, and his boy-band past was especially attractive during the high boy-band era. Martin was talented, hard-working, and insanely good-looking. His acting career made him a familiar face in America, and his music had already made him a star around the world. A big-deal Grammy performance early in 1999 gained Martin a tremendous industry buzz. Martin also had “Livin’ La Vida Loca,” a goofy, eager-to-please earworm too immediate to be denied. Empires are built on songs like that.

There’s a whole lot of right-place/right-time in Ricky Martin’s story, but there’s also a ton of hard work. Few performers have been quite so driven to the spotlight, and few have soaked up quite so much attention without letting it drive them insane. Enrique Martín Morales grew up comfortably middle-class in San Juan. (When Martin was born, the #1 song in America was Sly & The Family Stone’s “Family Affair.”) Before Martin was 10, he was already starring in Puerto Rican TV commercials.

As a kid, Ricky Martin loved English-language arena rock, and he also loved the Puerto Rican boy band Menudo, a strange institution first founded in 1977. The producer Edgardo Díaz had an idea: He would collect a bunch of adorable kids, and he would keep that lineup of kids forever unstable. Menudo membership was always temporary. In a Logan’s Run twist, the members of Menudo would be asked to leave when they turned 16 or 17. This kept any of them from becoming famous enough to take control from Díaz, and it also made boy-band membership oddly attainable. Menudo were hugely popular around the Spanish-speaking world, but a good-looking Puerto Rican kid could become a member of the group. That’s what Ricky Martin did. 

Ricky Martin auditioned for Menudo a few times, and he got shot down for being too short, but he finally got to join the group in 1984, when he was 12. As a member of Menudo, Martin had to work tirelessly, pretty much forgoing his adolescent years. But Martin also got to travel and perform in front of vast audiences. Martin was a part of Menudo when the group released the 1985 English-language single “Hold Me,” which became their only Hot 100 hit, peaking at #62.

In grand Menudo tradition, Ricky Martin left the group at 17, and he moved to New York to study at NYU. Before classes even started, though, Martin dropped out. He was offered a role in a stage musical in Mexico City, and he took it. From there, he spent the next few years acting in telenovelas. While in Mexico, Martin started off his solo recording career, releasing a self-titled Spanish album. His first solo single, the 1991 ballad “Fuego Contra Fuego,” reached #3 on Billboard‘s Latin chart.

In 1994, after he’d released a couple of albums, Martin landed a guest-role on the short-lived NBC sitcom Getting By. From there, he was cast as a singing bartender on General Hospital. Martin kept that gig for about a year, but he didn’t like it much, so he went back into music. On his 1995 album A Medio Vivir, Martin moved away from sentimental balladry and into percussive dance jams, and that choice proved hugely successful. The album took off in places that didn’t typically go for Spanish-language music, like France and the UK. In America, A Medio Vivir went gold, and the banger “Maria” became the first Ricky Martin song to crack the Hot 100, where it peaked at #88.

Funny thing about “Livin’ La Vida Loca”: It’s not really a Latin pop song at all. It doesn’t come from any Latin tradition. Other than the title, the song doesn’t even involve the Spanish language. Desmond Child, who co-wrote the song with Ricky Martin’s old friend Robi Rosa, later told Songfacts that the two of them worked hard to give the song a flavor that might seem Spanish to people who had no experience with any kind of Spanish culture: “That particular song had parts that sound like Spanish but aren’t. Like, ‘skin the color of mocha.’ ‘Mocha’ is an American term — we don’t say that in Spanish. But it sounded like Spanish.” (One clueless label exec still asked Child if he could write a version of the song in English.)

But while those lyrics don’t make much use of the Spanish language, they do go pretty hard on Latin stereotypes. Ricky Martin crows about a temptress who intoxicate you to the point where you don’t even notice that she’s ruining your life. This image of the girl who will make you take your clothes off and go dancing in the rain has everything to do with fucked-up ideas about delirious passion that Americans love to ascribe to people from neighboring countries, though maybe it’s notable that the woman playing the role in the “Livin’ La Vida Loca” video was a Croatian model.

Musically, “Livin’ La Vida Loca” sounds awfully close to the big, bright, sunny ska-punk that was all over alt-rock radio in the late ’90s. The busy horn-stabs work as constant adrenaline-shots, and the baritone guitar owes something to instrumental surf-rock. The mix is jammed full of elements, these digital layers of sound that are almost overwhelming in their grandeur. (“Livin’ La Vida Loca,” it turns out, was the first #1 hit to be entirely recorded on ProTools.) One of the only moments where things get even remotely quiet — the bit about waking up in New York City in a funky cheap motel — is pure Warped Tour ska. (I wonder if New York City still has any funky cheap motels. Probably not.)

In Fred Bronson’s Billboard Book Of Number 1 Hits, Desmond Child says that “Livin’ La Vida Loca” is his attempt to channel the spirits of a couple of the 20th century’s most grandly glitzy entertainers: “We hired Randy Cantor to be our arranger and coaxed him to throwing in the kitchen sink. We added everything from whistles to gongs and horns and rock guitar and Spanish piano. At the time, Frank Sinatra had just passed away, so we were listening to Frank and swing. And I had this inspiration because Ricky reminded me of a Latin Elvis. So I had this vision of Ricky dressed like Elvis in a Las Vegas performance in all black, really moving and shaking.” This makes sense. “Livin’ La Vida Loca” is a song desperate to grab your attention, to entertain. That impulse isn’t native to any one particular culture. If it’s anything, it’s just plain ol’ American.

A song as wild and energetic as “Livin’ La Vida Loca” demands a singer who can really sell it, and Ricky Martin is up to the job. Martin’s enthusiasm is genuine and infectious. He never gets much of a chance to sing on the song. Instead, he just belts everything with a hammy flair that’s just perfect. In his overcharged gusto, Martin evokes no less a Vegas showman than Tom Jones. Even Martin’s ad-libs add to the atmosphere; every “come aaaown!” pushes the track that much harder. As the song reaches its climax, Martin is just whooping and bellowing and roaring, and it’s awesome. “Livin’ La Vida Loca” became so big that its canned enthusiasm came to seem a little oppressive, but when it hit at the right moment, it was glorious.

For the “Livin’ La Vida Loca” video, Ricky Martin worked with Wayne Isham, the guy who’d established the visual language of ’80s glam metal in his clips for Mötley Crüe and Bon Jovi. The “Vida Loca” video tweaks and updates that language, but it’s mostly the same — going for pure energy overcharge, just like the song. The video’s first shot is a car screeching around a corner and decimating a fire hydrant, and Isham smash-cuts from there into a club full of ridiculously hot dancers. The rest of the clip is a riot of bodies moving and cameras whirling. At the center of it all, Ricky Martin radiates the plastic handsomeness of a Ken doll, but he’s right in there, jumping around with the same enthusiasm as everyone else while bringing enough presence to hold the spectacle together. You couldn’t resist this guy, and you couldn’t resist this song, either.

Ricky Martin’s self-titled English-language album was a huge success. It sold seven million copies in the US alone, and it kicked open the door for the Latin pop explosion that Tommy Mottola envisioned, as we’ll see in this column in the days ahead. But Ricky Martin hasn’t been back in the top 10 of the Hot 100 since “She’s All I Ever Had.” Many of Martin’s later singles seemed like attempts to recapture the lightning of “Livin’ La Vida Loca.” The delightfully goofy “Shake Your Bon-Bon,” another single from the self-titled album, peaked at #22, while “She Bangs,” the lead single from Martin’s 2000 follow-up Sound Loaded, landed just outside the top 10, getting to #12. These days, too many of us sadly remember “She Bangs” as the William Hung song.

Sound Loaded was nowhere near as big as Ricky Martin, but it still went double platinum. While he was out promoting that album, Martin danced with George W. Bush at Bush’s 2001 inauguration, a moment that Jon Stewart memorably clowned on The Daily Show. (Since then, Martin has campaigned for every Democratic presidential candidate from Obama on.) After Sound Loaded, Martin largely went back to singing in Spanish, which made his presence on the American charts a whole lot more sparse but which probably helped keep his star bright around the world. Martin has kept recording ever since, and he’s done some acting, too — in Evita on Broadway, on The Assassination Of Gianni Versace on FX. For many years, Martin refused to answer persistent questions about his sexuality, but he came out as gay in 2010, and he got married in 2017. 

Ricky Martin remains hugely important as an inspiration to future generations of Latin pop artists. That’s how he made his most recent appearance on the Hot 100. The reggaeton star Wisin collaborated with Martin and with Jennifer Lopez, an artist who will appear in this column very soon, on “Adrenalina,” a clubby 2014 single that peaked at #94. (Wisin’s highest-charting single as lead artist, the 2017 Ozuna collab “Escapate Conmigo,” peaked at #63.) Martin has also worked with Bad Bunny, quite possibly the biggest artist in the world right now, and he’ll spend this fall on a co-headlining arena tour with Enrique Iglesias, another artist who will soon appear in this column.

In 1999, the hype surrounding Ricky Martin was deafening. “Livin’ La Vida Loca” was a single that lived up to that hype, one that very nearly translated all that manufactured excitement into tangible musical form. That kind of hype can totally derail a career. Fortunately, Martin never seemed to worry too much about keeping that high going. Instead, Martin has maintained relevance without desperately chasing it. We probably won’t see Ricky Martin in this column again, but he seems like he’s doing great these days, even as his life has presumably gotten significantly less crazy”.

I am going to end with an interview from 2011. Life definitely changed radically for Ricky Martin in 1999. Ending the decade with a massive chart success, it would have been a hit-spinning and mad time. In the interview, Martin explained how Livin’ la Vida Loca has this fun sound. Fusing horns, Latin rhythms and Pop sensibilities, it is a fun and insatiable cut. One that stands up to this day. A radio staple that is impossible to dismiss:

Since waking up in New York City "in a funky cheap hotel" back in '99, Puerto Rican-born Ricky Martin - or Enrique Martin Morales to his mates - has kept the Latin-pop fever alive for over 15 years with countless international chart-toppers to his name. Bringing together all of his hip-shaking hits for the first time for a UK audience, we caught up with Ricky to chat about his upcoming one-off show in London and what he plans to do next.

What can we expect from your UK show in July?
"It's a very international show musically speaking - it's influenced by every culture. It is provocative and it's erotic, but very beautifully done. Giogio Armani has been a very important part of the tour and he's not going to put his name to something that is not well done. It's very theatrical. It's deep, profound and it'll make you think."

What has the reaction been like from the crowds so far?
"It's like they're rediscovering me. I'm even rediscovering me! I'm still the same entertainer with the same passion and the same hunger for an audience to have a good time. It's a really cool frequency between the audience and the stage right now - the audience really want to be a part of the show."

Have you re-swizzled any of your hits for the show?
"There are some songs that must not be touched because the audience really appreciates hearing them the way they were born. I just want to discover and rediscover a sound - it's not changing a melody, it would be just trying a new arrangement. 'Livin' la Vida Loca' has gone from heavy hardcore rock to being exclusively influenced by ska and it's been urban as well! Right now it's back to the beginning."

Why do you think 'Livin' la Vida Loca' was a worldwide hit?
"Well, musically speaking it's rich. It has a fantastic fusion of cultures from rock to ska to Latin, with the horns. During my sabbatical I spent two years not listening to my songs at all. Then one day I walked into my studio and I just pressed play and 'Livin la Vida Loca' came on and I was like, 'What the f**k is up with this track?' - I don't want to sound arrogant, but I thought, 'This is perfect'. The multi-cultural influence, the harmonies, the story - it's a really fun track. The timing of it all was really good too - Latin sounds at the turn of the year 2000 were of the moment. The cosmos was manifesting in a very powerful way for that track to be a success."

When working on new music do you strive for another 'Livin' la Vida Loca'?
"Oh man, that is too painful! Yeah, of course you jump into that mode every once and while, but you can't get too caught up with it because you start to limit yourself. My goal is to think of nothing when I'm writing a song because too many influences could sabotage a potentially amazing song. When I'm working I think, 'If something like that comes, fantastic - hopefully something better will show up - but most importantly let's just do music in the moment when the keys and the melodies are blending
”.

I was just  leaving high school when Livin’ la Vida Loca hit the top of the U.K. chart. It was a great year for Pop music. 1999 was full of interesting and innovative sounds. Some really great breakthroughs. You had everyone from Ricky Martin, Jennifer Lopez and Britney Spears. These legendary artists making their first big steps. A song that, twenty-five years ago, was critical in ensuring that Latin artists broke into the mainstream, you have to commend Ricky Martin. All these years later, it is impossible to shake the allure of the track. Still sounding so fresh and colourful. A worldwide chart success, I think that it thoroughly deserved…

ALL of its plaudits.

FEATURE: There Goes a Tenner: Highlighting My Favourite Kate Bush Moments

FEATURE:

 

There Goes a Tenner

IN THIS PHOTO: Del Palmer and Kate Bush at the London Planetarium on 9th September, 1985, for the launch of Hounds of Love/PHOTO CREDIT: Dave Hogan/Getty Images 

 

Highlighting My Favourite Kate Bush Moments

_________

I have not done a feature about this before…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush with Tom Jones at the South Bank Sky Arts Awards in 2012, where 50 Words for Snow won for Best Pop/Pop Music (Bush posted a message to her website about the event)/PHOTO CREDIT: Richard Young/Rex Features

so I thought it was time to reveal my ten favourite Kate Bush moments. Rather than discussing albums, singles or anything like that, I am talking more about what she has done outside of the studio. Don’t get me wrong. There are plenty of studio moments that I think should be treasured and spotlighted. From Wuthering Heights to her donkey braying on Get Out of My House, this is something I might explore in the next feature. There are some key moments that stick in the mind. Some are funny and weird, the others are more normal. For some reason, these are ones I recall when I think about Kate Bush. They can be short and sweet or longer and more dramatic. I feel every Kate Bush fan would have their ten iconic/standout Kate Bush moments. The ones they call to mind when we think of her. I am going to discuss them in no particular order. That said, the first I want to bring up is the most recent of the list. I covered this for a recent feature. It is her 2022 interview with Woman’s Hour. This came after Bush hit number one with Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God). The track, which features on Hounds of Love and was originally released in 1985, was used in Netflix’s Stranger Things. There are multiple reasons why this moment is so special. Nobody really expected an interview at all. Bush communicated some messages through her official website. Prior to that, we had not heard an interview about her music since 2016. It was a long wait. One that was worth it. Bush, speaking from her home on a landline, chatted to Woman’s Hour’s Emma Barnett. They chatted about the success of Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), what she (Bush) is doing at the moment – gardening, mostly -, and how long Kate Bush had been watching Stranger Things (prescription viewing in the Bush household). No doubt one of the very best and most heartwarming moments in Kate Bush’s career. For the fans like me at least.

Next in the list is one of the interviews I am going to source. There are many memorable ones to choose from. One of the absolute best is very early on. In 1978, when Kate Bush was starting out and people were struggling to define her and what to make of the music, there were a lot of interviews that where Bush was belittled or patronised. Almost treated like a girl or someone who didn’t believe in music. This interview from March 1978 is an example of an interviewer treating Kate Bush with respect. A serious and warm conversation about her music. Kate Bush is very mature and intelligent. She can handle odd and offensive interviews. On this occasion, there was no need for any shields or defensiveness. Instead, we got a real feeling that she was being treated as a serious artist doing something very special. There are a lot of wonderful interviews with her. Ones that stand in the mind. I wanted to highlight this one, as it comes so early in her career. In fact, only a month after her debut album came out. So many people were confused by The Kick Inside. The world had not really heard anything like it. Maybe it is understandable it would be difficult to digest an artist so original and different to everything around her. The interviewer, whose name I can’t seem to find online, is professional and respectful. This March 1978 interview has been highlighted across the media. A real test of Kate Bush’s nerves and maturity, it always comes to mind when I think of her.

I will get to another interview soon. Breaking away from that, it is worth thinking about award ceremonies. No stranger to them at all, Bush has collected a few awards through her career. One of the most recent is when she attended the South Bank Sky Arts Pop Award ceremony in 2012. 50 Words for Snow (2011) won for Best Album that year. Rightfully scooping the prize, it is one of the most recent public appearances from Kate Bush. Aside from 2014’s Before the Dawn, there was not that many occasions where she was out in the public eye. Not since the 1990s anyway. It is always nice seeing Kate Bush out there and being celebrated. I can understand that she may want to avoid this sort of limelight. We have not really seen her pick up awards recently. Someone needs to give her one pronto! There is another award ceremony, in 2014, when Bush won an award for Before the Dawn. That was at the Editor’s Award from the Evening Standard. In the space of a couple of years, two examples of Kate Bush being recognised for her pioneering work. Two cases of her being humbling and very sweet. Quite shy and overwhelmed. I chose the 2012 acceptance speech because of the crowd reaction. So much love and affection in the room that night! Presented to her by Tom Jones, you can see the joy on her face. Perhaps a little taken aback by the whole thing. This is why I hope that we again see Kate Bush take to the stage and collect an award. She is long overdue some sort of recognition. Again, I might well explore this in a feature.

Coming later, I will return to videos and the audio. I am going to include one more audio nugget. In fact, it is a feast for the eyes. Transmitted on the BBC in 1980, Deliah Smith spoke with Kate Bush about vegetarianism. This interview might also make it onto many people’s top ten Kate Bush moments. For a start, it has nothing to do with her music. Not really. It is a rare occasion when things shifted away from music. It is an interview that hits all the senses. In an idyllic and peaceful setting (the Bush family home of East Wickham Farm) and this almost tangible taste and smell. We get to see all these amazing dishes. In many ways, this interview was ahead of its time. An artist discussing the benefits of a vegetarian diet. There is also this wonderful mix of Kate Bush’s various sides. When she said she didn’t like the thought of harming animals. In a different interview, Kate Bush said how she felt vegetables almost had souls. Bush revealed how, when she first became a vegetarian, she lived a little bit on tea and chocolate. Realising this was not a healthy alternative, she then discovered these vegetarian dishes. How she could eat well on that diet. When she was eating meat, Bush explained how she did not realty eat vegetables. That changed when she became a vegetarian.

I am going to move away to a slightly different area. More of a photographic memory. In fact, it is in 1985. When Kate Bush premiered Hounds of Love. On 9th September, 1985, she promoted the album at a very special place. This is more of a deep-cut Kate Bush highlight. Rather than mention the album itself, I wanted to single in on this event. A few reasons why it is in my top ten Kate Bush moments. For one, it did seem like a career high. There is another photographic moment that will be mentioned soon. The photo of Kate Bush and Del Palmer (her then-boyfriend, we sadly lost him last year) together. It is the one at the very top of this feature. They looked incredible. So fashionable and cool, it was a very big moment. Kate Bush, possibly at her most chic, beautiful and captivating. Del Palmer looked so sharp and amazing. I can only imagine how incredible it was for those who were around Kate Bush that night. It was such a great time for her. A week later (16th September, 1985), her masterpiece was released. Capturing this very time of change, the photo I have included and feel is among the most beautiful. There is another shot of her at the Planetarium with her jacket off and she is leaning against some sort of rigging. Holding onto it with a smile on her face. Dave Hogan is the one who shot Kate Bush that night. Bush is relaxed and full of joy. Perhaps knowing she had made this timeless album, we got to see her shine and radiate. A wonderful moment in her career that so many fans cherish!

Keeping in 1985, one of my favourite Kate Bush moments is when she performed Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) on Wogan. She performed on his show more than once.. Always so memorably. I feel this performance is her best on the show. The promotion Bush did in 1985 was insane! So many outings, interviews and appearances. She travelled all around and barely got a time to sit and relax. I love the Wogan performance. The aesthetics of the set makes the performance so memorable. Kate Bush and her backing band (including Del Palmer and her brother, Paddy) looking like druids. Dressed in brown robes, it was a contrast to the purples of Hounds of Love. That is the colour I associate with the album. Not only because of the album cover design and lettering. The video shows Kate Bush dressed in purple. One might expect that when she performed in live for Terry Wogan in 1985. Instead, we get this brown. A palette that maybe contrasts from many people’s visions of the song. A muddier and murkier colour for such a vibrant song. The performance is wonderful too. Even though it is mimed, there is this sense of theatre and effort. Not another artist phoning-in a performance. So arresting and memorable, I think that this performance is one of the best from Kate Bush.

Four more to go. I could not let the first night of Before the Dawn go by. I was not there at all – and did not get to any of the twenty-two dates -, though it was historic and seismic. On 26th August, 2014, Kate Bush stepped onto the stage for this residency. At Hammersmith’s Eventim Apollo, she was met with awe and rapture from thousands of fans. Many who had travelled from very far away. This real congregation. A mix of lifelong fans. Celebrity newbies and everyone in-between. I remember that first night and all the media attention. This real sense of it being an event. The speculation of what the show would be like. People did not know. What they were met with was something life-changing. One of the highlights was Kate Bush performing Hounds of Love’s second side, The Ninth Wave. It was the first time she performed it in full. A realisation of this wonderful suite. Something cinematic and epic. I would loved to have been at that concert. I have heard from people who were there and they all say the same thing: it was one of the best moments of their lives. Objectively one of the greatest Kate Bush moments, I think about it a lot. We are coming up to the tenth anniversary  of a major event. That opening night for Before the Dawn. Even though I was not there, I felt this palpable sense of wonder and excitement through social media and wider. Reflecting now, almost a decade later, the shockwaves and reverberations are still going.

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush performing during 2014’s Before the Dawn residency/PHOTO CREDIT: Ken McKay/Rex Features

There are countless Kate Bush photos I could select that stand in the mind. Many of them shot either by John Carder Bush (her brother), Guido Harari or Gered Mankowitz. Again, repeating myself here, I could dedicate a feature to the best photos. The one I have selected is so eye-catching and memorable. Photographed by Clive Arrowsmith in 1981, there are two reasons why I have chosen this photo. One of Bush wrapped in ivy. She would release a track, Under the Ivy, as a B-side to Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) four years later. She looks majestic and beguiling in the photo. The expression on her face is one of slight sadness. Arrowsmith explained how Bush was in a bad mood and downcast when she was photographed. It was not an instruction. You have this photo taken at a very interesting point in her career. There is a lot of mystique coming from the photo. Also, why was Kate Bush unhappy that day?! In 1981, after she had released Never for Ever (1980) but before The Dreaming (1982), there is this transition. A growth and evolution of an artist. Perhaps burnt out with recording and stress, we get a moment that shows the young Kate Bush perhaps at her most human. Not having to affect a smile or not wanting to, there is also this ethereal and almost artistic vibe to the photo. This slightly tired and unhappy subject looking gorgeous and almost like an art exhibition. It is a photo that I think about. What the atmosphere was like in the studio. If Kate Bush said much. How things were left. What we do get is a couple of wonderful and evocative shots. Some of the bets ever taken of her.

PHOTO CREDIT: Clive Arrowsmith

Two more choices to go. It was hard whittling them down. The final one relates to a message on her website. The penultimate moment I want to choose and discuss is an interview. Again, there are loads that I have missed out. I am going back to 2005. This is the year Aerial was released. It was seen as a big return. Kate Bush’s interview with Mark Radcliffe sticks in the mind. For a start, it was a chance to hear Bush speak about her new album. Her only double album. One we waited twelve years for. Any interviews from that time are precious and to be studied. Allowing Radcliffe a lot of time, I love the interview because there is that respect being paid. Mark Radcliffe had this campaign where he dreamed of interviewing Kate Bush. Almost like a personal aim. Something he talked about on radio. This interview was broadcast on BBC Radio 2. There are some nice and affectionate moments. Bush questioning some of Radcliffe’s remarks or observations. Allowing so much time for the interview to breathe, we got a real insight into Aerial. It was a wonderful and deep interview. Fans might have other choices they would put above this. For me, it stands out as a really important interview. One of a few long ones she did in 2005 – her chat with John Wilson also comes to mind. At this time when we welcomed her back (after 1993, we did not think there would be a twelve-year gap!), it was like she never left. The same amazing and incredible artist. Someone making music of the highest order. Just hearing her voice. Go and listen to the whole interview if you can (I cannot see one single YouTube video for it; it is divided into multiple parts).

The final selection in my top ten favourite Kate Bush moments might seem mundane and unspectacular. I include it because it is the most recent post from her website. The newest communication from fans. Some look at her messages for clues that she is recording new music. That she may grace us with something big. In fact, it is technically isn’t the latest message. It is the latest written by Kate Bush herself. A poignant one. It relates to the death if Del Palmer. He died on 5th January this year. Kate Bush posted a message on 10th January. We have not had another one since then. The final words, “I’m going to miss him terribly”, seem like an understatement. Losing her friend and former partner, Palmer was also on many of her studio albums as a player. He was there for The Tour of Life in 1979. Her sidekick and confidante for many years. Someone very special for her. It may seem like a rather sombre note to end on. It is tender and sincere. Rather than saying nothing or writing this long message, Bush kept it short but meaningful. It is always brilliant when we hear from her. I know that the next message will be more optimistic and music-based. I love this message because we wondered if Kate Bush would react to the death of Del Palmer or say nothing. It must have been impossible for her to process the news. I shall leave it there. Maybe you have your own top ten Kate Bush moments. I’d love to hear them. So many possibilities to choose from! I was keen to share mine. Thinking about them makes me want to dig deep and explore more. It shows that, when it comes to Kate Bush, that there is always…

SO much to discover.

FEATURE: Encore: Recognising the Stamina and Resilience of Modern Day Touring Artists

FEATURE:

 

Encore

IN THIS PHOTO: Beyoncé during her Renaissance World Tour

 

Recognising the Stamina and Resilience of Modern Day Touring Artists

_________

IT might have always been the way…

IN THIS PHOTO: Taylor Swift during her Eras Tour/PHOTO CREDIT: John Shearer

yet I feel it is more obvious how intense and hard touring is. Artists are in competition with each other to get attention. With most artists’ revenue coming from touring, it does seem that they are pushing themselves to the limit. This has negative and positive repercussions. On the one hand, you have artists who are delivering the most amazing sets. More ambitious and wide-scale. There is also the effect on mental health. This important book is a guide for artists. Surviving life on and off of the road; putting mental health first is paramount. I think that the mental effects of touring can be as severe as the physical ones. Maybe there is something inbuilt with artists. They seem to have this resilience and energy that means they can go on stage and captivate in such an effortless way. I am thinking about artists like Taylor Swift. Say what you want about her music and the negatives – the use of private jets is not the best message to send out – but her stamina is unbelievable! Think about all the shows she does. How long they last. How far she has to travel. It is the same for icons like Madonna and Beyoncé. One could say some of the old guard like The Rolling Stones and Paul McCartney are still at their peak. Taylor Swift is a good example. The way she can perform on this gigantic tour and really deliver night in night out. She doesn’t even pick up a cold! That is the thing with artists. If they get ill, it can be almost impossible to perform. Having to weight up what toll it will take on them and how many gigs they might have to cancel, it can be scary stepping onto the stage. Testament to their strength, it is inspiring seeing artists keep going and stay strong.

One never knows how much is going on beneath the surface. What toll touring takes on their minds. If you think about huge bands and solo artists, they have to go through rehearsals. That whole preparation side can be draining. They also have to promote on social media in addition to promoting through the media. All the components of a tour is overwhelming. This has always been the way, yet there seems to be this extra pressure. Ticket prices are rising. Artists feeling like they need to justify this. Maybe not something smaller artists have to consider, I know that life for them is still hard. Staying fit and healthy so that they can give fans a top quality show. So that they can remain on the road and fulfil their commitments. If the likes of you or me can make it into work with a cold or a real lack of energy, we can also consider taking a few days off. I do think that, in such a competitive time, that any day off or one down because of illness, can make an artist feel stressed. That makes things worse. Others maybe soldiering on because they feel like they’ll let their fans down. Every time I see a festival headliner or an artist touring the world during this really long sets, I wonder how they do it. It seems almost superhuman that they can do that once, let alone dozens of times. I think that we need to remember this whenever we criticise someone or talk about ticket prices. Sure, things can get extortionate when you get to the major artists. Even so, with the length of shows and everything that goes in, it doesn’t seem as unreasonable. I do like the fact that we get these world-class live spectacles today. It is also brilliant that smaller venues are hosting the stars of the future. It makes it even more important that they remain open and profitable. At a moment when many are closing and struggling, their vitalness needs to be underlined and financed.

PHOTO CREDIT: Polina Tankilevitch/Pexels

I know that some people prefer live sets that are more sparse and just about the music. Not any big sets, lightning and concepts. However you prefer your live music, there is no denying how essential it is. How it is brings people together. I am not sure whether we understand just what artists put into a live show. How tiring it is touring. When you see an artist on the stage doing a twenty-song set or more, consider what that does to their body and system. To do that for one night would take most of us down. The way they need to be in peak physical condition. Even if a set is less about movement and more about the vocals, there can be vocal strain and dangers. Artists risking that every time they get onto the stage. I love how artists are able to give fans such a spectacular show every night. Not many of us truly appreciate how much stamina and strength is required. From a globe-straddling Taylor Swift to a new band coming through plying their trade at local venues, artists should be commended for their passion and ability. I have had a cold for a month now and could barely function in an office job. They have to go on stage and really push their bodies each night. I know that nobody is perfect. Artists can turn up late or not be at their best. There can be problems and cancellations but, by and large, you are lucky enough to be at this transformative and unifying experience. All of this should definitely…

NOT be taken for granted.

FEATURE: Second Spin: Imelda May – 11 Past the Hour

FEATURE:

 

 

Second Spin

 

Imelda May – 11 Past the Hour

_________

THERE are a couple of reasons…

why I want to include Imelda May’s latest studio album in Second Spin. The Irish songwriter turns fifty on 10th July. An incredible artist who I don’t think gets enough credit and airplay, the phenomenal 11 Past the Hour is among her best work. Released on 16th April, 2021, the album features collaborations with, among others, Ronnie Wood, Gina Martin and Shola Mos-Shogbamimu. I don’t know how many people know about the album. You can buy it here. I do think that Imelda May is one of the most astonishing and multitalented artists of her generation. I am going to get to some reviews of the wonderful 11 Past the Hour. Some reviewers felt the album distilled May’s talents. It was a bid for commercial appeal at the expensive of her authenticity and personality. Others felt the album had some songs that sounded like they were from other artists. Perhaps not as sharp and defined as albums like 2010’s Mayhem or even 2017’s Life. Love. Flesh. Blood. I think that 11 Past the Hour is a rewarding and rich album. There are one or two weaker tracks through, for the most part, it is a very strong and memorable release. Before getting onto some positive reviews, I am going to start with an interview from HMV. It seems like 11 Past the Hour was a chance for Imelda May to break away from a narrative. To explore new ground and possibilities:

When did you start work on the songs for this album? Were you writing on tour?

“I need to wind down after tours, I can’t just set the wheels straight in motion. It was lovely this time. I didn’t give myself a timetable, I just wrote for myself, as and when I wanted to. I mostly finished before the lockdown, but I added a couple of extra bits. I ended up with a lot of songs.”

How did you find streamlining that down for what became the final album?

“There were a few songs that I really wanted to keep, but I don’t like long albums. I don’t like overstaying my welcome, I want to leave people wanting just a little bit more. These are my absolute favourites and the songs I knew would work alongside them.”

Did you have a goal of how you wanted this album to move on from Life Love Flesh Blood?

“No, I just write as I feel. If I let myself move and progress on a personal level then I know my writing will follow. I was happy with where I was in my life. I didn’t need to feel like I was driving at something, I knew I’d progress in my own way.”

You’ve got some great guests on there. Noel Gallagher, Ronnie Wood, Miles Kane, how did those collaborations come about?

“I knew each of them. I don’t believe in things being set up by labels or management, things are better unfolding naturally. I’ve known Miles for a long time and I was delighted when he said yes. I don’t know if ‘What We Did In The Dark’ would have made the record without him. I just knew he’d be perfect, we had so much fun. It was the same with Ronnie and Noel, they liked the songs and we went from there.”

Were you able to physically be there with any of them? Or did it have to be done remotely?

“No, I was there with each of them. It was done within all the rules, hardly anybody in the studio, all the doors opened, separated appropriately. I like to be in the room with people I’m working with, the vibe is so important to the song.”

Must have made for a different experience, having to be careful when you’re used to being free in those scenarios…

“Recording was done all before lockdown and I was able to get the bones down with the musicians. It is weird. Of course, it is. But the vibe is still there and that transcends everything. The vibe of the songs was bigger than the Covid-19 guidelines.”

Would the album have come out sooner if it wasn’t for the pandemic?

“Oh yes. Much sooner. I think everything was just figuring out how to go about putting out an album in the midst of all this. I’ve had three tours cancelled now. In the end, I’ve just decided I want this album out. Normally it’d coincide with a big live plan, but I just want it out. The tour isn’t until next April now, but I can’t wait another year. I feel like we need new music. People are gasping for new music. The love I’ve felt from these latest singles has been more than for anything else I’ve ever done. That convinced me. I love this album, I want people to have it.”

You’ve talked in other interviews about it being an album with a lot of love. Is that something you were aware of during the writing or something you’ve only discovered after it was all done?

“That was definitely afterwards. In other interviews, they’ve been trying to make me nail down a theme. I don’t know. I love letting the song lead me. I’ve restricted myself in the past and I’ve made myself stick to a narrative and I don’t want to do that anymore. It kept coming up, so I thought about it, I was lying in bed going over the songs and it’s love, all kinds of love. Romantic love, lustful love, fighting for love, acceptance and opening yourself to love. There’s even a song written from the perspective of Mother Earth, written during the bushfires and laying waste to the Amazon. ‘Made To Love’ is from love’s own perspective. Now I know it’s the theme, I’m very happy about it, I just didn’t know it beforehand.”

If a song needs to lead you, does that mean you discard songs very quickly if they’re proving difficult?

“Not necessarily. I do during the writing process. I co-wrote with a few different people, mostly with Tim Bran and Davide Rossi, but also with Pedro Vito and Sebastian Sternberg. I’m a lyricist. I write lyrics and poems daily. I need people for the arrangement who can lead me somewhere I wouldn’t go myself. Every session they’d come along and play me things they’d been working on, then we’d take it on. That takes you in all kinds of different directions. You have to wait for something to move you, then my hand can’t keep up with my head. That’s in the writing, but if a song makes it through that and into recording, sometimes it’s tricky.”

Do you lose something?

“Something just doesn’t sit with it. That’s when you have to decide, is it worth working on or should I let you? If I know I’ve written a good song, I’ll stick with it, I’ll try and find a way. I won’t give up easily when you’ve got that far.”

Is there a track on the album that’s a particular example of that?

“‘Made To Love’, I almost let it go. I was happy with the song and what Tim and Davide had done. It moved me from the start and I came up with the lyrics and melody quite quickly. We had the bones of it down, but when it came to recording, something really didn’t gel. Everyone had done everything right, but it didn’t gel with me, it didn’t feel like it had enough rawness.”

How did you fix it?

“Everybody needs people who are very, very honest. People who will be straight with you. Bono is one of those people for me. I don’t talk to him a lot, but he’s there when I need him, especially if I’m really stuck. I told him what was happening and he said ‘Send to me and I’ll have a listen’. I asked him what he thought and if I should get rid of it? He said: “Absolutely not! Keep working on the chorus. You have something”. It was ‘Don’t Be Afraid To Love’ and he suggested flipping it and giving it a positive spin and he was right. It changed the song completely.”

It’s a messy, unpredictable process…

“It is, but it helps to have people who know what they’re doing and who’ll be straight with you. If you play it to family and friends, it’s difficult for them to disassociate from you personally. I just couldn’t put my finger on what was wrong. I’m so glad Bono told me to stick with it and keep going.”

He’s written a hit or two in his time…

“He knows his s**t for sure. Sometimes if you have a negative lyric with a positive chord sequence, if you flip that on its head and have a positive sequence with a negative sequence, it turns the song around. Gives it a new balance.”

When did you decide that 11 Past The Hour was the right title for the album?

“It had been in my head for a while. ‘Breathe’ was the first song I wrote for the album, I’d just met Tim and Davide, it was the first day we wrote together and that was what came out and I was so happy. And I kept seeing the number 11 everywhere. It was weird. I started looking up some things and it turns out it’s a call in lots of different cultures over time. It’s a call for intuition and awakening and it’s led me down this path that includes paganism and pre-Christian Ireland."

"I started to dig into my heritage and it went into astrology and numerology. In Ireland, there’s this place called Newgrange, it’s 2,000 years older than the pyramids, it’s 5,000 years old! You can go inside and put your fingers in the grooves that somebody chipped away at 5,000 years ago. People who were creating art that they knew would last, art that they knew they would never see the end of, leaving things for future generations."

"That was all because of seeing 11:11. I wanted to tell a story with that song. I wanted to write a song that tells people it’s okay to still feel like a child and want to be scooped up and comforted and told it’s all going to be okay. That’s the perspective I wanted. Somebody to tell you ‘Dance with me, darling, everything’s going to be fine’. And, if you look on the album cover, I got this perspex piece of artwork made, it’s beside me on the bed. The reflection reflects off the headboard of my bed and it says 11:11. No planning at all!”

Among some of the more mixed reviews, there were plenty that were positive. Really dug into the album. This is what Irish Times had to say when they sat down with 11 Past the Hour. An album that I would very much advise people to listen to when they get the time. One worth buying:

The days of pigeonholing Imelda May as “the Irish rockabilly singer” are well and truly over. The Dubliner’s stylistic reinvention – kick-started with her 2017 album Life Love Flesh Blood – continues apace with her sixth album. Here, May sounds completely at ease with both the musician and the woman she has become, and that acceptance brings a soulfulness to songs such as Diamonds and swoonsome lullaby Solace.

Many of these songs address the intoxicating rush of new love. The seductive title track and Can’t Say nod to Dusty Springfield and Burt Bacharach’s songbook, respectively. Others take a more determinedly independent line, such as Different Kinds of Love and Made to Love, an anthem for acceptance.

In between, May mixes it up with some forthright contemporary pop-rock numbers. Just One Kiss, featuring Noel Gallagher on vocals and Ronnie Wood on guitar, is fine, thought a duet with Miles Kane on the brisk, seedy What We Did in the Dark sounds too out of step with the album’s tone.

Her collaboration with partner Niall McNamee on the lush Don’t Let Me Stand on My Own is altogether better, but the poppy stomp, dramatic strings and decisive air of menace on Never Look Back, the closing track, say it all: the old Imelda may not be completely gone, but this new era leaves no room for nostalgia”.

There are a couple of further reviews I want to spotlight, to argue the case for this brilliant album. If 11 Past the Hour passed you by the first time, then that is understandable. Released in April 2021, it was a very strange time. How willing people were to embrace music. In terms of buying it anyway. That is why I think that we need to re-investigate 11 Past the Hour. In their review, Hot Press found plenty to like when it came to Imelda May’s sixth studio album:

11 Past The Hour marks Imelda May’s first new full-length album in over three years, and it offers fans much to unpack.

The opening title-track delivers a more accessible spin on the literary style of Tom Waits or Nick Cave, employing visceral poetry over a musical backdrop that harks further back, to the music of Jacques Brel. It moves seamlessly into ‘Breathe’, another vivid tune – replete with sweeping strings – that finds May showcasing her superb vocal chops.

After the smooth, sultry openers, ‘Made To Love’ marks a notable departure. Over an uptempo arrangement not dissimilar to an ABBA-style Eurovision banger, May takes on the persona of universal love, as she sings about love as the antithesis of prejudice. When we arrive at the bridge, which is reminiscent of Lady Gaga’s ‘Born This Way’, May declares: “I’m every refugee, you see/ I’m every bum on every street/ I’m bi, I’m trans… I’m Africa, I’m Pakistan… I’m Irish, Palestinian...” There may be listeners who’ll see it as over-earnest, but May won’t care. With the help of activists Gina Martiin and Dr. Shola Ros-Shogbamimu on backing vocals, ‘Made To Love’ aims to both embrace and embody the inclusiveness that is – or should be – at the heart of the very idea of love.

The record picks up momentum again with ‘Don’t Let Me Stand On My Own’, a folk-tinged ballad drawing on May’s Irish roots. Another highlight is ‘Can’t Say’, which sees the singer’s husky voice at its most compelling. ‘Never Look Back’ bookends the record nicely, returning to the dark, creeping strings of the opening tracks.

In its big and generous heart, 11 Past The Hour is a fascinating, creative, and resonant offering from one of Ireland’s most renowned rock ‘n’ roll artists”.

I am going to wrap up with a review from AllMusic. It is clear that, from her fifth studio album, Life. Love. Flesh. Blood, there was this yearning (from May) for growth and change. An artist who was pushing her music to new places. This really comes through on 11 Past the Hour. It is an eclectic and arresting album with many highlight:

Having transformed her sound with 2017's empowered Life. Love. Flesh. Blood, Ireland's Imelda May continues her bold artistic metamorphosis with her sixth studio album, 2021's 11 Past the Hour. At turns dusky and ebullient, 11 Past the Hour builds nicely upon May's past work as she continues to move away from the twangy retro-rockabilly of her early years and fully embrace the anthemic, yet still organic pop/rock she showcased on Life. Love. Flesh. Blood. Co-produced by Tim Bran (James Morrison, London Grammar), the album finds May joined by an elite cadre of special guests, all of whom add their distinctive pop charisma to the proceedings. Early in her career, May's vintage-inspired Chuck Berry-esque rock caught the ear of Rolling Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood, who then brought her on tour with him in 2019. Here, Wood continues the goodwill, applying his crunchy electric guitar riffs to several tracks, including "Just One Kiss," a very Stonesy duet with another special guest, Oasis' Noel Gallagher. Wood also plays on "Made to Love" a soulful pop anthem featuring backing vocals by noted women's rights activists Gina Martin and Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu. That May, who has worked on charities dealing with homelessness and domestic abuse, chooses to spotlight two nonprofessional singers with strong activist voices speaks to the deeper messages at play in her work here. Equally uplifting is "Don't Let Me Stand on My Own," a folky and soulful Celtic duet with singer Niall McNamee that brings to mind Rod Stewart's '70s work with the Faces. May also brings along Last Shadow Puppets' Miles Kane for the wicked, Berlin-esque post-punk anthem "What We Did in the Dark." Thankfully, none of the guest choices seem overly calculated and primarily feel like natural additions to the album. Furthermore, while the duets are a highlight, May's solo work also shines here as she delves into the Johnnie Ray-meets-Portishead-sounding title track and proves her diva mettle on the rousing piano ballad "Diamonds." With 11 Past the Hour, May has crafted a generous, collaborative album that feels like she's lifting others up, just as they are lifting her”.

On 10th July, Imelda May turns fifty. I was thinking of celebrating that with a playlist. Mixing together her best album tracks. Instead, I wanted to focus on album of hers that did not get the love and true respect it deserves. Her latest, 11 Past the Hour, is well worth seeking out. I am not sure whether Imelda May has another album coming soon. Let’s hope so. This amazing artist is someone…

YOU should better acquaint yourself with.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Always on My Mind: Neil Tennant at Seventy

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

  

Always on My Mind: Neil Tennant at Seventy

_________

ONE of music’s true legends…

IN THIS PHOTO: Chris Lowe and Neil Tennant in 1987/PHOTO CREDIT: Cindy Palmano

turns seventy on 10th July. One half of Pet Shop Boys, I wanted to salute the magnificent Neil Tennant. I am keen to get to a playlist of incredible Pet Shop Boys hits and deep cuts. There are interviews with Pet Shop Boys from this year such as this and this. The duo (Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe) released Nonetheless in April. One of their best albums to date, it is their fifteenth studio album. It shows the consistency and brilliance of the duo. Here is some brief biography about Neil Tennant:

“Neil Tennant is a British singer and songwriter most famous for being part of the synthpop duo the Pet Shop Boys. Born in Newcastle in 1954, he moved to London in the 1970s to study and soon became part of the popular music world through music journalism. In 1981 he formed the Pet Shop Boys with Chris Lowe. They topped the charts with their re-released debut song "West End Girls" in numerous countries in 1985-6. Since then, they have released 65 singles, 14 studio albums and 3 soundtracks. Tennant has also done solo and other collaborative projects. In 1994 he came out as gay in Attitude magazine and has advocated on behalf of gay rights. He is patron of the Elton John AIDS Foundation”.

It is a shame there is not more in-depth biography about Neil Tennant. Considering he is such an iconic and beloved songwriter and lead, there will be more written about him as he approaches his seventieth anniversary. Whether you are a Pet Shop Boys fan or not, there are scores of songs in their catalogue impossible to ignore. From West End Girls to It’s a Sin, they have created some classics! I hope that the mixtape reveals some depths to the duo. You will get a lot of the classics, together with some deeper cuts. Alongside Chris Lowe, Neil Tennant has been responsible for some of the most memorable songs of all time. It is a collection of incredible gems from…

THE amazing Pet Shop Boys.

FEATURE: Army Dreamers: Revisiting the Thought of Two Different Kate Bush Projects

FEATURE:

 

 

Army Dreamers

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1993/PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari

 

Revisiting the Thought of Two Different Kate Bush Projects

_________

I have written about…

 IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1985

two different and distinct Kate Bush projects. Well, not ‘projects’ as such. Albums that would be welcomed. I am not sure whether we will get a new Kate Bush album anytime soon – or at all. It is always a risk and guessing game. I know that people bemoan the reissuing of her albums. She has done this a couple of times in the past five or six years. It is great that fans have access to her work. There is a desperation for something new from. I have stated how it would be great to have a DVD for Before the Dawn. The tenth anniversary of the start of the residency happens in August. I think a new documentary would be good. I do feel that there are two possibilities that fans would welcome. The first relates to a greatest hits or new collection. It would not be like reissuing albums. There has been a reissue of her rarities and B-sides. Rather than this being another retread, it would be a perfect chance and time for some of her best tracks, alongside a few unreleased or less-known numbers to sit alongside one another. We have not had a greatest hits collection since 1986. In terms of introducing new fans and pleasing existing ones, I do think that an album dedicated solely to her work is overdue. It would have its own title. The reason I bring this up is because the increased interest in Kate Bush’s music. It would not be an expansive album. Maybe a double vinyl and a version available on cassette and C.D., this would provide entry point for new fans. A chance to go beyond the big hits. Some would push back and say that this would be a bit too much. Considering the album reissues. Right now, we have so many people paying their respect to an artist who is still very much in the mix. Many might not be able to afford all the studio albums. Price is a factor. Re-releasing the same thing is not going to win everyone over. I don’t think we will see her studio albums get reintroduced and repackaged. I feel that a new album is a gamble. We can never say for sure either way.

I like the thought of this new greatest hits. Maybe a collection. Maybe it would offer little to those who have the albums and know her work. Even so, there could be this big market among those coming to Kate Bush fresh. Perhaps the song choices would be contentious. How would you limit it down?! I don’t feel it would be exploiting fans. Instead, so much has happened since The Whole Story came out in 1986. This is a new era for Kate Bush. A new generation have come on board. I still think there is a problem with younger listeners streaming Kate Bush rather than buying her music. Maybe they naturally go for Hounds of Love when thinking of a studio album. Sure, they could get a taster of her other studio albums from streaming sites. I do think that an anthology or slimmer greater hits collection would prove popular. Perhaps the last time there would be some retrospection. Clearing the path for new work. Or maybe a full stop to Kate Bush bringing out her music. That would be a sad thing. You know how many artists love Kate Bush. Are influenced by her. As I have written before, everyone from legends and music icons like St. Vincent and Björk take inspiration from her. Newer artists coming through such as The Last Dinner Party definitely have shades of Kate Bush. I know I am repeating myself to an extent. Great acts like The Anchoress are fans of Kate Bush. If you think far and wide, there is a wealth and world of artists who look up to her. I am heading ever closer to a documentary and getting them all together!

That is a feature and thought that I will explore later on. I do still believe there is a new documentary possibility. One where we do not need to see Kate Bush appear in. In terms of tribute albums, now more than ever seems like a  time to discuss it. It has not happened before. Uniting major artists and newcomers, maybe with poetry or spoken word, there is an album idea. One that would surely not find objection in the Kate Bush household. She knows how many artists are influenced by her. There have been minor collections of Kate Bush songs covered by other artists. Nothing especially memorable or authoritative. There was this wave of Running Up This Hill (A Deal with God) covers following its inclusion in Stranger Things and chart success. Ranging from the slightly good to the abysmal, I do think there is opportunity for a genuine reimagining of the song. Think of bigger tracks of hers that could be covered by an artist you would not expect to sing it. The most appealing reason to consider a tribute album is those lesser songs. The deeper cuts. Together with an anthology or greatest hits albums, an opportunity to bring perhaps a couple of dozen musical Kate Bush fans – and, you know, maybe others who could recite her songs or are not necessarily artists – together would be amazing. I am not sure what you would call it. DO NOT call it This Woman’s Work! Or Running Up That Hill. There are more interesting and original naming opportunities! Many might say that this could not happen because Kate Bush would not allow it. For a start, she would not have to. People can cover her songs and I don’t think that EMI or Fish People would necessarily need to give sign off. If there was a stricter route where Kate Bush would need to sign off, I think that she would not object. Touched by so many artists covering her work. There have been plenty of Kate Bush covers through the years. She is not that strict when it comes to allowing people to interpret her work. Maybe recording sessions at Abbey Road Studios. Amazing possibilities and combinations spring to mind!

There is a lot to be said for both ideas. In terms of drawing together existing work into a collection or single album, it is a step away from the studio albums purely. A chance to collect together single releases but also some different and deeper songs. At a time when so many major artists reissue their studio albums so shortly after they first come out, nobody could begrudge a Kate Bush greatest hits collection. I think that the collections that have come out – The Whole Story in 1986; This Woman's Work: Anthology 1978–1990 in 1990; The Other Sides in 2019 – are perfectly fine. There is room and justification to have something new in the world. A beautiful thing that could be kept by fans for so many years. I know it is not the same as a new album. I fear so many people are missing out on her work. Its full extent. Perhaps not a greatest hits, then: more a deeper dive from 1978 (her debut, The Kick Inside) to 2011 (her latest studio album, 50 Words for Snow). In terms of a tribute album. It does not signal an end of her career or some grizzly eulogy. It is also not opportunistic. It is a beautiful way of combining artists one might love to see collaborate with Kate Bush but may never. Those who have but have not tackled one of her songs. A fascinating glimpse into some of her beloved songs and some that people might not know. Who knows, seeing this love and demand for her music might well compel Kate Bush to at least think of the possibility of gifting the world with new music in the future. I can understand people’s reticence with what they might see as reworking old work or slightly repackaging it. I definitely don’t see that. Definitely when it comes to a tribute album. Instead, as there are magazine articles and books published about her, there is room and many valid reasons why we should have an anthology/greatest hits and a tribute album. When it comes to the amazing and hugely influential Kate Bush, we can never be done celebrating…

THIS woman’s work (bugger!).

FEATURE: Cosmic Love: Florence + The Machine’s Lungs at Fifteen

FEATURE:

 

 

Cosmic Love

  

Florence + The Machine’s Lungs at Fifteen

_________

A hugely impressive and important…

PHOTO CREDIT: Immo Klink

debut album turns fifteen on 3rd July. Fronted by Florence Welch, Florence + The Machine featured, in 2009, Christopher Lloyd Hayden, Isabella Summers, Rob Ackroyd and Tom Monger. Lungs is the amazing and epic debut from the group. Recorded across several studios – including The Smokehouse in London -, it featured incredible singles like Rabbit Heart (Raise It Up), Dog Days Are Over and Kiss with a Fist. Even though I really like all of Florence + The Machine’s five studio albums, I think that Lungs is still the best. Exhilarating, urgent but also full of layers and nuance. I wanted to mark the fifteenth anniversary of one of the most essential and important debut albums of this century. Lungs features production from James Ford, Paul Epworth, Stephen Mackey, Eg White and Charlie Hugall, with additional production by Isabella Summers. Lungs has been reissued several times: an expanded version, Between Two Lungs (2010), a digital E.P. subtitled The B-Sides (2011), and a Tenth Anniversary Edition (2019). I am going to get to features and reviews for Lungs. There are not that many press interviews with Florence Welch from 2009. I found one, from DMY, that I want to start out with:

Momentum has been building in earnest since the start of the year, with the debut album ‘Lungs’ hitting number two when it was released back in June. This summer’s slew of festival dates and a recent Mercury Music Prize nomination suggests the pace looks set to continue.

Despite the critical acclaim however, spend a few minutes with Florence and her music and you’ll find that she’s an odd candidate for mainstream approbation. Underneath the glossy production, ‘Lungs’ is full of witchy-woman weirdness and demented gothic fantasies: there’s something wonderfully vivid and violent about the noise she makes, most evident in the gleeful savagery of “Kiss With A Fist” and “Girl With One Eye”. She’s far more willowy and slight in the flesh than one would imagine, even having seen her on stage, and it’s hard to equate the soulful bellow with the porcelain girl perched on the sofa.

We get off to a guarded start – she seems a little aloof and polished, with a whiff of media-training, but she brightens up as the interview moves from small talk to art and angst. Once the conversation flows, she reveals an enthusiastic and scattershot brain, her mind wandering mid-sentence, gesticulating at random as she jumps from top to topic. By the time we’ve finished she’s bursting into spontaneous song sprawled on the pub floor. Her exuberance is infectious, and, as she leaves the room, I get the feeling that, at her very core, Florence cannot help but make music.

I know this sounds obvious, but I want to talk to you about the music. I think there is a really epic quality to the album…

Yeah, I think that’s a good word to use!

It’s not trivial kitchen sink observations, it seems to be far grander…

Y’know what, I think I have always had trouble writing – I can’t even write a diary – I’ve always found it hard to document real life. I try to remember things by items of clothing or strange things that happen. I think it comes from reading a lot – reading a lot of poetry and being interested in language and phrasing and things like that. I think I wanted to make things that wouldn’t stick out as a point in time, d’you know what I mean? Something that was more all-encompassing, more trying to create a landscape or feeling, or a nightmare that someone could walk through.

Something that would stand the test of time?

Yeah I think so. I wanted to make something that was classic rather than of the moment.

Self-doubt is obviously universal, but the violent imagery is something that’s often associated with male artists – like Nick Cave or Tom Waits. Are you conscious of being a ‘female singer’ at all?

Well, I think that throughout history there has been something really intoxicating about female performers. I know from having watched and being really inspired by them. I think it’s that mix of being really powerful and very vulnerable which is I think something that women can convey perhaps better, or perhaps it comes across better in women because we’re more emotional creatures. But that strength and fragility in one package, which I think is wonderful. I mean, going all the way back to Ma Rainey and early blues singers, I think people have always been interested in female singers.

Are there particular female singers that you’ve been inspired by?

Well, vocally Etta James and Eva Cassidy. I think Alice Glass from Crystal Castles, like, her performances just blow me away! It’s like this tiny little creature with such demonic presence. She’s completely mesmerising; terrifying and wonderful. I really though she was incredible. She seems like this really strong female presence and again it’s like that masculine and feminine conflict – taking yourself apart. The thing is a lot of my performance comes from watching male artists and like punk bands; that sense of domination, of controlling the stage and it being your domain. So it’s a real mix. It’s like an internal battle onstage, an exorcism thing.

These are obviously your musical influences, but on a wider artistic scale, where do you draw inspiration from?

I think it’s things that are beautiful and sad. Like the model for Millais’ Ophelia – what was her name? She died of pneumonia from modelling in the bathtub. [PR, helpfully: “Lizzie Siddal”] Lizzie Siddal! Thank you! I’ve been trying to remember that for as long as I have been talking about her. It’s a really great back-story to that – she was like a muse for a lot of the pre-Raphaelites and they were all really into lithium, and she was doped up in the bath and the candle went out and she didn’t want to move because he was so into his painting, and she got pneumonia and died. And it’s just that sense of beauty and sadness behind everything.

If you were trying to describe the feel of your music to someone who couldn’t hear it, is there a particular painting or image that you could point them towards that best describes the atmosphere you’re trying to create?

Oh… um…[pauses for thought] probably a mix of that woman who did the Exploding Shed , Millais’ Ophelia and that Jenny Holzer painting. Have you ever seen that one where it’s like “Don’t talk down to me. Don’t try to be nice to me. Don’t…”

Yeah, I know the one.

It’s just a bright pink painting – I’ve got a postcard of it – but it’s just so amazingly aggressive. It’s great!

Is there a particular track on the album that you’re most proud of?

I think probably “Cosmic Love” is my favourite. I think that one feels like it just happened so naturally out of half an hour. I wasn’t even thinking about it. I mean it didn’t even exist before that half an hour; none of it existed. Not on the piano, or going round in my head. It just suddenly appeared and it was perfect. Well, I thought it was perfect. At first I thought it was a bit too romantic even; but it’s not that romantic, it’s quite dark. But yeah, that’s my favourite one.

Are you working on anything new at the moment, or are you still just processing the album?

I’ve sort of started. I’ve written some other stuff. I’m just looking forward to getting back in the studio. I feel like this album’s out there, it’s doing its job and I’m getting to play it, which is really fun. But there’s this ‘dissatisfaction with self’ – “must create” – “I’m unsatisfied, I must make something, I must verify myself!” I feel like every time I come on stage those two sides of myself get put back together and it all makes sense. For a minute.

Can you be creative on demand? Do you think, “right I’m going to sit down and write an album over the next three months”, or is it a continuous process?

I think sometimes in my life I was most creative when I was doing other stuff, y’know, when I had a job, and went to Art College. It’s quite good to have it as a sideline I think. I might go and get a job! You get inspired by daily life more. This [the attendant PR and make-up artist and the back-to-back interviews she has already done this morning] can be a circus…

I imagine the process can be a bit too cerebral otherwise…

Yeah. It’s like, hmm, inspiration…[twiddles her thumbs]

Our photographer, Mikael, then proceeds to lie her on the carpet, where she looks suitably dead and tragic, and we continue the interview with intermittent breaks to accommodate Mikael’s directions and Florence’s spontaneous outbursts of song.

Mikael: Has anyone every told you that you look like Kate Bush?

[lying on her back] A couple of times, yeah.

Me: Do you get annoyed by comparisons to other people?

No. I mean, I think it’s just a way for people to understand it, and determinate if you like this you might like that… Thing is, my voice isn’t anything like Kate Bush’s. I think it’s the… well, she uses a lot of drums.

Perhaps it’s the persona. She’s got this whole – I hate to use the word – kooky thing going on…

Ah, the [mock American accent] ‘K word’… I’ll be like serious one day and not serious the next and everyone’s the same. Some days you’ll be tired and some days you’ll be… no-one’s ever one thing all the time, so it’s strange to be put into one persona.

Following a break in which she and Mikael compare tattoos, Florence is now posing for photos in front of a mirror on the wall

You said you couldn’t play any instruments when you first started out. Was it frustrating trying to communicate what you wanted to your band?

Well, I think because I can sing, it wasn’t frustrating. Making music was more like improvising, so it was such a rush when I found something that worked. So it was all about the feeling, and I think that comes across in the music. You can hear this absolute joy at being able to make sound. And building things out of my own ideas of what a song should be like was exciting. It was like building and experiments, y’know? With rhythms and chords. That’s why everything’s like “bang, bang. Stop, start.” It’s because I have no skill, I just have [theatrical whisper] enthusiasm!

So you try to convey your enthusiasm to the band and they interpret it?

Well yeah, but it’s kind of hard because you tell a really skilled drummer “well, you know, I want you to play the drums worse. Play it more like I play it!”. And then there’s no guitar on the album, so my guitarist has to make all these pedals to play like cello, or make a big weird electronic noise. But yeah, I think they understand it. They understand the passion…”.

I will move to an anniversary feature from Albumism. In 2019, they marked ten years of Lungs. I know there was some division among the press regarding Florence + The Machine. Many heralded them and Lungs, whereas others were a little less kind. Many writing them off. Lungs is still powerful fifteen years later. Even deeper cuts like Girl with One Eye and My Boy Builds Coffins are fascinating and should be played more:

Debut albums can be incredibly tricky things to navigate. On one hand, you have the freedom to completely be yourself and deliver something that is true to you. There are no proverbial chains restricting your process or tying you to your past. Your voice, should you have discovered its purpose at this early stage of the game, is completely yours to own and to do with what you want. If your newfound audience love it, then you have succeeded in gaining more than you previously had.

On the other hand, if for some reason they don’t take to what you are offering, then that will not only be your debut album, but it may also prove to be your final LP. The price of this untrodden path, it would seem, is somewhat unattainable, and just may be a one-off musical experience.

Luckily for us, Florence + The Machine were able to bless the world with their debut album Lungs—a thirteen-track affair (with eleven of the tracks co-written by Florence Welch herself) that delves into everything from rock, soul and a whole lot of indie pop. And whilst Welch is in a unique league of her own vocally, it would be hard not to draw inspiration, comparison if you must, from those that came before her, part Kate Bush, part Annie Lennox, and yet utterly Florence Welch. Not bad work for a then-fledgling singer-songwriter who at the time, was all of just 22 years of age.

The lead single “Kiss With A Fist” created some controversy at the time with the lyrics speaking to what appears to be domestic violence. Coupled with the somber tone of the lyrics, and a slightly aggressive sound deeply rooted in garage rock and elements of punk pop, Welch explained that the song was indeed not about domestic violence, but rather the strength and force that love can sometimes find two people engrossed in. The psychological aspect over the physical, a binding of emotions that firmly sits in fantasy, not reality. Whilst the song was a solid first single, both lyrically and musically, it failed to chart well.

Following in the footsteps of “Kiss With A Fist” was the second single “Dog Days Are Over,” a beautiful track that draws on the richness of indie pop, blues and even folk, which in turn, allows the vocal prowess and beauty of Welch’s voice to be placed on full display. The unexpected explosion of notes and sounds throughout the song also paved the way for a sound that would soon be firmly associated with the band. This single was the first time that the audience got to truly hear the ethereal, almost whimsical component to Welch’s voice, two qualities that would also stand in contradiction with her tone, a commanding force in its own right.

Upon closer listen to the album’s third single “Rabbit Heart (Praise it Up),” it is impossible to ignore the multi-layering of Welch’s vocals, giving the effect of a mass choir rolled into one hauntingly beautiful voice. Although the lyrics are shrouded in darkness (“This is a gift / it comes with a price / Who is the lamb / and who is the knife?”, it is again the contradiction of these lyrics, which are steeped in fear and coupled with an uptempo sound, that managed to prime the way for the band’s first bit of solid chart success, reaching # 12 in the UK charts.

Florence + The Machine were a welcome, if not slightly frenetic, change from the tabloid fodder that was engulfing fellow Brits like Lily Allen and Amy Winehouse at the time. Whilst both singers were delivering profound work even with all the turmoil that fame and the like was bestowing upon them, it was Florence Welch, the self-proclaimed geek with red hair and porcelain white skin, that was forging a path for a type of voice that had not been heard in quite some time. Hers is a voice that seems to call upon the past and yet is entirely entrenched in the present.

This maturity in her voice was never more evident than on the songs “Drumming Song” and the cover of Candi Staton’s “You’ve Got The Love,” both also released as singles from the album. With “Drumming Song,” a love song that swims in the awkwardness that love sometimes makes us feel, Welch conveys an intensity and desire that belied her two decades on this earth. “You’ve Got the Love,” a song of empowerment, again allows the then-novice Welch another opportunity to bring her voice and vulnerability to a well-loved, timeless classic, something that she does to perfection.

Given that nearly half the songs on the album were released as singles, it would be criminal to ignore the beauty and complexity of songs like “I’m Not Calling You A Liar,” “Cosmic Love” and the loss of love which “Hurricane Drunk” so painfully demonstrates. It is incredibly hard to imagine that someone so young was able to write about so much loss; loss of love, loss of one’s self, and yet still convey a type of positivity. The loss is temporary, but the love is for a lifetime, or so we are somehow led to believe if we look and listen a little deeper.

At first glance, it could have been easy to dismiss Lungs as yet another British band delivering the stock standard indie pop of the time, along with splashes of rock and punk wrapped up in a neatly produced album. In some ways, that isn’t such a far-fetched idea. With a production team that consisted of accomplished soundsmiths like Paul Epworth (Bloc Party), James Ford (Simian Mobile Disco, Arctic Monkeys), Stephen Mackey (Pulp) and Charlie Hugall (Halsey, Ed Sheeran) who also offered writing support, Lungs ensured that the group became something far greater than just another one-hit wonder. Both Ford and Mackey also brought invaluable experience as band members, giving way for both the technical and artistic perspectives to meet, creating an organic approach which guaranteed that this album was only going to ever be considered nothing short of superb”.

I am going to end with a few reviews for the spectacular Lungs. The first is from DIY. They stated how, with so much hype surrounding Florence + The Machine leading up to Lungs, that it could have been a disappointment. Critics were very much forced to eat their words and sneers when the album did come out:

After the sheer amount of hype (including a Brit Award!) that Florence and the Machine has been receiving for the past six months or so we were convinced that debut album ‘Lungs’ stood not a cat in hells chance of living up to it. We were spectacularly wrong. ‘Lungs’ is an extraordinary contemporary pop triumph. A fresh, new, individual and exciting record. It makes us tempted to put money on the Mercury already.

Overall ‘Lungs’ is best described as transcending. It blends its creators influences of everything from classic pop (Kate Bush is often cited as a predecessor) to gospel music, and if the closing ‘bonus’ track (a cover of ‘You’ve Got The Love’) is to be believed, dance music. Forthcoming single ‘Rabbit Heart (Raise It Up)’, with it’s gentle yet striking harp parts sounds exotic whereas the already ubiquitous ‘Kiss With A Fist’ is a rocky blues number like Jack White used to write before he started messing around with bagpipes. There’s many touchstones here (fans of Guillemots ‘Through The Windowpane’ will probably enjoy this for it’s orchestral splendour) but overall there’s nothing that this album sounds exactly like, as is its beauty.

Overall it’s hard to pick out highlights from this album as it works so well as a whole. At the same time it’s not impenetrable and there’s plenty that could and has worked as a single. ‘Dog Days Are Over’ is a fantastic example of this. It opens the record, yet as a stand-alone single is a triumph in itself. ‘My Boy Builds Coffins’ due to it’s subject matter should come off as some deliberate attempt at quirky, but as it’s delivered with such gusto it’s captivating. This brings us to our favourite song here, ‘Howl’. Only four seconds over what is traditionally considered to be the perfect length of a pop song it’s stunning in its depth and builds spectacularly to a euphoric climax.

Not helped by the fact that the album is called ‘Lungs’, more has been made of Florence Welch’s voice than any other aspect of the music. And yes, her voice is stunning but if this were to be the only attraction to the music then this would not be the record that it is. Her cast of supporting musicians, The Machine that is, all pull more than the weight of mere session players. A solo artist Florence may be, but there’s some great musicianship on display here and it more than compliments the delicate, yet powerful arrangements.

‘Lungs’ isn’t a record for everyone, it needs to be said. Those who favour a more stripped down, or ‘lo-fi’ approach will more than likely baulk at the shiny epic-ness of this. It’s understandable, but this is their loss. We’re sure that Florence and the Machine will live up to the expectations thrust upon them, and with this only being the debut album there’s still time for Ms Welch to get even better”.

There are a couple more reviews worth bringing in. The BBC had their say on a magnificent album. Even though Lungs missed out on a Mercury Prize in 2009 - Speech Debelle’s Speech Therapy won that year -, the critical acclaim and success it acquired – reaching number one on the U.K. album chart – means that it was this ground-shaking debut from the group. Led by the phenomenon that is Florence Welch, Lungs still has plenty of life and wonder fifteen years later:

Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock since the beginning of the year, you’ll be aware of Florence and the Machine. Before even releasing an album, the first lady and her revolving band have been championed by BBC Introducing, invited to play Glastonbury and support Blur at Hyde Park, and won the Critic's Choice Award at this year’s BRITs. Now they're being tipped for Mercury Prize glory. How can an album possibly live up to the pressure of all that expectation? I don't quite know… but it does by the gallon.

Florence Welch's distinctive voice intertwines beautifully with harps, strings and drums as she sings her inimitable 'soul inspired indie' and 'Tim Burton-style fairytales'. The gothic pop of Lungs has been excellently produced by a crack team - Paul Epworth (Bloc Party, Jack Penate, Maximo Park), James Ford (Arctic Monkeys, Klaxons, Last Shadow Puppets) and Steve Mackey (Pulp, M.I.A.).

There's so much brilliant stuff it's difficult to know where to begin. The soaring crescendo of new single Rabbit Heart (Raise It Up), the achingly beautiful Howl and a breathtaking cover of The Source classic You Got The Love. Drumming is a fabulous nail-on-the-head song about what it feels like to be in love.

There are touches of Mama Cass on happy clappy debut single Dogs Days Are Over and at the other end of the energy scale, the twinkly loveliness of Hurricane Drunk. The low points are few – perhaps that I'm Not Calling You A Liar falls a bit flat between choruses, and the lyrics to Girl With One Eye are closer to disturbing than kooky. But mostly it's sheer gleeful bliss listening to Lungs.

Florence says music is, ''at best a kind of magic that lifts you up and takes you somewhere else''. With vocals building from breathy almost-nothings to soaring, arching crescendos and the accompanying harps, strings, hopes and dreams, this album takes you somewhere you'll never want to come back from. When news gets out that she writes her best stuff, ''when drunk or hungover'', Florence's transition from unknown to British classic will be complete”.

The final review I want to spotlight is from SLANT. They were full of praise for a debut album from a group like nothing on the scene in 2009. I remember when Lungs came out. I was blown away by it. I was familiar with Florence + The Machine, though I was not quite prepared for the scope and power of Lungs:

Amid the ecstasies of praise for her songwriting, one of the less generous comments made this year about Florence Welch, frontwoman of Florence and the Machine, was journalist Miranda Sawyer’s description of her as “big-boned.” It was a surprisingly revealing inaccuracy. Although in fact physically slight, Florence—with her pre-Raphaelite tumble of russet hair and strong jaw—is a dramatic beauty given an illusory voluptuousness by the gossamer folds of her stage costumes. She has a powerful voice (a chorister’s range perverted by gothic cadences) and a feverish stage presence, dangling from lighting rigs and intermittently launching herself into the audience at her shows. She might be svelte, but in her music Florence certainly gives a full-bodied performance.

The opening number of the band’s Lungs, “Dog Days Are Over,” begins yearningly: Harp strings gently buffet Florence’s fluttery vocals as she describes how “happiness hit her like a train on a track/Coming towards her, stuck still, no turning back” before a swell of drum beats and handclaps lift the song to its exultant chorus. Florence urgently proclaims, “Leave all your love and your longing behind/You can’t carry it with you if you want to survive,” and for an exquisite moment it feels as though any heartbreak could be so easily surmounted. Inevitably, the momentum of the album slows after the impassioned rush of such an opener, but it remains a compellingly eccentric work. “Rabbit Heart (Raise It Up),” for instance, is a swirling coloratura about ritual sacrifice, and when Florence, her voice somewhere between terror and junked-up rapture, sings, “This is a gift, it comes with a price/Who is the lamb and who is the knife?,” she gives the scenario a frightening beauty.

Despite the album’s morbid overtones (“Girl with One Eye” reaches a new extreme in schoolgirl viciousness) Florence and the Machine is a less somber outfit than Bat for Lashes, with whom Florence is frequently compared. If Bat’s Natasha Khan prefers to go on a spooky midnight ramble to decide a boyfriend’s fate, Florence is more apt to sock him one: “Kiss with a Fist” is a wildly impolitic ditty about mutual domestic violence (“A kick in the teeth is good for some/A kiss with a fist is better than none”). It doesn’t quite work. Although there’s something slightly churlish in unfavorably comparing a finished song with its demo, “Kiss” worked considerably better in draft form, the roughness which made it seem like gutsy slapstick, rather than simple provocation, somewhat lost in the finessed album version.

Florence’s music is particularly sensitive to studio gloss; her singing is a fine balance between elegance and frenzy. Indeed, with a voice that is both soaring and ragged, Florence is perhaps offering tribute to her respiratory system in the album’s title. But if her lungs let her hold those high notes (or even better, as on “Between Two Lungs,” enable a first intimate moment between two lovers), Florence’s body also rankles in its ability to betray her feelings.

On the fittingly titled “Drumming Song,” Florence’s pounding head and heart in the presence of an ex reaches an audible volume, the dissonance amplifying until it becomes her puppeteer: “I swallow the sound and it swallows me whole.” While she can command her swooping vocals, her body rebels, wracked by fear, grief, and desire. She is made bestial by a relationship’s decay in “Howl,” her transformation a lycanthropic fantasy possibly too overtly sensual and bloodthirsty to find favor with Stephenie Meyer devotees, not least when she promises to “drag my teeth across your chest to taste your beating heart.” Only when she gets utterly soused on “Hurricane Drunk” does the free-fall from control seem pleasurable. Catching sight of her lover with another girl, she’s now sufficiently unmoored from her feelings to be wry about her heartache: “I brace myself, ‘cause I know it’s gonna hurt/But I like to think at least things can’t get any worse.”

Appropriately for a collection of songs where uncontrollable emotion develops into a kind of dyspraxia, the album stumbles in places. However earnest the attempt, Candi Staton’s “You Got the Love” surely doesn’t need any more reinterpretations, even if Florence cutely reintroduces good grammar into the title by changing “You” to “You’ve.” As that small gesture implies, Florence is still punctilious even when life beats her down; when it raises her up, she is magical”.

 On 3rd July, the immense Lungs turns fifteen. I hope that more people write about it. Certified six-times platinum, it was a remarkable success. Introducing the world to this exceptional group, Lungs was much more than its six singles. It is a complete and compelling album where every track hits. If you have not heard Lungs for a while, then go and do so now. It is a pleasure writing about it ahead of…

ITS fifteenth anniversary.

FEATURE: Groovelines: London Grammar – Wasting My Young Years

FEATURE:

 

 

Groovelines

 

London Grammar – Wasting My Young Years

_________

I am thinking about London Grammar…

as their third studio album, The Greatest Love, is out soon. It comes eleven years after their remarkable debut album, If You Wait (2013). You can order The Greatest Love here or here. We have to wait until 13th September to get that album. A lot has changed in the past few years for Hannah Reid, Dan Rothman and Dominic ‘Dot’ Major. Reid has become a mother. The group’s inspirations have changed and expanded. I wonder how Hannah Reid feels about the trio’s greatest song – in my mind anyway. A song that deals with maybe some misspent youth and regrets, she is now a bit older and wiser. A new addition to her family. Their second single, Wasting My Young Years, followed Metal & Dust. Released in June 2013, Wasting My Young Years peaked at thirty-one in the U.K. It is an impressive chart position, though it was worthy of so much more. That debut album, If You Wait, was acclaimed. I don’t think that we had really heard anything quite like London Grammar. I am surprised that the album was not shortlisted for a Mercury Prize in 2014 - as it could have been in with a shot of winning. The songwriting throughout is incredible. Even though each of the trio has their strengths, it is depth and power of Hannah’s Reid’s vocals that really make every song go deep. Her lyrics too. On that 2013 debut, we get such maturity and impact from her words. Her stunning vocal range is something to behold! Perhaps the finest and purest distillation of her vocal wonder is on Wasting My Young Years. I think more people should talk about this song. As London Grammar have a new album coming along, I wanted to go back over eleven years to a very important time. A single that got a lot of praise. I am going to bring in a couple of reviews.

I would love for there more to be out there about Wasting My Young Years. Such is the potency of the song. How affecting it is. Testament to Hannah Reid’s songwriting – Wasting My Young Years, Interlude (live) and If You Wait are the other solo-written tracks on If You Wait -, I would love to see London Grammar live to see how this song sounds now. They have performed it live this year. The relationship with the track has shifted. The trio have grown and changed. Across the Ocean had their say on the song back in 2014:

Cinematic in scope, ‘Wasting My Young Years’ serves a worthy successor to their breakthrough smash hit ‘Strong’ – a track now boasting in excess of 7 million views on YouTube.

Since receiving its first play on Zane Lowe’s Radio 1 show, ‘Wasting My Young Years’ has garnered strong support at UK radio not to mention more than 8 million plays online.

The track is taken from London Grammar’s #2 ARIA Chart debut album If You Wait – a release that saw the band awarded iTunes UK Album Of The Year and nominated for Best Breakthrough Artist at this year’s Brit Awards, as well as most recently taking home the converted Best Song Musically and Lyrically award for ‘Strong‘ at the Ivor Novello awards.

Their first trip to Australian shores culminated in a host of rave reviews from three SOLD OUT headline shows, whilst in the country for The Falls & Southbound Festivals; landing not one, but three coveted spots in triple j’s inaugural Hottest 100, including a Top 10 placing with ‘Strong’”.

I am going to wrap up soon. I remember when Wasting My Young Years came out. I was thirty at the time. It was quite an eye-opening song. I could relate to many of the lyrics. Hannah Reid was only twenty-two when the song was released. There is this mantra-like quality to the lyrics. Certain lines and phrases reiterated and repeated. My favourite section is: “Don't you know that it's only fear/I wouldn't worry, you have all your life/I've heard it takes some time to get it right/I'm wasting my young years/It doesn't matter if/I'm chasing old ideas/It doesn't matter…”. It can be interpreted as Hannah Reid being more general or oblique. You get the feeling that she is discussing maybe a slow start to a music career. Spending time not perusing her dreams or making some errors when it came to priorities. In September 2013, The Guardian interviewed London Grammar. There was a bit of context and explanation around Wasting My Young Years:

The band met while at Nottingham University, where Reid and guitarist Dan Rothman drafted in Dot Major from the year below to add percussion (at their first gig as a three-piece, this involved him playing the djembe) to their sound. After just a handful of shows, they were signed to Ministry. The label, best known for its rave compilations, seems an unlikely fit but, says Reid, "the fact they were independent gave us a chance to go away, work on the songs and wait until we were ready."

The song that got them noticed – Wasting My Young Years – is a chilling look at the despondency of youth. Reid says it was written after a breakup and is about the pain of investing time in someone who squanders it. But at a time when young people feel entirely at sea – unable to find work or afford rents, forced back into their childhood homes – the song takes on a generational eeriness.

"I have a lot of friends now who are really lost," says Reid. "We got to go to university and have a good education, but we're finding ourselves in a position where it's impossible to get jobs, and we're terrified. So many people I know don't know what to do with their lives."

Though written mostly from experiences in Reid's personal life, If You Wait speaks to inauspicious beginnings of adulthood. It is often said that there are no angry young bands any more, but demoralisation rarely manifests itself in rage. In your 20s, anger gets taken out on your relationships and your self-esteem. This is a record that whispers with the pain of "a life that is cold" and being left "to the wayside, like you do". Perhaps it is the first quarter-life-crisis album.

For a group of middle-class kids such as these, finishing university and trying to make it as a pop band is a risky endeavour that almost always ends in failure and puts you years behind your peers. But the irony is, that London Grammar are neither the middle-of-the-road group they appear to be nor in the precarious state of youth they describe.

When most university graduates are staring into the unknown, being in this band might just have been the smartest move these three young people could have made. This is not just a record that speaks to mid-20s despondency, it offers a way out of it”.

I want to bring in a final review/feature about Wasting My Young Years. A song that still sounds utterly beautiful and affecting. Such an amazingly realised and confident song from a new group. Proof that Hannah Reid is among the most distinct voices – lyrical and vocal – of her generation. This is what CLASH said of Wasting My Young Years in May 2013:

Youth is such a precious commodity.

Fragile, compact, limited to such a short time frame, youth has all the splendour, innocence and promise you care to mention.

Which is what makes London Grammar such an odd proposition. Formed at university, the band are still fresh out of their teens yet have become one of the most heavily dropped names in the music industry.

And their new single? 'Wasting My Young Years'. A beautifully executed piece of heartbroken pop music, this is languid, melancholic, anthemic in a way Lana Dey Rey can only dream of.

Yet for some reason, London Grammar still believe that they're wasting their young years… Strange”.

A song I was keen to explore for Groovelines, the atmospheric, epic and gorgeous Wasting My Young Years is, in my view, still the best thing London Grammar have recorded. Ahead of the release of the release of The Greatest Love – which one feels will include meditations on motherhood and fulfilment -, it is worth looking back at where it started. Hannah Reid pouring out her heart and veins in a moving song. There is still nothing out there…

QUITE like Wasting My Young Years.

FEATURE: Spotlight: Arooj Aftab

FEATURE:

 

 

Spotlight

PHOTO CREDIT: Kate Sterlin

 

Arooj Aftab

_________

AN album released recently that I hope…

more people pick up and listen to, Night Reign by Arooj Aftab is gorgeous. The Pakistani-American composer, artist and producer is someone who should be on your radar. This GRAMMY-winning artist is someone who everyone needs to hear. On the seventy-fifth diamond jubilee anniversary of Pakistan, President Arif Alvi awarded Aftab the Pride of Performance Award. This is Pakistan's most prestigious award for excellence in the field of art and music. I am going to end with a review for Night Reign. Prior to that, so we can learn more about Arooj Aftab, I am going to combine some fairly recent interviews. There are quite a few interviews from this year from Arooj Aftab. That is great, as we get to discover multiple sides of her magnificent music and personality. I am going to quote from four of the interviews. Actually, thinking about it, I will include three interviews – as it will be quite a lot of information and words I am putting out. I would urge everyone to do more digging and reading to discover as much as you can concerning Arooj Aftab. Anyway, let’s start out with Rolling Stone and their recent interview with this amazing and multi-talented artist:

ARE DOING stuff that is indicative of fun,” Arooj Aftab says, quite seriously, in the flat staccato cadence of a test proctor.

The Pakistani-born, Berklee-trained, Brooklyn-based musician is talking about the singing on her new album, Night Reign, out May 31: the doubled vocals, the fresh harmonies, and especially the Auto-Tune that envelops her voice on lead single “Raat Ki Rani” and lends it that spectral pop aura. Aftab remembers asking the mix engineer, “Can you please put, like, T-Pain amounts of Auto-Tune on this and let’s see how it sounds?”

Vulture Prince propelled Aftab from professional-artist-with-a-day-job to Grammy-winner — she was the first ever Pakistani artist to win one — with prominent placement on Barack Obama’s summer playlist. Her team grew with her stature; she signed to Verve, and spent the next few years touring the world in support of both Vulture Prince and her 2023 collaboration with Vijay Iyer and Shahzad Ismaily, Love in Exile. In the midst of all this came the inevitable rumblings from everyone around her: “Oh my god, the follow-up!”

PHOTO CREDIT: Quyn Duong

“I was really worried about this being the Vulture Prince follow-up, and it needing to be better, or at least the same… or at least it really needs to not suck,” Aftab says with a laugh. “You know, when you have a record that people really love, you’re kind of fucked, because the next one has to be equally good or better. And that’s really scary. My mind was preoccupied with how to take the sound further.”

She continues: “When you blow up, your cute art becomes a small business. You’re not just writing about your feelings anymore. It means a lot more, the stakes are higher. The artist employs pretty much everybody from the managers to the bookers — you’re responsible to then continue to create something good. I wanted to escape it, but then I just got real with it.”

Aftab originally planned to make an album centered around the poetry of Mah Laqa Bai Chanda, an 18th/19th-century courtesan, political advisor, and warrior, who was also the first female Urdu poet to publish a collection of her own work. No one had set her poems to music before, and Aftab was up for the challenge, until it began to feel more like a creative imposition than a stimulating prompt. So she ditched the larger concept, kept what made sense (Chanda’s poems form the basis of two songs, “Na Gul” and “Saaqi”), and opened herself up to everything.

Night Reign includes interpolations of the jazz standard “Autumn Leaves” and Shamim Jaipuri’s ghazal “Zameen,” made famous by the great Indian singer Begum Akhtar. (“She’s like my Billie Holiday, so I gotta have my girl in there,” Aftab says.) Opener “Aey Nehin” is based on an impromptu poem Aftab saw her friend, the Pakistani actress Yasra Rizvi, recite on Instagram. “There’s a looseness, a fun, and a non-seriousness about it that actually ends up being very beautiful — it’s not contrived at all,” Aftab says. “It’s one of my favorite songs on the record.”

PHOTO CREDIT: Quyn Duong

Aftab is maybe most animated when discussing the thrills and sonic possibilities that come from putting different musicians, with different skill sets and personalities, into a room together — something she came to embrace as a major part of overcoming the pressures of following up Vulture Prince. “People are not going to say ‘No’ if you pick up the phone and call,” she says. “You can expand your sound, you have the access.”

Embracing this kind of confidence in community makes total sense for an extrovert like Aftab. “I love hanging out, meeting new people, and that fuels my creativity,” she says. And there’s no time better for all of that than the night — especially if you’re a musician on tour. “The touring nightlife, even though it’s so chaotic, so hectic, so full of people, I feel there’s a stillness in all of that,” she adds. “I can be alone with my thoughts, I can write, I can be creative somehow. Less than when I’m just back in Brooklyn doing interviews and going to the dentist.”

Three years of intense touring behind Vulture Prince and Love in Exile has changed that a bit. After performing, Aftab now heads straight for the hotel, not because she’s ready to conk out — she’s likely still “so juiced” from the show — but because she knows herself so well: “No one get in my way with a beer, don’t even look at me, because then I’ll hang out and suddenly it’ll be four in the morning, and the next day is gonna suck”.

I am going to move on to a fantastic interview from The Quietus. They salute and spend time with the peerless New York musician. You do not need to know about Arooj Aftab to appreciate her album, Night Reign. It is one of the most immersive and nuanced albums of this year. You will come back and discover new layers and highlights:

The thing she wanted it to do was bridge the gap between the traditional (influences of Pakistani classical, jazz and minimalism sung predominantly in Urdu verse) and the contemporary. When the record was released, Aftab told the Los Angeles Times that she hoped Vulture Prince would “transcend boundaries.” In doing so, her innovation also garnered her new fans and accolades. She became the first-ever Pakistani woman to win a Grammy Award for her song ‘Mohabbat’ (meaning ‘love’) in 2022, a yearning ballad inspired by a well-known ghazal (an ancient form of Arabic poetry) penned by Hafeez Hoshiarpuri. Barack Obama even selected the dew-dappled song as one of his summer playlist favourites in 2021.

All this was, it’s fair to say, “a huge surprise” for a musician who taught herself the guitar as a teenager in Lahore, Pakistan, listening to Billie Holiday and “the Queen of Ghazals” Begum Akhtar. No longer bound to a corporate nine-to-five, she could finally be the musician she wanted to be: a critically-acclaimed artist in New York – the city she’s called home for well over a decade. “When your project becomes successful, people start gravitating towards you in a particular way, and I was experiencing this in the evenings at parties,” she says. Which is how the darkness of night came to be her muse on this new record. Not simply a period of time, she emphasises, but a protagonist in its own right, personified through vignettes and melody. “Once I honed in on that, it just took off.”

When talking about boundaries with Aftab, it’s impossible not to acknowledge the geographical ones, too. “I was born in Saudi Arabia and it has felt strange for the longest time,” she says as we discuss movement and heritage. Aftab was born to Pakistani parents in what she describes as “a closed place, a desert, the pinnacle of reserved religion” and the strangeness she feels is partly to do with this expatriated disconnection. Growing up there, its barrenness didn’t match up with the fertility of home which was guided by parents she describes as “seventies liberals”. Bearing this in mind, her move to Lahore in Pakistan, when she was eleven years old, changed everything. It’s a tangible place, she tells me. “I’m really glad that my parents decided to leave and go to their home country. There was a lot of celebration of language and culture. It’s woven into the fabric there – art, music, poetry, dance – and I fell in love with all these things.”

Although often described as a genre-defying artist, many like to genre-define her on a micro level anyway. From “jazz fusion” and “Hindustani classical” to “neo-Sufism” – a term Aftab herself came up with in her younger years when asked what her first record was all about. Does she regret coining it, I wonder? She laughs. “I was just a baby, you know? I should’ve been like, it’s new! I’m making something that I want to hear that I’m not finding in the music scene.” When it came to an east-to-west crossover in 2014 nothing she was listening to quite hit the mark. “Yeah, someone can play tablas and put a saxophone over it but that’s not contemporary. You’re just putting blocks together. Where’s the next step?” One gets the sense that this is a question Aftab has asked herself from the very beginning. In 2014, the then-29-year-old released her soulful debut, Bird Under Water, blending trumpets, accordion, sitar and bansuri (an ancient side-blown bamboo flute originating from India and Nepal) with qawwali, a form of Sufi Islamic devotional singing, to mesmerising effect. Three years later, she fearlessly mutated with her follow-up Siren Islands, an aqueous underworld of synthesised sound, ghostly and chimerical, that took us to the three rocky islands where the sirens of Greek mythology lured sailors to their deaths.

And then came Vulture Prince in 2021, a record that metamorphosed of its own accord, reshaped and reformed by the eddy and flow of her grief. The record is dedicated to the memory of her younger brother, Maher, who died while she was making it. Lost voices, and lost moments. In the accompanying promotional material for Night Reign there is talk of “stepping away from, though never forgetting, the grief and loss that animated” the last record. I wonder how her grief has evolved as she embraces this new iteration of blossoming songs – something she calls an “unfurling”. There is a dynamism to Night Reign that feels like she’s treading new ground. And yet I get the sense that there is a continuation of remembrance, too. “It’s come together as grief does, right?” she replies. “I was really sad when I was writing Vulture Prince. In the last couple of years, that sadness has been embraced and has evolved. And I feel joy, I feel the sultriness, I feel the celebration of life. I don’t want to be associated with sad lament-y stuff just because the last record was that. Night Reign is almost fun. It’s an honest representation of where I’m at.”

With the American poet, musician, and activist Moor Mother, however, comes a different kind of sentiment – and one that also helps define Night Reign. “We’ve been waiting for this moment, and the right song,” Aftab tells me when I ask her about their pairing on ‘Bolo Na’: an elemental call with burning lyrics that seem to nudge us into darker waters. “I want to believe in a love, in a future, I want to believe,” Moor Mother repeats over a skulking bassline. It’s a line that feels pertinent to where we find ourselves in 2024. On the morning that I meet Aftab, Donald Trump’s trial is reconvening in Manhattan, and abortion rights advocates and opponents are clashing outside the US Supreme Court. A lot has happened globally since Aftab’s last record came out in the midst of the pandemic – and the anger isn’t lost in this follow-up. ‘Bolo Na’ began as a love song, she tells me, written when she was a teenager about a non-committal entanglement. “Like, do you love me or not?” Aftab summarises. Deemed “too corny” by the young singer, it was soon shelved – until the bassline returned to her recently and she realised it signalled to something far greater. “This is a resistance song now,” she says. “It’s no longer a love story.” When she sent the track to Moor Mother she said, “We can be mad, we can be upset about stuff.” And Moor Mother delivered. “This insanely hard shit,” she laughs.  “Moor Mother is crazy, she’s so good.” What began as a “lame” ballad full of questions transformed into a powerful awakening. “I don’t need to know if you love me or not,” she circles back to her teen-lyric. “I know you’re lying.” In this sense, the toxic relationship is no longer with a former love interest but with the current structures that claim to hold us. “The world is lying to us,” she says with an impassioned voice, “they don’t love us.” When she put down her vocals there was, she says, a righteous feeling – almost of happiness. “Because this mopey love song turned into my feeling of right now. This is how we feel right now. We feel like establishments that were put in place to protect us aren’t doing that. And we’re stuck.”

It’s a sentiment that is reflected in her cover of the old jazz standard ‘Autumn Leaves’ based on the French song ‘Les Feuilles Mortes’ (‘The Dead Leaves’). When it was written in 1945, its composer, the Hungarian Joseph Kosma, was under house arrest in occupied France. “The falling leaves drift by my window,” Aftab sings on a cavernous rendition that teeters on the edge of something. It is, she agrees, another kind of resistance song: “Jazz is a deeply resistant music and it’s been a part of my world forever.” As has her love of singing in Urdu, another lifeline that runs through her records. A question she always asks herself is how she can tell a story through music while also minimising the lyrics so that we can “just feel.” I wonder if there is a kind of freedom for non-Urdu-speaking listeners like myself with only her music as my guide. On a midsummer’s evening in 2022, I watched thousands of people coalesce in enthralled rapture as Aftab sang against the majestic silhouette of the Welsh Brecon Beacons. It’s a stillness that could have rivalled a great cathedral. And yet, for many, the lyrics were a mystery to them – absorbed, as if by osmosis”.

Prior to coming to a review for Neigh Reign, this SPIN interview is worth bringing in. They note how Arooj Aftab keeps charting new musical territory. In doing so, she is providing a compass to the listener. She could have copied Vulture Prince or done something similar. Instead, her latest album is a new direction and fresh piece of work. Something that pushes her work to the next level:

SPIN: You’ve pushed back on being considered a “world music” artist and you won the Best Global Music Performance Grammy. How do you feel about that?

Arooj Aftab: There are a lot of (Grammy) categories, and they’re there to have your peers vote, and the people who know the particular genre the best decide which should win. There’s a legitimate strategy behind the way it’s laid out. Music is just not that simple in that way.

World music is considered something that is very rooted in tradition, and it is less contemporary, less modern, and more classical. And I’m not. Just because I’m brown and it’s in a different language doesn’t mean it’s qawwalis like Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.

Because of Vulture Prince’s success, did you feel extra pressure when you were working on Night Reign?

Vulture Prince was something that I was chasing. Not everybody listens to music in such compartmentalized ways. The world has become cross-cultural and not segregated in the way that it used to be. And so where is the music that shows that? There’s been a gap in the music conversation and in the actual music.

I had been thinking about that, conceptualizing it, and trying to execute it. But Vulture Prince was a big breakthrough. That was the goal of my life up until then. And it set me free. Now that I’ve had three years of talking to the press and training them in this new form of music, I’m free to expand on it. It’s just fun. And so the pressure of the follow-up album being good or not isn’t so relevant.

What inspires you about the nighttime?

We know already as a universal fact that musicians love the night. The night is our friend. For me, there is a night or two where things come together and creativity blossoms. The night provides this canopy where you don’t have to be so direct. You can gracefully move from one place to another, from person to person. It’s not so exposed. That’s so beautiful. Also, as a woman in any fucking place, at night we’re scared. The night is not just all fun or healing. It’s a scary place where things are not that visible. Once I landed on the album theme being not about me or someone else who I have feelings towards – like, Vulture Prince was about my brother and my friend who passed away. As soon as it became clear that it should be the night, it set me free. 

On “Raat Ki Rani,” you use AutoTune. I saw someone on Twitter dug up some old tweets where you were talking shit about AutoTune.

When AutoTune came out, it was introduced to the music industry as a corrective device. And so of course, as a 23-year-old vocalist, I was like, “Fuck AutoTune!” But since then it’s evolved so much with artists like James Blake and Imogen Heap and Cher and T-Pain and Snoop and Kanye and Kid Cudi. They have innovated how vocals can be presented while still remaining soulful and non-destructive of the actual essence of the voice.

There was a feeling on Night Reign about not being so formal or sad or precious, and I think “Raat Ki Rani” is really playful. It’s sultry and inviting. And when I put AutoTune on that, it fit the mood of the song and nudged audiences into feeling a little lighthearted.

Tessa Thompson directed the “Raat Ki Rani” video. You also worked with her dad [Chocolate Genius] on the album. How did you connect?

I’ve been a fan of her work for a really long time. And then we became friends over the course of the last few years. Tessa was in London, and I had a show, and she came to that, and we hung out after. We realized that we really like each other, and there’s a genuineness that is rare in our industries. I had thought of her while I was writing the album. I was like, “Hey, I think you should be in the music video because you’ve been a muse for some of this music,” and then it was her idea to direct it instead. That’s an honor.

I think because your music is “serious music,” people think of you as a very serious person. People think artists are exactly like what their music sounds like.

I’m still conditioning people to move away from their surface level prejudice of what they think this is and who they think the followers are and the collaborators are. So many responses were like, “Wow, what a crossover! Penn Badgley likes Arooj Aftab’s music?” Welcome to the new world. Where people are not boxing everybody in in this way, and these crossovers are very natural and very New York, and this is just what the music does to people.

From Penn to Tessa to Obama to Elvis Costello, people are gravitating towards this music. Even in the way that I choose who to invite to collaborate with me, these are subtle ways in which I’m teaching everybody to chill out and be cool and just let music take you where it needs to go and not worry about my ethnicity or your own ethnicity. And that’s something to celebrate.

Does it feel different singing in different languages? You use English more on an everyday basis, but the majority of your music is in Urdu.

I’m pretty purely bilingual. But I like Urdu because it is a minimalist language in the way that I use it, where it’s phrases and sentences that are more metaphoric. The name of the flower is not jasmine, it’s “queen of the night.” The Urdu language is not so wordy, because the words already have so much meaning.

One phrase that you’ve used to describe your music is “hopeful disdain.” What does that mean to you?

The state of the world is awful and upsetting, and there’s a lot of melancholy there, but it’s also beautiful. The emphasis is that there’s still hope. There are these glimmers of sunshine in all the music. The world-building never gets really dark. It’s always still hopeful while acknowledging how fucked up things are”.

It is almost time to get to one of the many positive reviews for Night Reign. Surely among the very best albums of this year, I do genuinely think that it will enrich everyone’s life. You need to hear it! On 9th July, Arooj Aftab plays OMEARA in London. I would urge people to get a ticket if they can. An artist who really needs to be seen in the flesh.

I will finish with a review from Pitchfork. It is brilliant seeing all the wonderful reviews for an essential and powerful work. Arooj Aftab is a truly exceptional artist and composer. She should be known by the world. I can see her releasing many more albums in the future. She seems to grow stronger with each release. That is why I want to highlight her here:

It isn’t easy to say something new with “Autumn Leaves.” The 1945 torch song is surely one of the most performed standards in the jazz repertoire, not only by the likes of Miles Davis and Nat King Cole, but also by the beginners taking lessons in the back rooms of your local store music store: sitting down at a piano to play its wistful minor-key melody is a bit like the jazz version of picking up an electric guitar and going straight for “Smoke on the Water.” Putting your rendition on a new album in 2024 is either a conservative move or a bold one. For Arooj Aftab, the Brooklyn-via-Lahore singer and composer who moves freely between jazz, folk, and Hindustani and Western classical music, it is decidedly the latter.

Aftab’s “Autumn Leaves” comes early on Night Reign, her fourth solo album, and renders it as a ghostly incantation. Metallic percussion clatters in the background. Linda May Han Oh’s upright bass lines follow Aftab’s vocal like an elongated shadow follows the protagonist of a noir film. Without a chordal instrument to support it, the familiar tune becomes skeletal and spooky; Aftab’s chromatic embellishments make it spookier. Her take on “Autumn Leaves” is emblematic of the way she works: drawing from tradition while at the same time estranging it, stripping away clichés and stock devices to reveal the mysterious longing that gives the old poems and songs their lasting power.

Two of Night Reign’s songs take their words from Mah Laqa Bai Chanda, the 18th-century poet who was the first woman to publish a collection of work in Urdu. Other lyrics are Aftab originals, in both English and Urdu. Still another is based on an offhanded poem that the singer’s friend, the Pakistani actress Yasra Rizvi, posted to Instagram. Aftab unites her source material’s mix of the centuries-old and the ephemeral with her wondrous voice, sometimes soaring but just as potent in its husky lower register. And with her compositions, which patiently gather and dissolve, favoring long arcs of development over sudden dynamic shifts. Though Night Reign has plenty of distinct zones—grungy bass guitar takes the lead on “Bolo Na”; Auto-Tune drapes Aftab’s voice on “Raat Ki Kai”—as a whole it can have the feeling of a single sweeping piece of music.

Aftab, who produces her albums herself, deserves as much credit for her composing and arranging as she does for her singing. Night Reign’s palette is similar to Vulture Prince, her 2021 breakout album, and features many of the same players along with a few new ones: harpist Maeve Gilchrist, whose instrument is second only to Aftab’s singing as the signature sound of her music; Aftab’s Love in Exile bandmates, jazz piano star Vijay Iyer and multi-instrumentalist Shahzad Ismaily; guitarists Kaki King and Gyan Riley; flautist Cautious Clay; percussionist Jamey Haddad; an unlikely Wurlitzer cameo from Elvis Costello. Their instruments drift like a breeze of dandelion seeds, in the same general direction but with independent and unpredictable paths between one point and another. Even Moor Mother, whose stentorian spoken-word is one of the most distinctive sounds in left-of-center music, becomes just another element of the melange when she arrives to deliver a guest verse on “Bolo Na,” the percussive edges of her delivery swept up in the song’s half-time rhythmic churn.

Though actual percussion remains sparse, Night Reign grooves harder than its predecessor, which featured almost no drums. Even when the rhythm instruments sit back, there’s almost always a sense of an insistent pulse, an effect that’s especially pronounced on opener “Aey Nehin”: an acoustic guitar carries it, then a harp, then some hand percussion—all sharing the responsibility for keeping up momentum, tossing it back and forth, and dancing a little more freely when it’s someone else’s turn to hold it down. (Whether or not he’s a direct influence on Aftab, Gyan Riley’s father Terry, the master minimalist composer, sometimes comes to mind in moments like these.) On “Last Night Reprise,” a setting of an English translation of a poem by Rumi, Petros Klampanis’ bass is the lone pace-keeper, pressing on with a simple ostinato as the rest of the players wander into clamorous free improv during the instrumental middle section. They cohere again behind Aftab when she returns to the mic for the thrilling finale. “Last night my beloved was like the moon,” she sings, alternating between heroic long tones and frantic rushes of syllables. “So beautiful like the moon.”

Vulture Prince, which Aftab recorded in the aftermath of her younger brother’s death, is an album haunted by grief. Night Reign is less tethered to a single theme: Aftab originally conceived it as a collection of settings of Mah Laqa Bai Chanda’s work, then abandoned the idea when it began to feel constrictive. But if there’s one situation or emotion that persists across its songs—even “Autumn Leaves”—it is loving someone who isn’t there. It’s in the words, whether adapted from 18th-century poetry or an Instagram post, and in the mixture of tenderness and tough resolve that characterizes Aftab’s singing. It’s also in the music itself, in the vaporous way the instruments hover around some unspoken center, drawing as much attention to the negative space as the sound, and in the pulse that seems to keep going even when you can’t actually hear it. Almost anyone can relate to the feeling Night Reign renders in sound: the object of your affection may be gone, but the memories and desire that linger on are just as real”.

Such a sensational and sublime composer, producer and artist, the New York-based Pakistani genius is a fairly new discovery to me. Arooj Aftab’s Night Reign is an album that will stay with you long after you have heard it. I have passed through it a few times. If you are not familiar with Arooj Aftab than make sure that you acquaint yourself with her work. She is an artist that truly…

HAS to be heard.

_________

Follow Arooj Aftab

FEATURE: From a Landline in England… Revisiting the Joy of Kate Bush’s Woman’s Hour Interview

FEATURE:

 

 

From a Landline in England…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1985/PHOTO CREDIT: Dave Hogan/Getty Images 

 

Revisiting the Joy of Kate Bush’s Woman’s Hour Interview

_________

I have been looking back…

IN THIS PHOTO: Woman’s Hour’s Emma Barnett

at Kate Bush interviews from through the years. I have been listening to a lot to interviews she gave to promote 2011’s 50 Words for Snow. There has not been a lot since then. The odd bit here and there. Whilst we have read updates from Kate Bush on her official website, we have not heard her voice a lot. In terms of interviews, there was a 2016 chat she had with Matt Everitt for BBC Radio 6 Music. That was when she discussed the live album of 2014’s Before the Dawn. We did not really know what would come after that. I am reminded now of a bombshell that happened on 22nd June, 2022. Just over two years ago, we were treated to hearing from Kate Bush once more. There was really no warning! I guess it is not a shock that she would have something to say about the success of Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God). Used on the Netflix series, Stranger Things, it went to number one in the U.K. Introducing Bush to a new generation of fans. Because of the new success, we heard Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) played widely across radio. It is her most-streamed song. Perhaps the song that people associate with her. That defining moment. Given how there was very little audio from Kate Bush after 2016, we sort of assumed that, if she had anything to add to her website updates, she would do that in writing. We might get a printed interview with her. That would have bene a gift. Instead, and without much warning, there was this spoken interview. We take music interviews for granted. Artists do this all of the time. You get YouTube and Spotify interviews. Plenty of radio interviews. More than enough chance to hear an artist discuss their music. When you think about Kate Bush, there has been this real absence of interviews for about a decade or so. Of course, her voice has not changed that much. She is still the same warm and down to Earth human. Even though we might never get another filmed interview, just hearing her voice was a tantalising thought.

As we have just past the two-year anniversary of this huge moment, I wanted to spend some time with it. The interview was conducted by Emma Barnett for Woman’s Hour. I will drop in the interview below. You can also listen here. There was so much to unpack and enjoy. For a start, it was that suddenness. No real tease or huge build-up. We saw an announcement shortly before broadcast that Kate Bush would be talking with Woman’s Hour. Despite the fact there was no new album or anything like that, it was a joy imagining Kate Bush speaking at all! Few fans thought we would hear unless there was a new album. June 2022 was also during the pandemic. Still quite a tough time for us all. There was something unifying and uplifting knowing we would hear from Kate Bush. The main reason for the interview was to talk about Stranger Things. Bush having this chance to thank fans. How Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) was this totemic moment in the episode. How it meant to much to Max. A song that saved a life. It resonated with fans. The genuine sense of pride and passion in Kate Bush’s voice as she thanked fans and the show’s creators! It was a smart choice speaking with Woman’s Hour. Rather than have a couple of minutes on another BBC station, this was a longer interview that was wonderful to hear. Genuine respect and love from Emma Barnett. I am not sure exactly where Kate Bush lives though, as it is her, there is that sense of the peaceful and English. A nice garden and home. Not that many mod cons I would imagine. Keeping things nice but fairly basic. One of the first things to note about the interview is that Kate Bush was speaking on a landline.

Almost obsolete, it is refreshing and typical that Kate Bush has a landline! She did explain how she had this old, brick-like mobile phone that she could make calls from. She did not want something modern because of the distracting nature. Checking emails on the go was not her style. Instead, she wanted to go outside and not have to feel at the mercy of a smartphone. Emma Barnett did not ask about a new album or material – a missed opportunity I feel -, though Kate Bush did say that she was spending a lot of time gardening. Many fans took this as a sign that she was retiring. As I pointed out when I discussed this interview in a previous feature, it is no shock that Bush enjoys gardening. It is not an activity solely for retired people. Bush grew up on East Wickham Farm and would have been gardening as a child and young woman. She gardened before making Hounds of Love. Something relaxing and an interest of her. Rather than it being a sign of slowing down, gardening is useful when it comes to creativity and rest. Caitlin Moran introduced the interview (there was this separate audio recording). She talked about Kate Bush. Bush talked about Stranger Things and how it was this great moment. Thinking that the whole world had gone mad because of the success of Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God), this whole new audience discovered her. I liked how Bush, when talking about the song, always felt that its title should be A Deal with God. She discussed how many of her songs had strange working titles. I would love to have known some of them! Bush said how she does not listen to her older music. Bush reiterated how her song was used in a very special place and was a powerful thing. Music has this way of touching people, as she said. Despite the fact Kate Bush was speaking on a landline, she said how today is a very exciting time because of the advances in technology. Emma Barnett praised how Bush was so far ahead of people she was in terms of studio technology. How Before the Dawn, her residency, was phone-free. Bush wanted there to be a strong connection between those in the audience and those on stage.

So much to enjoy and adore about the interview. Throughout, Kate Bush sounded engaged and warm. Bush said how she spent a lot of her day on the laptop. That need for peace when she goes out. Emma Barnett said how there is WitchTok, a subset of TikTok, inspired by Bush’s look in the video for Babooshka – to which Bush laughed and said it sounds ridiculous! Even if it was not a hugely long interview, it was a compassionate and very heartwarming moment that we were not expecting. Emma Barnett said at the end of the interview how Kate Bush can come back anytime. She did say that at the very end of the interview. It would be incredible if that were to happen! I guess there would need to be a new album or something big for us to hear her voice again. Even so, two years ago, we got this amazing moment we didn’t really think would happen. From somewhere in England, on a landline, the legendary Kate Bush spoke with Woman’s Hour. Social media was awash with people saying how happy they were hearing Kate Bush’s voice. As humble and relatable as she was back in the 1970s, it was refreshing knowing that not a lot had changed. It also means there is an appetite for something more. We all really want to hear from Kate Bush again. A reason for that to happen. Until that happens – if it does at all! – go and listen to that Woman’s Hour interview. Kate Bush sharing her thoughts on Stranger Things and how it helped bring Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) to the world. Getting this whole legion of new fans. I still think about the Woman’s Hour interview. Even though it was a fairly brief chat, it was this revelation and thing we never imagined. This treat for everyone. Hearing Kate Bush speak is almost therapeutic and calming. For that reason alone, we all hope that we can hear from Kate Bush…

VERY soon.

FEATURE: The Sony Walkman at Forty-Five: The Importance of the Original, and the Modern-Day Alternatives

FEATURE:

 

 

The Sony Walkman at Forty-Five

  

The Importance of the Original, and the Modern-Day Alternatives

_________

ON 1st July, 1979…

the world was introduced to a piece of music technology that would change the world. Released in Japan and eventually rolled out to the rest of the world, the Sony Walkman drastically altered how we would listen to music. In terms of portable devices, nothing before had come onto the market. It was a huge moment in the way in which we could listen to music on the move. One would think that, as it was released in 1979, the Sony Walkman would be hefty and heavy to carry around. That was not the case. Actually fairly lightweight and sleek, its design would be refined through the years. As it is forty-five today, I wanted to celebrate it, also looking at what is on the market today. It is an important anniversary. Forty-five years after the Sony Walkman came out, there is relevance discussing it. Cassettes are still around today. As I have said in previous features about the Sony Walkman: there are not really enough options to play them on. I am going to explore some buying options for those who want to play cassettes on the move. Can anything really compete with the simply iconic original Sony Walkman?! I think it is one of the most important moments in music history. Giving music fans that freedom and mobility. Even the transistor radio arrived well before the Sony Walkman and meant that people could listen to the radio portability, it did not really compare with the Sony Walkman. The privacy you get with a Sony Walkman. How you could listen to any album on it. Not something that was possible with the transistor radio. Before looking at the modern equivalents of the iconic Sony Walkman, here is some information about the fateful day, 1st July, 1979, when it went on sale:

On July 1, 1979, the first personal stereo cassette player, called the Sony Walkman, debuts for sale. It would spark a revolution in portable electronics.

The transistor radio had been the first technological marvel to put music literally into consumers’ hands in the mid-1950s. It was cheap, it was reliable and it was portable, but it could never even approximate the sound quality of a record being played on a home stereo. It was, however, the only technology available to on-the-go music lovers until Walkman appeared.

The Sony Walkman didn’t represent a breakthrough in technology so much as it did a breakthrough in imagination. Every element of the Walkman was already in production or testing as part of some other device when Sony’s legendary chairman, Masaru Ibuka, made a special request in early 1979. Ibuka was a music lover who traveled frequently, and he was already in the habit of carrying one of his company’s “portable” stereo tape recorders with him on international flights. But the Sony TC-D5 was a heavy device that was in no way portable by modern standards, so Ibuka asked his then-deputy Norio Ohga if he could cobble together something better. Working with the company’s existing Pressman product—a portable, monaural tape recorder that was popular with journalists—Ohga had a playback-only stereo device rigged up in time for Ibuka’s next trans-Pacific flight.

Even though this proto-Walkman required large, earmuff-like headphones and custom-made batteries (which, of course, ran out on Ibuka midway through his flight), it impressed the Sony chairman tremendously with its sound quality and portability. Many objections were raised internally when Ibuka began his push to create a marketable version of the device, the biggest of which was conceptual: Would anyone actually buy a cassette device that was not for recording but only for playback? Ibuka’s simple response—”Don’t you think a stereo cassette player that you can listen to while walking around is a good idea?”—proved to be one of the great understatements in business history.

After a breakneck development phase of only four months, Sony engineers had a reliable product ready for market at 30,000 Yen (approximately US $150 in 1979 dollars) and available before the start of summer vacation for Japanese students—both critical targets established at the outset of development. The initial production run of 30,000 units looked to be too ambitious after one month of lackluster sales (only 3,000 were sold in July 1979). But after an innovative consumer-marketing campaign in which Sony representatives simply approached pedestrians on the streets of Tokyo and gave them a chance to listen to the Walkman, the product took off, selling out available stocks before the end of August and signaling the beginning of one of Sony’s greatest success stories”.

I have bemoaned the fact that we do not have the Sony Walkman today. It would be great if they were reissued now. With new demand for cassettes, I think there would be call to have a modern update of the Sony Walkman. If you want to buy a portable cassette player, there are options on Amazon. Even though there are some affordable options, most of them are quite expensive. I think that, if we are going to make it easier for people to listen to cassettes portably, then we need to ensure that devices are affordable. As you can see from this website, there are stylish options from £129. I think that this is quite a lot to pay. Half of that would be much more feasible. How many people are splashing out £129 on a portable cassette player?! There are options if you shop around. It does seem that cheaper options like this are burdened with poor sound quality and a cheap feel. You can get a decent portable cassette player for £100. There are cheaper options, though you are never sure of the quality. It is great that we have options and there is a range of price options. I do feel that the great Sony Walkman could make a return. Price itself at under £60, meaning it would be a good investment and affordable to many music fans. Have a range of colour options. Making it sleek and similar, in terms of buttons/fictions to the original. Making it sturdy, shockproof and ensuring that the sound quality is excellent would make it a success story. Rather than have to search around for a dependable, cool and sturdy portable cassette player, reintroducing the Sony Walkman would solve that quandary.

The Sony Walkman does exist in modern form. It is a device that plays digital music, so it is not about cassettes anymore. Maybe a feeling that people do not want to play cassettes. I like how the Sony Walkman evolved through the years. The original is relatively bulky and has a distinct look. That refinement occurred. The initial price was quite hefty. That eventually came down. I do feel that we have flexibility now. You can get something quite good looking that does not cost a fortune. If we are to have a modern equivalent of the Sony Walkman, there is a lot to consider. Making sure that it is environmentally friendly. A price that is as low as possible. Ensuring that it is tough and does have excellent sound quality. Many might say that, forty-five years after the introduction of the Sony Walkman, do we really need it now?! Something has gone out of music. That sharing culture. The mixtapes. I do feel there is a place for them today. Not something you hear much of now. Whilst there was a fear that the Sony Walkman would lead to more antisocial behaviour, it was also a bonding experience:

Not everyone was on board with the Walkman though, public use of portable music devices was banned in Woodbridge, New Jersey in 1982 due to a rise in pedestrian accidents. Others had more ideological issues with the “isolating” and “detached” nature of the new private listening experience. However, Japanese professor Shuhei Hosokawa had a more positive outlook, describing the “Walkman effect” as giving listeners more control over their environment and more power in how they inhabit a space. Sony even preempted the potential for antisocial behaviour, giving earlier models a second headset jack, but demand for single-jack models turned out to be much higher.

Despite the moral panic around perceived antisocial behaviour, relationships were formed around the sharing of mixtapes, the forerunner to the modern-day Spotify playlist, marking a moment in consumer culture where listeners took control over what they heard and in what order. This individuality that the Walkman introduced paved the way for now ubiquitous tech like laptops and mobile phones, becoming the first piece of personal tech to be seen as cool to walk around with.

While the rise of the iPod, mobile phones and streaming services may have posed challenges for Walkman devices, Sony has sold over 400 million units across multiple platforms from cassette to CD, mini disc and MP3 since the first Walkman in 1979. The original Walkman cassette players with their clunky buttons and oversized headphones stand as one of the prevailing images of the 80s and 90s and one of the biggest music listening, tech and lifestyle shifts before or since. Monsutā will be back with another Japanese Icon in a couple of weeks. Until then, crack open a can of Monsutā, and don’t forget your headphones”.

On 1st July, 1979, the Sony Walkman went on sale. It changed everything. The start of portable music listening beyond the transistor radio. We would then get C.D. players, MP3 devices and the iPod. It can all be traced back to the Sony Walkman. On its forty-fifth anniversary, I wanted to look at its introduction, but also investigate what is available on the market now. The modern equivalents. There are choices for those who want to keep playing cassettes. I do hope that, one day, we get the Sony Walkman back. There would be demand. When you think about the Sony Walkman, there is no underestimating…

HOW important it was.

FEATURE: The Digital Mixtape: Courtney Love at Sixty

FEATURE:

 

 

The Digital Mixtape

PHOTO CREDIT: Juergen Teller

 

Courtney Love at Sixty

_________

ON 9th July…

the legendary Courtney Love turns sixty. The lead of Hole, here is someone who is a pioneer and hugely influential artist. There will be a lot written about Love ahead of her sixtieth birthday. A remarkable artist who has influenced so many others, Courtney Love was an artist I connected with as a teenager. In the 1990s, when male bands were the preference and women were as worthy but not getting the same attention, Hole made a big impact. Their second studio album, Live Through This, and the 1998 follow-up, Celebrity Skin, established Hole as one of the bands of their generation. Their latest album, Nobody’s Daughter, was released in 2010. Courtney Love also released the solo album, America’s Sweetheart, in 2004. She is someone who has made a distinct and enormous impression on music. I will come to a playlist in a minute of her solo and Hole work. Maybe I am repeating a previous feature. Though, as she is sixty soon, it is worth revisiting. Before getting to the playlist, this biography gives us some detail and key information about the peerless Courtney Love:

"Love her or loathe her, the opinionated, brutally straightforward, and seemingly always controversial Courtney Love is one of the most notable figures in alternative rock. Born on July 9, 1964 in San Francisco, CA, Love was raised in Oregon. As a teen, Love began listening to new wave and punk, musical styles that would influence her band Hole. After traveling to countries like Ireland, Japan, and England, Love moved to Los Angeles, CA. In 1986, Love appeared as Nancy Spungen's best friend in Sid and Nancy, director Alex Cox's film about Sex Pistols bassist Sid Vicious and his lover Spungen. Love was also cast in Cox's Straight to Hell. Neither picture brought Love the stardom that she craved. Love then relocated to Minneapolis, MN, and formed the all-female post-punk group Babes in Toyland with Kat Bjelland. Bjelland eventually tossed her out of the band. After working as a stripper in Alaska, Love returned to Los Angeles and started Hole in 1989 with Eric Erlandson (guitar), Jill Emery (bass), and Caroline Rue (drums). Hole released their debut album, Pretty on the Inside, in 1991.

A year later, Love married Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain. Rumors of drug use between the two began surfacing in the press, and a Vanity Press article revealed that Love was using heroin while she was pregnant with their daughter, Frances Bean Cobain. In April 1994, Kurt Cobain committed suicide; two months later, new Hole bassist Kristen M. Pfaff died from a heroin overdose. Although it was recorded before those personal tragedies, Hole's second album, the ironically titled Live Through This, captured the searing pain and violent anger of somebody undergoing a tragic loss. Rumors persisted that Cobain co-wrote a large portion of the album, a claim that Love vehemently denied despite claims to the contrary by many of Cobain's closest friends. No concrete evidence was ever released to back those claims, and she maintained a semi-professional relationship with his former bandmates by forming a partnership with them called Nirvana L.L.C. The organization would control all Nirvana-related releases and try to protect the interests of the three parties, but strife between Love and the rest of the band developed through nasty press comments made by both sides.

Meanwhile, Hole released Celebrity Skin in 1998, but the album came nowhere near the popularity of her previous effort. Despite the band's best promotional efforts (which Courtney dove headfirst into, as always), sales were discouraging enough for bandmembers to start dropping off, essentially dissolving the group while her acting career was taking off. In 1999, Love was nominated for a Golden Globe for her performance in the movie The People vs. Larry Flynt. She would stay relatively quiet for a few years, making a few film appearances and bragging up various projects with Louise Post and Kat Bjelland that never surfaced. But when former Nirvana members Krist Novoselic and Dave Grohl announced a 45-song Nirvana retrospective that would include two never released tracks, Love immediately brought them to court in an attempt to wrestle away the rights to the material. Manager/boyfriend Paul Barber tried to become the peacekeeper in the situation, even showing up at the studio for the mixdown of one of the unreleased songs. But Love moved to dissolve Nirvana L.L.C. and managed to stop the release of the album until the matter could be brought to court. The box set was aborted and the three individuals began to hype the upcoming court hearings like a boxing match, inviting the press out and making sharp barbs at one another in interviews. She announced her intentions to spearhead a Nirvana "greatest-hits" album à la the Beatles' 1, and claimed that she had hundreds of home tapes to go through and a journal that she planned on publishing.

Love also began to speak out on musicians' rights, suing her record company and bringing to light unfair business practices on the part of the industry. She began making her interviews and speeches platforms for her newfound cause, and created quite a stir at the South by Southwest Music Conference in the spring of 2002 when she directly announced her intentions of starting a music industry revolution. All that was forthcoming, however (beside more eccentric publicity), was a solo album, 2004's America's Sweetheart, released on Virgin. The following year she began working on new songs, despite battling an alleged eating disorder and a stay in rehab after violating her probation by using drugs. Working with artists including producer Linda Perry, Billy Corgan, and guitarist Micko Larkin, formerly of Larrikin Love, the album Nobody's Daughter began to take shape over 2006 and 2007. In mid-2009, Love announced that Nobody's Daughter would in fact be a Hole album. She began promoting the album in earnest in early 2010, performing shows in Europe and the U.S. -- including gigs at SXSW and on The Late Show with David Letterman -- before its release”.

To salute Courtney Love ahead of her sixtieth birthday on 9th July, I felt it only right to showcase her incredible songwriting. She is one of the most magnetic leads in music history. I am a big fan of her. A truly iconic artist. If you are new to Courtney Love and Hole or have not heard their music for a while then reacquaint and familiarise yourself. You can hear and feel just how important she is. Here’s to the…

AMAZING Courtney Love.

FEATURE: Taking Pride: Has Culture and the Music Landscape Changed So L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ Artists Can Fully Express Themselves?

FEATURE:

 

 

Taking Pride

IN THIS PHOTO: Chappell Roan/PHOTO CREDIT: Jade Greene for NYLON

 

Has Culture and the Music Landscape Changed So L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ Artists Can Fully Express Themselves?

_________

AS someone born in the 1980s…

PHOTO CREDIT: Barcelos_fotos/Pexels

who grew up with the music of the 1990s, a few things were very clear. One of those very visible and obvious aspects was that the music landscape was vastly heterosexual. There were artists who identified as gay or bisexual though, especially when it came to mainstream artists, there was far more secretive exclusion. Songs written from a heterosexual point of view. Maybe not explicit all of the time, the narrative through the decades has been that music is for heterosexual artists. That is what is seen as normal and fashionable. Artists like George Michael writing songs about being in relationships with women. How much stigma was there involved coming out? I realise that there is still some now, yet I feel there has been progress. You did have heterosexual artists toying with the notions of flirting with the opposite sex. Really, there were not that many out and proud artists. I don’t think that the culture and conversations happening at the time made it possible. This continued until relatively recent. Not only was it a case of L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists not being able to be free and true to themselves. There were fewer in the mainstream than there should have been. Perhaps seeing that the industry was not going to support and accept them. As it is Pride Month – the final day of -, it is important to look at how things have shifted. I will end with a thought that some have asked. That relates to whether we have a modern-day L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ icon. If you think of the most popular artists at the moment, we can not see too many examples. Are there still restrictions about artists’ sexuality and the type of songs played. Even if radio stations play gay anthems and tracks from L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists, most of these acts are not as celebrated as others. I do think that things need to improve in that sense.

Even if there are many negatives about music and how we digest it, the fact we have access to so many tracks with no wait means we can discover so many great artists. There are playlists like this that feature an array of queer artists. There are articles highlighting L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists to watch out for. It is wonderful that there is this exposure and celebration. Still, at the highest level of music, we do not have a Pride icon and mainstream star that can inspire and give strength to the next generation. Big artists who are near the top who do this already – Billie Eilish is one example -, though I feel even the playing of L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ songs is not as widespread as it should be. Even so, there are fewer restrictions. Artists like Reneé Rapp coming through and showing one day she will be an icon held in the same esteem of some of the biggest artists around. Things are changing. As Billboard wrote, this year’s GRAMMYs saw some historic wins for L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists:

But one such historic moment went quietly overlooked on Sunday night — three of the winners in the Big Four categories were queer women. Cyrus’s record of the year win with “Flowers,” Billie Eilish’s song of the year win for “What Was I Made For?” and Victoria Monét’s best new artist win mark the first time in recent memory that three different LGBTQ artists took home trophies in the evening’s main categories.

“It’s huge,” says Anthony Allen Ramos, vice president of communications and talent at LGBTQ advocacy organization GLAAD. “Seeing LGBTQ women dominate three of the biggest categories is something to be really excited about and proud of, especially today.”

Wins for queer artists weren’t confined to the evening’s big categories, either — LGBTQ artists earned wins across a multitude of genres. Boygenius, the supergroup made up of queer superstars Julien Baker, Phoebe Bridgers and Lucy Dacus, took home three trophies for best rock performance, best rock song and best alternative music album; Bridgers, meanwhile, walked away as the most awarded artist of the night with her four wins. Monét nabbed a win for best R&B album with Jaguar II. Americana categories awarded trophies to LGBTQ stars like Allison Russell (best American roots performance for “Eve Was Black”), Brandy Clark and Brandi Carlile (both in best Americana performance for “Dear Insecurity”).

Ramos points out that even in oft-undiscussed categories, LGBTQ artists saw huge wins. “We had Carla Patullo winning for best new age, ambient or chant album,” he tells Billboard. “It felt like we finally had wonderful representation in all genres, and I think that’s really important, because it’s not just about [queer artists] being in pop or dance. I never even thought about having LGBTQ inclusion in the best new age category!”

Representation for LGBTQ talent at the Grammys has steadily risen over the last few years, with the Recording Academy even debuting their new Academy Proud initiative this year to help “support and amplify LGBTQIA+ voices and drive queer representation at the Recording Academy and the music industry at-large.”

These major successes for queer folks at the 2024 Grammys come at a time of upheaval for the LGBTQ+ community at large — nearly 400 bills targeting the community have already been proposed this year in state legislatures around the United States, with more no doubt still to come. While LGBTQ+ artists earning record-high honors at an awards show might seem trivial in the face of direct attacks against queer and trans people around the world, the facts actually show otherwise.

According to data collected by The Trevor Project, 79% of LGBTQ+ youth reported that seeing musicians come out as members of the LGBTQ+ community made them feel better about their own identity. Meanwhile, 71% of respondents said that seeing straight, cisgender celebrities advocate for the LGBTQ+ community improved their own feelings on gender and sexuality”.

Despite there still being a bit of a barrier or hesitation about giving L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists the same platform and spotlight as others, things have come a long way. We still need to do more work to ensure that the industry is a safe and accepting space. So that artists no longer feel the need to hide who they are through fear of discrimination, abuse and a lack of airplay and contract opportunities. Everyone from The Last Dinner Party and Chappell Roan are helping to open doors. There is a revolution occurring. Real change. Now is an especially prosperous and successful time for queer women:

Perhaps there’s no better image of lesbian visibility than the cast of “The L Word” introducing pop star Reneé Rapp in front of two giant pairs of scissors last week on the Coachella stage.

Rapp, 24, has been on a steady rise after starring in “Mean Girls: The Musical” and hitting the Billboard charts with her Megan Thee Stallion collaboration, “It’s Not My Fault” (choice lyrics include “Kiss a blonde/kiss a friend/can a gay girl get an amen?”). For her Coachella debut on April 14, Rapp didn’t skimp on the Sapphism: She brought her guitarist girlfriend, Towa Bird, on stage for a duet and a kiss, and she had her self-proclaimed idol, bisexual sensation Kesha, join her for a feminist update of Kesha’s hit song “TikTok.”

In addition to Rapp, the music festival — which brings hundreds of thousands of fans to Southern California every year — featured queer artists Chappell Roan, Brazilian artist Ludmilla, Brittany Howard, Victoria Monét and Billie Eilish, the latter two fresh off Grammy wins.

Like Coachella, the Grammy Awards in February were another blockbuster music event where women — and queer women in particular — reigned supreme: Bisexual musician Phoebe Bridgers of boygenius was the night’s biggest winner;  pansexual Miley Cyrus earned both best pop solo performance and record of the year; and, of the performances, none was hailed more than singer-songwriter Tracy Chapman’s return to the stage for the first time in two decades.

Having lesbians and other openly queer women center stage at major music events, however, has certainly not been the historical norm. For more than half a century, the impact LGBTQ women have had on the modern music industry has gone largely unsung. That, however, is starting to change, with artists no longer having to be coy about their personal identities or keep them separate from their public persona to be offered opportunities in the industry.

“I think we’re only now becoming more aware of that, or being able to publicly discuss it,” said music historian and author Evelyn McDonnell. The closet, she said, has been a hindrance to the championing of and acknowledgment that queer women have been long deserving in shaping rock and popular music of all genres, from hip-hop to country”.

As we mark Pride Month, many will look at the music industry now and see how much things have changed through the years. How, until not that long ago, many L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists were not able to be their true self. As I said earlier, things are not perfect now. I do hope that we see an artist as big as Taylor Swift from the L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ community. A modern idol who will give so much strength to fans who might feel they struggle in life because of their sexual identity. There is still a lot of discrimination and ignorance around gender and sexuality today. This does not feed into music that much, though there are still issues and restrictions. An age-old attitude and preference that has not completely disappeared. Even so, the climate and tide is turning. The more L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists are spotlighted and embraced, the more it will become a normal part of music discourse. A narrative that takes us away from the heteronormative. Pride Month is a perfect opportunity to celebrate L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists new and established. Loud and proud, there are incredible queer artists slaying. Maybe not as much focus on and visibility of trans artists. With every reason to cheer, we still have to ask how long it will take before there is this stigma and judgment-free environment. Where we will have the full sexual spectrum fully represented and integrated. It can’t be too far away. Big steps have happened and progress is going on. The prejudice and fear L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ artists faced when I was young will no longer have to hide or write inauthentically. Let’s hope that this dream becomes a true reality…

IN years to come.

FEATURE: Mother’s Instinct: Looking at the Overlooked, Underdiscussed and More Problematic Kate Bush Songs

FEATURE:

 

 

Mother’s Instinct

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1980

 

Looking at the Overlooked, Underdiscussed and More Problematic Kate Bush Songs

_________

THIS sort of follows on…

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1985/PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari

from a recent post I published about Kate Bush. When discussing how she is misunderstood and there is this problem across radio, in the sense that some of her songs are seen as too out-there or inaccessible. I think that Kate Bush is one of the finest and most original songwriters ever. You cannot deny that she creates her own worlds. With every studio album, you get a wealth of songs that are so distinct and memorable. I will admit that a few of her album tracks might seem a little inappropriate for radio. 50 Words for Snow has long songs. There are one or two others that might seem a little strange. I did argue, when writing about whether Kate Bush is seen as radio-friendly and whether that is actually a thing, that her music is needlessly underexplored. Nothing in her catalogue is so strange or off-putting that it should avoid radio schedules. I am thinking about songs that might not be played because they are perhaps either not known or are problematic. Not to dwell on too many negatives. Maybe it is a case of reframing certain songs and highlighting ones that maybe have not dated well. I am not going to focus on all of them, though there are some clear examples from Kate Bush’s back catalogue that have been misunderstood or do not rank alongside her best. The first example of Room for the Life on The Kick Inside. Her 1978’s debut album’s penultimate track, many have written it off as the weakest number. I don’t think I have heard anyone really discuss this song. It featured on the setlist for 1979’s The Tour of Life, yet it is never played or investigated. In terms of interpretation, Bush was coming from the perspective that women have a much stronger survival unit then men since as they bear children, and thus should use their advantage to help men rather than play games with them. It is a dialogue between two women. Something Kate Bush rarely did. The Kick Inside has a very positive attitude towards men. In fact, many of Bush’s songs do. That need for understanding. One of the reasons I never listened to the song the whole way through, despite the fact The Kick Inside is my favourite album ever, is because the thought that, inside a woman is room for life, was hammered to death. The song seemed too simple. Compared to other tracks on the album, Room for the Life seemed pale. An article worth reading, the gender politics and naivety of the lyrics might be a reason why we do not hear Room for the Life played and explored:

In addition to its musical tastelessness, “Room for the Life” is out of touch. Bush has identified herself with male artists, admitting that a lack of interesting female songwriters was the reason (she cites Joni Mitchell, Billie Holliday, and Joan Armatrading as exceptions). When she writes about two female characters in “Room,” things fall apart (this isn’t always the case — my favorite Kate Bush song is a woman-centered dialogue, as we’ll see). The song is addressed from one woman to another, telling of the magical power of women, expressed as a singularity with the oddly agrammatical phrase “because we’re woman.” It’s an oddly naïve little song, and one with strange conclusions on how to be a woman. “Lost in your men and the games you play/trying to prove that you’re better woman,” Bush chides her friend. How dare she try to get ahead of men. The audacity of it”.

Even so, I have seen magazine polls rank Room for the Life high. In terms of Kate Bush’s best songs. Is it a case, over forty-five years since the song first came out, it should be re-examined? One could write it off as a bit of teenage naivety. I wonder whether the messages and intent of the song was ever really understood. Is it a case of Kate Bush reaching too far or maybe missing the mark?! I think every Kate Bush song is interesting and has validity. I feel Room for the Life is one that requires some discussion and reappraisal now. There are songs on 1980’s Never for Ever that are dismissed because they are seen as a bit weak. Violin and Egypt have often been spotlighted for this reason. Night Scented Stock is a short passage and segue; Blow Away (For Bill) maybe not an album highlight. Regardless, her third studio album is wonderful. An underrated work. One of the most ‘problematic’ or misunderstood songs on Bush’s 1980 gem is The Infant Kiss. So many people avoid it because of the title. Maybe radio stations do not want to play it. A case of many thinking the song is referring to a grown adult kissing a child. Kate Bush has explained the meaning behind the track:

It was based on the film, The Innocents. I saw it years ago, when I was very young, and it scared me, and when films scare you as a kid, I think they really hang there. It’s a beautiful film, quite extraordinary. This governess is supposed to look after these children, a little boy and a girl, and they are actually possessed by the spirits of the people who were in the house before. And they keep appearing to the children. It’s really scary – as scary on some levels as the idea of The Exorcist, and that terrified me. The idea of this young girl, speaking and behaving like she did was very disturbing, very distorted. But I quite like that song.

RADIO PROGRAMME, PAUL GAMBACCINI, 30 DECEMBER 1980

The thing that worries me is the way people have started interpreting that song. They love the long word–paedophilia. It’s not about that at all. It’s not the woman actually fancying the young kid. It’s the woman being attracted by a man inside the child. It just worries me that there were some people catching on to the idea of there being paedophilia, rather than just a distortion of a situation where there’s a perfectly normal, innocent boy with the spirit of a man inside, who’s extremely experienced and lusty. The woman can’t cope with the distortion. She can see that there’s some energy in the child that is not normal, but she can’t place it. Yet she has a very pure maternal love for the child, and it’s onlyy little things like when she goes to give him a kiss at night, that she realizes there is a distortion, and it’s really freaking her out. She doesn’t fancy little boys, she’s got a normal, straight sexual life, yet this thing is happening to her. I really like the distortedness of the situation.

KRIS NEEDS, ‘FIRE IN THE BUSH’. ZIGZAG (UK), 1980”.

I am not sure whether an artist today could write a song like The Infant Kiss. People jumping to conclusion. Kate Bush, always inspired by films and literature, was taking from another source rather than her own imagination. Is this why The Infant Kiss could not get played today? Again, this is a song that many fans hold in high esteem. I am working to a song that has an anniversary coming but might be among Kate Bush’s more problematic tracks. This feature is about looking at the misunderstood or maligned songs. Maybe some where the lyrics and themes might not have dated or had best intentions. The Dreaming’s title track is a classic example. Perhaps one of the biggest problems is the involvement of Rolf Harris. Maybe the Australian twang from Kate Bush some see as cultural appropriation. Is her cause and point of view a bit naïve or problematic? It is a big question. I actually love the song, though many people feel that it was not the right move. In terms of what she wrote about. Again, Kate Bush discussed the song and where she was coming from:

Well, years ago my brother bought ‘Sun Arise’ [by Rolf Harris] and I loved it, it was such a beautiful song. And ever since then I’ve wanted to create something which had that feel of Australia within it. I loved the sound of the traditional aboriginal instruments, and as I grew older, I became much more aware of the actual situation which existed in Australia between the white Australian and the aborigines, who were being wiped out by man’s greed for uranium. Digging up their sacred grounds, just to get plutonium, and eventually make weapons out of it. And I just feel that it’s so wrong: this beautiful culture being destroyed just so that we can build weapons which maybe one day will destroy everything, including us. We should be learning from the aborigines, they’re such a fascinating race. And Australia – there’s something very beautiful about that country.

‘THE DREAMING’. POPPIX (UK), SUMMER 1982

The Aboriginals are not alone in being pushed out of their land by modern man, by their diseases, or for ther own strange reasons. It is very sad to think they might all die. ‘The Dreaming’ is the time for Aboriginals when humans took the form of animals, when spirits were free to roam and in this song as the civilized begin to dominate, the ‘original ones’ dream of the dreamtime.

PRESS STATEMENT BY KATE BUSH, 1982”.

I do feel that The Dreaming has a point to make. The song seems relevant today. Maybe more relevant than back in 1982. A low chart position and not a lot of radio play meant The Dreaming wasn’t a success. It doesn’t really get played now. Kate Bush is often misunderstood as a writer. Maybe judged. I can appreciate that she wanted to write more political and socially conscious songs for her fourth studio album. Perhaps many saw it a step too far. A song that had good intentions but never really did justice to what it was trying to say. I think that a song that is perfectly fine but is never played is Mother Stands for Comfort. The only song from Hounds of Love’s first side not released as a single, it is one of the most under-discussed Kate Bush songs. Considering it is from her most successful and loved albums, it seems like an outsider. It is icier and more skeletal than other songs on that album. Its subject, about a mother covering for her murderous child, is a fascinating and original angle. You could get songs like that today from a Pop artist and they would be played more. Never performed live, this is a song that has practically languished in obscurity. This is what Kate Bush said about Mother Stands for Comfort:

Well, the personality that sings this track is very unfeeling in a way. And the cold qualities of synths and machines were appropriate here. There are many different kinds of love and the track’s really talking about the love of a mother, and in this case she’s the mother of a murderer, in that she’s basically prepared to protect her son against anything. ‘Cause in a way it’s also suggesting that the son is using the mother, as much as the mother is protecting him. It’s a bit of a strange matter, isn’t it really? [laughs] (Richard Skinner, ‘Classic Albums Interview: Hounds Of Love’. BBC Radio 1 (UK), 26 January 1992)”.

It seems like every Kate Bush album has that one song that stands out for various complex reasons. Perhaps people not understanding her words or jumping to conclusions. In terms of 1989’s The Sensual World, Heads We're Dancing is that one. Its that idea of the charm of evil people. How many can be fooled by them. Maybe it did alienate some in 1989, though this subject seems very relevant today. I have not heard many people discuss Heads We’re Dancing. I like the song a lot. I feel, even if Kate Bush discusses a song and gives her reasons for writing it, many are still put off. Maybe there are these tracks that are cast aside and not really given a fair chance. In any case, here is what Kate Bush said about one of The Sensual World’s standouts:

That’s a very dark song, not funny at all! (…) I wrote the song two years ago, and in lots of ways I wouldn’t write a song like it now. I’d really hate it if people were offended by this…But it was all started by a family friend, years ago, who’d been to dinner and sat next to this guy who was really fascinating, so charming. They sat all night chatting and joking. And next day he found out it was Oppenheimer. And this friend was horrified because he really despised what the guy stood for. I understood the reaction, but I felt a bit sorry for Oppenheimer. He tried to live with what he’d done, and actually, I think, committed suicide. But I was so intrigued by this idea of my friend being so taken by this person until they knew who they were, and then it completely changing their attitude. So I was thinking, what if you met the Devil? The Ultimate One: charming, elegant, well spoken. Then it turned into this whole idea of a girl being at a dance and this guy coming up, cocky and charming, and she dances with him. Then a couple of days later she sees in the paper that it was Hitler. Complete horror: she was that close, perhaps could’ve changed history. Hitler was very attractive to women because he was such a powerful figure, yet such an evil guy. I’d hate to feel I was glorifying the situation, but I do know that whereas in a piece of film it would be quite acceptable, in a song it’s a little bit sensitive.

LEN BROWN, ‘IN THE REALM OF THE SENSES’. NME (UK), 7 OCTOBER 1989”.

I am going to end with a few songs that, for different reasons, are either not discussed, are underrated or misunderstood. I am going to move to Aerial and 50 Words for Snow. One track from The Red Shoes that has been maligned and not played a lot is Why Should I Love You? It is not problematic or misunderstood. One reason why I highlight it is because it features Prince. Even if it is overloaded with layers and quite busy, I think it deserves more now. It is a randomly odd little cut. The fact Lenny Henry features. Not sure why! I think it is important because it features Prince. Not many opportunities where you get Kate Bush appearing on the same song as another music legend. She sang with Peter Gabriel a few times. Apart from that, there are not many examples of Kate Bush being on the same track as a genuinely huge artist. Bush did appear on a Prince album too. She sang on 1996’s Emancipation. Prince only appeared on one Kate Bush song. I am surprised Kate Bush did not reversion and strip back Why Should I Love You? for 2011’s Director’s Cut. An example of two very strong-willed and passionate producers – Kate Bush and Prince – having different visions of the song:

Bush asked Prince to contribute background vocals to ‘Why Should I Love You’ in 1991. She sent him the track, which she had recorded at Abbey Road Studios (Studio Number One), London, England, and Prince added vocals, but also added many instrumental parts to the song, at his Paisley Park Studios. When Kate Bush and Del Palmer listened to Prince’s returned track, they weren’t sure what to do with it. They worked on it on and off for two years to try to “turn it back into a Kate Bush song”. The track also features background vocals by British comedian Lenny Henry, a good friend of Kate’s”.

In terms of songs that people never really talk about and you will not hear played. Bertie is one of them. It is on the first disc of Aerial. On A Sea of Honey, this is another track never performed live. It is deeply personal. It is very open and honest. For years, people bemoaned the fact Kate Bush’s songs were oblique or not personal. That she was hiding behind characters and personas. When she did record a song with her heart out there, I saw people mock it. Is it the case that Bertie is too personal?! When reviewing Aerial in 2005, The Daily Telegraph said that this song, alongside Mrs. Bartolozzi, was one people will snigger at. An artist always mocked and insulted, have people truly heard Bertie and appreciated its importance?! Aerial is infused with home and Bush’s love for her new-born son. Even when not explicitly singing about him, he has inspired her thoughts of family and contentment. Someone who was also pivotal in her returning to the stage for 2014’s Before the Dawn. Kate Bush explained what Bertie means to her:

He’s such a big part of my life so, you know, he’s a very big part of my work. It’s such a great thing, being able to spend as much time with him as I can. And, you know, he won’t be young for very long. And already he’s starting to grow up and I wanted to make sure I didn’t miss out on that, that I spent as much time with his as I could.

So, the idea was that he would come first, and then the record would come next, which is also one reasons why it’s taken a long time (laughs). It always takes me a long time anyway, but trying to fit that in around the edges that were left over from the time that I wanted to spend with him.

It’s a wonderful thing, having such a lovely son. Really, you know with a song like that, you could never be special enough from my point of view, and I wanted to try and give it an arrangement that wasn’t terribly obvious, so I went for the sort of early music… (Ken Bruce show, BBC Radio 2, 3 November 2005)”.

The last song I want to spotlight comes from 50 Words for Snow. In terms of a song being misunderstood. Misty is a song that has been celebrated and given huge praise by critics. Those who get the track and understand it see it as hugely emotionally resonant. Even if critics have applauded it, there are others who have mocked it. Maybe compared it to The Snowman. Some have mocked it because it involves a snowman in a passionate tryst with a woman. Maybe judging it on its surface and a simple interpretation. Misty goes deeper and should be given more love and exploration. It won’t be played on radio because it is a long track. Regardless, Misty is a symbol of Kate Bush’s restless imagination, originality and undiminished genius. She talked about with BBC Radio 4’s John Wilson in 2011:

“It’s a silly idea. But I hope that what has happened is that there’s almost a sense of tenderness. I think it’s quite a dark song. And so I hope that I’ve made it work. But in a lot of ways it shouldn’t because… It’s ridiculous, isn’t it, the idea of the snowman visiting this woman and climbing into bed with her.

But I took him as a purely symbolic snowman, it was about…

No John, he’s REAL (laughs).

BBC4 RADIO, FRONT ROW, 2011”.

I want to write this feature to examine certain songs that have either been overlooked, misinterpreted or have not aged well. Some that were seen as inappropriate when they were released but seem relevant now. I am sure people can give me plenty of other examples. Not only underrated songs, these are ones that standout because they are either underplayed or have been misunderstood. It is fascinating dipping into her catalogue and thinking about songs that deserve more or perhaps, in rare occasions, were missteps. Some are examples of people misinterpretation Kate Bush’s intentions. People never really understanding her, they never…

REALLY tried.

INTERVIEW: Graeme Thomson (Author of Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush)

INTERVIEW:

  

Graeme Thomson (Author of Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush)

_________

IT has been amazing…

interviewing author and journalist Graeme Thomson about the revised and updated version of his authoritative and magnificent Kate Bush book. The superb Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush is released on 27th June through Omnibus Press. Originally published in 2010, I have learned so much about Kate Bush through his writing and passionate, detailed research. An accessible and beautifully written biography, every Kate Bush fan, whether diehard or casual, needs to order a copy:

The critically acclaimed definitive biography of Kate Bush, revised and updated for 2024, with a new foreword by Sinéad Gleeson.

Detailing everything from Bush’s upbringing to her early exposition of talent, to her subsequent evolution into a stunningly creative and endlessly fascinating visual and musical artist, Under The Ivy is the story of one woman's life in music. Written with great detail, accuracy and admiration for her work, this is in equal parts an in-depth biography and an immersive analysis of Kate Bush's art.

Focusing on her unique working methods, her studio techniques, her timeless albums and inescapable influence, Under The Ivy is an eminently readable and insightful exploration of one of the world's most unique and gifted artists. The text has been updated to include coverage of Bush’s return to the top of the charts in 2022 following the extraordinary resurgence of ‘Running Up That Hill.’ An eye-opening journey of discovery for anyone unfamiliar with the breadth of Bush’s work, Under The Ivy also rewards the long-term fan with new insights and fresh analysis”.

Given the unexpectedly busy past few years for Kate Bush and her music legacy, it is very apt that Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush has been revised. I have been speaking with Graeme Thomson about why he first decided the write the book, what we might expect from the 2024 edition, when he discovered Kate Bush, how Sinéad Gleeson was selected for the foreword, and which Kate Bush track means the most to him. It has been exciting and informative hearing from Graeme Thomson about a tremendous and endlessly fascinating book that…

EVERY Kate Bush fan should own.

__________

Hi Graeme. Before talking about Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush, I am interested knowing when Kate Bush came into your life. Do you recall the first time you heard her music and how it made you feel?

I don’t recall a particular lightbulb moment for me regarding Kate Bush. I certainly was aware of Wuthering Heights just being in the cultural DNA for as long as I can remember. I remember Running Up That Hill and Hounds of Love coming out as singles; I would have been 12 when they were released in 1985 and I remember seeing her on TOTP. I was a fan of those songs and, later, The Sensual World. Later still, I bought Hounds of Love on vinyl and The Sensual World and The Whole Story on CD, but otherwise didn’t investigate too deeply. I knew the singles, and odd songs engaged with me through the late '80s and into the '90s. Then, of course, she more or less vanished and I wasn’t really keeping up. My ears were elsewhere – in Athens, Georgia and San Francisco and Minneapolis. I probably laughed along with the Alan Partridge stuff.

I would say that it was Aerial that led me to really delve properly into her back catalogue and to explore the full reach of her work. I was drawn initially, I think, to the otherworldly, occult energy in her music. Now, I oscillate between the harder, more rhythmically driven tracks and the very stark piano-based material. There is a sense of tapping into ancient forces in her music which I still find very attractive. It has always been present. The title track of The Kick Inside has it, and so does Lake Tahoe.

Ultimately, it’s testament to the fact that Kate Bush’s work is endlessly interesting. There’s so much nourishment to be had from digging into it

I have more than one copy of the book in the form of previous issues. I am excited for this 2024 edition. Did you think, when Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush initially came out, that we would still be talking about it now? How does it feel knowing it has already reached and connected with so many people?

Well, firstly, thank you! I’m obviously very happy that the book has enjoyed such a long shelf life – literally. All you want as a writer is for your books to reach people and to continue to be available to those who might want to read them. For Under The Ivy to be widely appreciated on top of that is very gratifying, but you can’t really dictate that happening: you just have to write the book you want to write and, afterwards, hope it finds its place and its readers. When I first pitched it back in 2008, I really did feel there was a need for a serious, comprehensive and analytical biography of Kate Bush. I thought that had been lacking – and I understood why it had been lacking: because it’s not an easy thing to do. So I am pleased that my hunch paid off and that the book has been generally well regarded and has proved to have staying power, for which I must thank Omnibus Press for keeping it continually in print. I’ve also been lucky.

In the handful of years after Under The Ivy was first published in 2010, Kate Bush was so incredibly productive: two albums and a live show. That helped. Thank you, Kate! There is also the fact that – and we’ve seen this very much to be the case in recent years – her work is still being discovered anew by different demographics and different audiences in different parts of the world. I think that has helped keep the book ticking over, as well. Ultimately, it’s testament to the fact that Kate Bush’s work is endlessly interesting. There’s so much nourishment to be had from digging into it.

Can you recall why you decided to write Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush to start? How did you approach writing the book, and what was it like interviewing people from her world and diving deep?

When you first entertain the idea of writing a book, it’s a conflation of practical, personal and creative reasons, of timing, and luck, and so many other factors. I said in the last answer that I felt there was a gap in the market, to put it bluntly. That helped solidify the idea, in practical terms. Also, the idea of writing a Kate Bush biography was a challenge, and I like a challenge. I just thought there was so much still to say, so much that would be interesting, so much to get involved in.

My approach initially was, first and foremost, to let her know I was doing it – which I did. I sent a letter explaining what I was up to. Then it was a process of working on a wish list of people I wanted to interview, knowing that it was not always going to be possible for various reasons to speak to them all. You start to contact people and explain what you are doing. Sometimes it’s a straight no; sometimes it’s a maybe; sometimes it’s an enthusiastic yes; sometimes silence. As you might imagine, there are various complications when you’re writing about someone like Kate Bush. I was expecting that. I was expecting more complications, in many ways. I was surprised how many people did talk in the end.

I’m just delighted that she was able to do it, and she did a great job capturing her very personal relationship with the music of Kate Bush” 

At the same time, I started reading around the subject. I tend not to read everything at the start of a project. I’ll read enough to get a sense of the shape of a life and the important people in it, but you don’t want to be too fixed on your idea of who this person is before you start; you have to allow room for being surprised and for people telling you unexpected information or leading you down different and sometimes contradictory pathways. To not overreach for definitives is an important part of writing biography. In many ways, this part is the most enjoyable part of the process: the process of discovery, of seeing the life open up in front of you and learning new things as you’re listening to the music. I find the music becomes increasingly enriched as I learn more. Ultimately, that’s really what you are trying to pass on to the reader when you end up writing a book like this: you want to enrich their experience of listening to the music.

The wonderful Sinéad Gleeson provides a foreword to this new edition. How did you two meet and what was it about her writing and love of Kate Bush that meant she was the person to write that foreword?

Actually, I only met Sinéad in person very recently, right after she had written and submitted her foreword. We finally caught up briefly at her event in Edinburgh, where I live. We’ve been in contact sporadically for many years. She was a fan of the original edition of Under The Ivy. She wrote some nice things about it, and we’d been in touch about that. We’ve been in contact on social media and via email about various things since then. She lives in Dublin and we had some communication around my Philip Lynott biography, Cowboy Song. I knew she loved Kate Bush. I had read her journalism and I’d read This Woman’s Work, the collection of essays by woman writers that she edited a couple of years ago with Kim Gordon, which obviously takes its name from the Kate Bush song. I knew she had interviewed Kate Bush – lucky her! She had seen Before the Dawn. So I was aware that she really knew her stuff – over and above the fact that she is a fantastic writer who shares with Kate Bush an innate understanding of folklore, of elemental forces and the power of unseen worlds. So she was top of my list. One of the lovely things was that just after she delivered the foreword – during a very, very busy time for her – I was reading Hagstone, her beautiful new novel. That felt like a nice piece of serendipity. I’m just delighted that she was able to do it, and she did a great job capturing her very personal relationship with the music of Kate Bush.

PHOTO CREDIT: Guido Harari

For those who have not already bought Under The Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush, can you give any insight into new additions and what we might expect?

I wouldn’t want to overstate the extent of the revised edition. The Omnibus Remastered series, of which this is a part, is essentially about reissuing books from the publisher’s back-list with new designs and new forewords. That was the impetus behind Under The Ivy coming out again. When Omnibus said they would like Under The Ivy to be one of the first books in the series, I was delighted and flattered, and I asked whether there might be an opportunity to bring it up to date. They said yes, so I did that. But given that Kate Bush hasn’t released any new music, or appeared anywhere in public, or played any shows since I wrote the 2015 edition, I want to manage people’s expectations! The update covers the obvious things: the Stranger Things/Running Up That Hill phenomenon, which has again shifted her place in our culture, the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, the curation of her back catalogue; there are some new quotes from collaborators. To use a music analogy, it’s essentially a stylish new reissue of a well-thumbed album that has been remastered, polished up and had a couple of bonus tracks added to the tracklisting.

In this case, the ‘bonus tracks’ take the form of a gorgeous new design; a short new preface by me; a beautiful foreword by Sinéad; and then in the final section of the book, the story being brought up to the present. It feels quite satisfying, and gives any new readers or recently engaged Kate Bush fans a pretty complete picture of her career thus far. It is also the first time Under The Ivy has been available in A Format (or mass-market paperback) size, which I’m really delighted about.

PHOTO CREDIT: Brian Aris

There are great quotes in the book from wonderful people like Paddy McAloon and Jude Rogers. How much of a thrill is it knowing that your words have connected with fellow writers and legendary musicians?

It’s hugely flattering. I think it is a testament to Kate Bush as much as anything, people respond to her work in a way that is very generous, and that has perhaps been reflected in how they have responded to my book. With Paddy McAloon, I interviewed him some years ago in a hotel in Durham and he produced two copies of Under The Ivy for me to sign – one to his wife, and one to Wendy Smith – and was very complimentary about it. He’s a lovely man and one of our greatest songwriters, so that meant a lot. So I thought I’d tap him up for a quote! Jude and I both wrote for the much missed Word magazine back in the day. She writes with so much soul; there’s never a false note. Her book, The Sound of Being Human, is original and tremendous, and she’s another writer who really knows her Bushcraft. To receive such lovely words from her, and from Kathryn Williams, Emma Pollock, Rob Young, Laura Barnett and Jim Kerr, all of whom were kind enough to also provide endorsements, is incredibly gratifying.

One of the joys of writing Under The Ivy has been hearing from fellow writers, musicians, artists, whole swathes of people, who have enjoyed it. I was speaking with Chris Bryant, the Labour MP, quite recently, and he told me that his husband loved Kate Bush and that Under The Ivy was a favourite book of his. Little things like that can be very consequential for a writer, whoever it comes from. I get a kick out of any and every person telling me they have enjoyed something I have written.

East Wickham Farm was a very seductive place to visit in my head – or at least my idea of it was” 

I think you have possibly written more words about Kate Bush than anyone alive now (a guess…but I am pretty sure). Did you learn a lot of new things about Kate Bush when writing the book, and do you have a favourite fact/section of the book that was a particular joy to write?

I’m not sure the first part of that statement is true! It can’t be. I learned innumerable things about Kate Bush while writing the book, because I didn’t start with a deep, fan-level knowledge of her at all. I had pretty limited knowledge at the beginning of the process. The book was really an active journey of discovery. Oftentimes my favourite parts of my books cover the early years, pre-fame: with Under The Ivy, it was about establishing the family dynamic, the family background, the musical, artistic, creative and literary touchstones of her work, and a physical sense of place. That’s always really illuminating, but particularly so for Kate Bush, because I think those elements are very, very instructive in terms of understanding not just elements of her work, but also how she operates, how she lives her life and her values system. I wanted to call these things back regularly throughout the book. I thought if I could establish who she is, and where she comes from, at a fairly early stage, then that would pay off all the way through the book. And I loved living in that world! East Wickham Farm was a very seductive place to visit in my head – or at least my idea of it was. It felt like a very safe and magical and creatively stimulating microworld. I really loved being there and going back there when I was writing.

PHOTO CREDIT: John Carder Bush

Do you have a personal favourite Kate Bush album? Mine is The Kick Inside. Is there one that has a very special meaning to you?

The obvious answer would be Hounds of Love. Sometimes it is just a fact that the most popular album, the bestselling album, the album with the big singles on it, might just be the best album, too. I think it is a monumental and pretty much perfect piece of work encompassing so many aspects of her artistry. I love Aerial. As I said earlier, it kickstarted my deeper interest in Kate Bush and I find that album more and more personally resonant as time goes on. I wrote a piece quite recently for Disco Pogo magazine, and I concluded with the idea that Aerial is a song for a life, not just a song of a day. As we get older we accrue experience and loss, our children grow up, we ache more deeply, and yet we still strive to access joy and find ways to escape our quotidian lives. Aerial seems to me to speak to those struggles and rewards so beautifully. The other album I would mention is The Dreaming. I was putting a playlist together recently and I listened to Suspended in Gaffa for the first time in quite a long time – and I really listened to it; sometimes you just let songs drift by – and I thought, Goodness, what a wonderful song that is. The Dreaming has some amazing work on it. It is such a brave and bold and sometimes silly record, and very significant in her development. I love many things about all her albums, but those three are probably my favourites.

It is a question many Kate Bush fans would ask themselves but, if you were to interview her today, what would be your opening question?

(When) Are you going to release a new album, Kate?

If you found yourself in a Desert Island Discs-style scenario and you could only rescue one of Kate Bush’s tracks - the one that is most special to you -, then which would you save?

Hello Earth. There is something about that song that moves me profoundly. The way it evolves from this very personal, intimate, close-up perspective into a vast macro overview of our world and our tiny place in it and on it. It almost feels as though it contains the whole of Hounds of Love in microcosm: it has got very experimental elements; a choral section which is like the moon being obscured by clouds, so darkly, beautifully atmospheric. But it also has lovely, flowing melody, incredible harmonies, wonderful words. It is the ultimate Kate Bush piece for me. Huge in scale and ambition, and I find it very moving.

Finally, we can end with any Kate Bush song that you like. Which one shall we go with? Thank you, Graeme!

Under the Ivy. What else?! It’s such a beautiful little song and it’s great that it seems to have grown into a real fans’ favourite; a treasured deep cut. People complain that it is not on Spotify or other streaming services, but I kind of love that. You need to dig it out a little bit. It is such a special song, so sad and mysterious, with a touch of the occult in there. I’m very pleased I chose it as my title track…

FEATURE: The Dial, Retuned: Inside the Gender & Racial Disparity Data Report on UK Radio 2023-2024

FEATURE:

 

 

The Dial, Retuned

ILLUSTRATION CREDIT: depositphotos

 

Inside the Gender & Racial Disparity Data Report on UK Radio 2023-2024

_________

LAST year…

when reports came out about the gender and racial breakdown across U.K. radio, there was some troubling statistics and realisation. Women were vastly underrepresented when it came to airplay across U.K. stations. It was even more grim for artists of colour. There needed to be changes. U.K. stations could not just sit by and have this sexism and racism continue. A complete ignorance of incredible artists. This year, the findings are far more positive. As I will explore, though it is brilliant that BBC Radio has really retuned the dial and stroke gender equality across a few of its stations, there is little move from some. Bauer Media radio stations are especially lacking, though some have improved from last year. A huge thanks to Why Not Her? for their hard work and passion. They have provided the breakdown – gender and ethnicity – of the artists who appear on the Top 100 and Top 20 song playlists. A thanks too to Linda Coogan Byrne of Why Not Her? She is an equality campaigner who has poured so much of herself into it. I am going to bring in the press release that showcases some of the key findings. There are also comments from Linda Coogan Byrne and Winnie Ama. You can see the Gender & Racial Disparity Data Report on UK Radio 2023-2024 here. It is a year for cheer and optimism:

Why Not Her? Annual Radio Data Report on UK Radio 2023/2024:

In a landmark year for gender equality in music, women have taken the lead in the Top 100 songs on UK Radio, making 2024 a historic year for female artists on the airwaves. This significant achievement is not only a triumph for the artists themselves but a testament to the cultural shift driven by the UK radio industry towards greater gender parity.

For the first time, female artists have outpaced their male counterparts, with women representing 41% of the Top 100 songs, compared to 39% for male artists and 20% for gender collaborations. This progress is a clear indicator that intentional efforts to promote gender equality in the music industry are yielding remarkable results.

The progress we celebrate today is a testament to the power of collective action and the unwavering commitment to gender equality. As we continue to support and uplift female artists, we move closer to a future where the music industry reflects the rich diversity and talent that exists within it.

Let us continue to champion inclusivity and celebrate the voices of all artists, ensuring that the airwaves remain a platform for diverse and equitable representation.

Gender Breakdown in Top 100 Airplay Chart (Jan-Jun 2024)

·        Female artists: 41%

·        Male artists: 39%

·        Collaborations: 20% 

Ethnicity Breakdown in Top 100 Airplay Chart (Jan-Jun 2024)

·        White artists: 71%

·        People of Colour (POC): 17%

·        Ethnicity collaborations: 12% 

Top UK Radio Stations' Gender Disparity (June 2023 - June 2024)

·        BBC Radio 2: Achieved 50% gender parity.

·        BBC Radio 6 Music: 50% female artists.

·        BBC Radio 1: Increased support for female artists, achieving higher female representation in their Top 20. 

Top Played Songs and Artists

- Most played song overall: "Lose Control" by Teddy Swims

- Most played UK artist song: "Lovers in a Past Life" by Calvin Harris x Rag 'n' Bone Man

- Most played artist: Dua Lipa, with 5% of songs in the Top 100

Top Repeated/Impacting Artists in the Top 100 Songs across UK radio (so far) in 2024

- Dua Lipa is the most repeated artist with five songs.

- Taylor Swift and Lewis Capaldi follow closely with four songs each.

- Ed Sheeran and Miley Cyrus each have three songs.

- Becky Hill also has three songs. 

These artists dominate the UK radio airwaves with multiple hits, reflecting their popularity and influence in the current music scene. 

Label Impact Analysis

Record Label Dominance: 

- WMG (Warner Music Group): 40%

- Atlantic, Warner Records, Parlophone, Curb Records, Champion Records 

- UMG (Universal Music Group): 32%

- Island, Virgin Records, EMI, Polydor, Universal Music, Republic Records, Mercury, Motown EMI, Def Jam, Positiva 

- SME (Sony Music Entertainment): 20%

- RCA, Columbia, Black Butter, Ministry Of Sound, Sony Music, Insanity Records, AWAL, Relentless 

- Independent: 8%

- gamma., Human Re Sources, Bmg Rights Management, XL Recordings, Champion Records

Songwriter/Producer Analysis

Songwriter definition, defined by PRS: Composer (includes composing producers); Author (including lyricists); Composer/Author; Arranger; Translator

Data source: PRS 

The Top 100 songs had 463 songwriters.
Average of 4.6 songwriters per song 

Gender Split

23% Female songwriters

76.8% Male songwriters

0.2% Non-Binary songwriters

Ethnicity Split

78% White songwriters

20% POC/Mixed songwriters

2% Latin songwriters

Insights

·        98% of songs by female artists had at least 1 female writer.

·        33% of songs by male artists had at least 1 female writer

·        95% of of songs by female artists had at least 1 male writer

·        100% of songs by male artists had at least 1 male writer

·        77% of songs by male artists were written only by men, with 0 female writers

·        Male artists are more likely to write alone/with their own gender 77% vs female artists who only wrote alone/with their own gender 5% of the time

·        19% of songs by gender collaborating artists had 0 female writers

·        100% of songs by POC artists had POC writers

·        47% of songs by POC artists had 0 female writers

·        33% of songs by White artists had 0 female writers

·        The song with the most songwriters is ‘Lighter’ by Galantis x David Guetta x 5 Seconds Of Summer. It has 13 songwriters.·       

Celebrating a Historic Year for Women in UK Radio

London, UK - June 2024

In a landmark year for gender equality in music, women have taken the lead in the Top 100 songs on UK Radio, making 2024 a historic year for female artists on the airwaves. This significant achievement is not only a triumph for the artists themselves but a testament to the cultural shift driven by the UK radio industry towards greater gender parity.

For the first time, female artists have outpaced their male counterparts, with women representing 41% of the Top 100 songs, compared to 39% for male artists and 20% for gender collaborations. This progress is a clear indicator that intentional efforts to promote gender equality in the music industry are yielding remarkable results.

Commendations are due to the UK radio stations, especially the trailblazers in gender equality who played more than 25% women in their top 20 radio annual playlists. Leading the charge are BBC Radio 1, BBC Radio 2, BBC Radio 6 Music, Capital FM, KISS, Heat Radio, Channel 103 FM, and Island FM. Their dedication to inclusivity has paved the way for this momentous cultural change.

Equally noteworthy are the stations that have room for growth, including Absolute Radio, Smooth Radio, Magic Radio, Heart FM, 3FM, KISS Fresh, Lincs FM, Northsound 1, and Tay FM. We look forward to seeing these stations make strides towards greater gender balance in the coming years.

This year's BRIT Awards further highlight the strides made, with Raye making history by winning six awards, including Album of the Year and Artist of the Year. Raye's journey from overcoming industry obstacles to reclaiming her power and inspiring countless others showcases the transformative power of perseverance and talent.

The most played artists of 2024 further emphasise this shift. Dua Lipa stands as the most played UK artist, while Taylor Swift leads as the most played international artist. The most played song overall is "Lose Control" by Teddy Swims, with "Lovers In A Past Life" by Calvin Harris x Rag'n'Bone Man being the most played UK song.

The progress we celebrate today is a testament to the power of collective action and the unwavering commitment to gender equality. As we continue to support and uplift female artists, we move closer to a future where the music industry reflects the rich diversity and talent that exists within it.

Let us continue to champion inclusivity and celebrate the voices of all artists, ensuring that the airwaves remain a platform for diverse and equitable representation.

Comment from Linda Coogan Byrne on the Outstanding Culture Change on UK Radio 

“In a historic year for gender equality in music, the UK radio industry has achieved remarkable progress by leading the charge towards greater representation of female artists. Women now represent 41% of the top 100 songs on UK Radio, outpacing their male counterparts and highlighting a significant cultural shift towards inclusivity and diversity. This achievement underscores the power of collective action and the unwavering commitment of UK radio stations to promote gender parity.

The efforts of trailblazing stations like BBC Radio 1, BBC Radio 2, BBC Radio 6 Music, Capital FM, KISS, Heat Radio, Channel 103 FM, and Island FM have paved the way for this momentous change. Their dedication to playing more than 25% women in their top 20 annual playlists demonstrates a commendable commitment to inclusivity.

However, it is with a heavy heart that we must contrast this progress with the situation in Ireland. Despite our campaigns and calls for action, meeting with political parties and the new media commision numerous times over the last 5 years - we continue to be met with empty promises, Irish radio stations and the media regulators have largely failed to shift towards gender parity. We asked, "Why not her?" and the UK radio stations responded with action and results. In Ireland, our pleas were met with silence and inaction.

It is essential that we continue to push for change and hold media outlets accountable for their role in shaping a fair and equitable industry. The success in the UK shows that with determination and commitment, meaningful change is possible. It is time for Irish radio and its broadcasting authorities in the Coimisiún na Meán, to take note and follow suit, ensuring that female artists receive the recognition and airtime they deserve.

Let us celebrate the progress made and continue to advocate for a future where gender equality is the norm across all airwaves”

Winnie Ama also comments: 

“It is amazing to see that the Top 100 UK chart includes lots of females, ethnic minorities, and local UK artists this year. For the first time in 35 years of chart data, music in the charts finally reflects the modern society that we live in. 

This year, the UK music industry should be held up as an example of how it is possible for organisations (radio stations) and individuals (radio presenters) to create inclusion consciously at each level, with real impact on culture as a whole. 

A lot of people discover new music through the radio, the impact of having a diverse range of artists on radio will inevitably have a ripple effect throughout culture and artist careers.

Long may this continue”.

There is a lot to be happy about! I did not think that BBC Radio 2 especially would affect gender equality in the Top 20 songs department. I listen to shows now and they are full of male artists. It goes to show that, across the board, they have made efforts to redress a serious problem. In terms of gender breakdown of all artists in the Top 100 UK Radio Airplay Chart, women were ahead. The ethnicity breakdown is a little less optimism. Still a way to go in terms of representation. BBC Radio 1 and BBC Radio 6 Music have struck a great balance. So too have BBC Radio 1. Even if 1Xtra is heading in the wrong direction, three huge BBC stations have committed themselves to gender equality. Bauer and Global radio stations have to learn from the BBC. There are some improvements that give encouragement, though Kerrang! Radio, Absolute Radio, Smooth Radio and Radio X need to learn lessons and improve for 2025. Capital FM has made strides.

In all, it means BBC stations have taken to heart findings from last year’s report. I do think that this should be the biggest takeaway in terms of gender. Bauer and Global still need to do a lot of work. Even so, there are some improvements here. Potential for bigger steps next year. The Gender & Racial Disparity Data Report on UK Radio shows how the radio stations have changed over the past five years. You can see how they have improved/fallen behind. There is a lot of brightness. Apart from some worrying findings – 100% of artists on the Top 20 playlist at Absolute Radio are white! -, there is cause for celebration. It is clear that Absolute Radio, Radio X, Kerrang! Radio and Kiss Fresh need to make steps. BBC stations very much leading the way. Let us not forget that this report is about the gender and ethnicity of artists in the Top 20 playlists, rather than right across the board. If you look at schedules for most stations (apart from BBC Radio 6 Music), things might look more skewed towards male artists. Despite this, what has been put together by Why Not Her? proves that, for many stations, it is important that female artists are very much included in the Top 20 playlists. This is very good indeed! Three very clear sections. The first section of the report is an analysis of the Top 100 Radio Airplay songs in 2024 from both UK and International artists, from Jan 2024 to June 2024 in all radio stations combined across the UK, looking at the gender and ethnicity across the Top 100 Airplay songs. The second section takes a look at the songwriters behind the Top 100 songs on UK Radio in 2024. The third section is an analysis of 27 individual radio stations, looking at the gender disparity present in the Top 20 most played songs by British artists, in Britain, over the period of JUNE 1st 2023 to JUNE 1st 2024. The collective data clearly and brilliantly shows how things have changed and (mostly) improved from last year. Let’s hope that this trend continues. A huge thanks and salute once more to Why Not Her? for their amazing research and dedication putting together the Gender & Racial Disparity Data Report on UK Radio. It is incredible that things have improved for female artists and artists of colour. Especially for women. Some important steps. Let’s hope that this evolution occurs…

YEAR after year.

FEATURE: Waking the Witch: Has the Media and Public Perception of Kate Bush Truly and Fully Changed?

FEATURE:

 

 

Waking the Witch

IN THIS PHOTO: Kate Bush in 1993/PHOTO CREDIT: John Stoddart

 

Has the Media and Public Perception of Kate Bush Truly and Fully Changed?

_________

MAYBE the answer seems obvious…

though I don’t think it is unreasonable of me to say that, about a month until Kate Bush’s sixty-sixth birthday, there does seem to be this perception of her that has not entirely shifted since 1978. I can draw in what songs are played on radio and the relative lack of Kate Bush features. I still think that, for the most part, when we see articles written about Kate Bush, many of them are from news sites. Reactions to various bits of news. The same words keep coming up when discussing Bush. They either limit her to one song – usually Wuthering Heights or Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) -, or they use words like ‘recluse’, ‘private’ or even ‘weird’. That sense that, decades after her debut album, Kate Bush is still this witch-like figure. Maybe someone who shuts herself away and does not engage in public. This perception that an artist like Kate Bush needs to go to events and is out and about. There has been some change and more positivity towards her yet, again and again, you get the same sort of perception about her. I think that there really is a lack of Kate Bush features. Various sites do run some, yet there most features are tied to news or anniversaries. I do like how there is more attention her way now. How the U.S. has embraced her in a way they have never done. I still find it a little dismaying more is not written about Kate Bush. Why do we need to wait until some news breaks?! I write about Kate Bush all of the time. I can appreciate how magazines do features and articles. Look at news relating to Kate Bush and articles written about her. You will find there are weird and annoying clickbait and tabloid things – one recent one where Simon Cowell was amazed at how much Kate Bush was worth when he found a cheque for her; other ones talking about Kate Bush’s wealth -, plus people reaction to news items. Very little that goes deeper and looks at her music and various aspects of her personality. I am actually going to quote from a feature that was published quite recently. There is a website, Far Out Magazine, that publishes a Kate Bush feature every week or so. Most of it consists of short features that are not really original features but they are more to do with Kate Bush’s influence, the album that meant the most to her, her connection to David Bowie. Basic stuff that does not really go beyond a single fact or thought. I think that, the more we write about Kate Bush and the more we explore, the better understanding we have. That perception will change.

Having recently interviewed Graeme Thomson about the reissue of his book, Under the Ivy: The Life and Music of Kate Bush, I would urge people to read this. Journalists. Get a real feel for the real Kate Bush. Even though she is in her sixties, the same sort of words and attitudes are applied to her. A preconception that is based on nothing but misinformation and cliches. She is a complex and remarkable artist that deserves more words written about her. Features that go beyond talking about her wealth, things to do with Stranger Things. News items are great, as we are aware of what is happening in relation to Kate Bush and her world. Kate Bush has always faced this. In the 1970s onwards, the media often focused on sexuality. An over-sexualisation of her. Louder wrote about Kate Bush’s early years for a feature. They make some interesting points:

The tour triumphed, though reviews ranged from “her unabashed obsession with sex” to “you’re distracted by Katy being wheeled around in a giant satin-lined chocolate box.” Others praised “a dazzling testimony to a remarkable talent” and “the best welding of rock and theatrical presentation that we’re ever likely to see.”

We need more people like her, especially as so much music amounts to little more than formulaic copying of genres

She baulked again at the over-emphasis on her sexuality, and began to loathe anything that fell under the banner of promotion. With her family, she took control of her business affairs, producing her next EP (Live On Stage) alone, and then the 1980 album Never For Ever. This, yielding the hit singles Babooshka and Army Dreamers, was to be her first Number One album, and the first by any British female artist.

A durable paradox emerged: the more she distanced herself from public life, the more the public were intrigued by this individual, idiosyncratic, influential talent. As David Gilmour has proclaimed: “We need more people like her, especially as so much music amounts to little more than formulaic copying of genres. Those who have followed in her shadow are but pale imitations”.

There are a combination of factors that mean we have not really transitioned from an old perception of Kate Bush. I will talk about it in another feature but, speaking to so many people in their twenties and thirties, it is shocking how few know about her. Maybe know her for one song. The words they use to describe her often relate to her being odd, reclusive or weird – none of which is true! It is frustrating that there is still a lot of people who do not really know about Kate Bush. Maybe one can say because she has not released an album in over a decade, that is fair enough. There are plenty of artists who have not released an album for longer – or have died – that are better known and understood. I think the media does not help when it comes to a certain ignorance and perception. Bush, in the 1970s and 1980s, had to face a lot of misconception, sexism and judgement. It did not really stop. Even up through the 2000s and 2010s, whenever she released an album, there would be articles discussing how eccentric she was. How this supposed reclusive artist was back. Discussing how she was mysterious or odd. Things have improved a bit. I still feel that there is such a narrow focus and idea of who Kate Bush is. When her songs are played on radio, a relatively small number are selected. Media coverage is quite sparse. You get some interesting deep dives, yet most articles are not really going beyond the surface. Even if she has not released an album since 2011, that does not mean we should stop digging and exploring. Artists like her are inspiring so many others. Because of that, we need to write more about Kate Bush. Even if more generations know her work and she is not being portrayed the same way as she was at the start of her career, there is still so little beyond the stereotypical and incorrect. Radio stations need to embrace her. Words need to be written. More love and understanding. Uncovering her full body of work. Get rid of those words and phrases always associated with Kate Bush. This hugely important and legendary artist is worthy of…

THAT at the very least!